© 2002 by the American Diabetes Association, Inc.
Treatment Issues in Type 2 DiabetesZachary T. Bloomgarden, MD, is a practicing endocrinologist in New York, New York, and is affiliated with the Diabetes Center, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York
Abbreviations: ADA, American Diabetes Association AICAR, 5-aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide 1-ß-D-ribofuranoside CT, computed tomography FFA, free fatty acid Lp(a), lipoprotein(a) NHANES, National Health and Nutrition Evaluation Study PDH, pyruvate dehydrogenase PGZ, pioglitazone PPAR, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor RGZ, rosiglitazone SC, subcutaneous TGZ, troglitazone TNF- This is the fourth in a series of reports on the American Diabetes Association (ADA) 61st Scientific Sessions held in Philadelphia, PA, in June 2001. It covers topics related to the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Insulin resistance Perriello et al. (263-OR) performed hyperinsulinemic clamps in five normal individuals from 5:00 to 8:00 A.M. and from 5:00 to 8:00 P.M., on both occasions after a 9-h fast (abstract numbers refer to the Abstracts of the 61st Annual Meeting of the American Diabetes Association, Diabetes 50 [Suppl. 2]:1-A649). Insulin action decreased 27% in the evening, partially explaining the decrease in glucose tolerance in the afternoon versus early morning hours. Zaccaro et al. (301-PP) compared insulin sensitivity calculated from the frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test with surrogate measures based on fasting insulin and glucose levles in 1,118 persons in the family members in the Insulin Resistance Atherosclerosis Study (IRAS), showing a greater degree of genetic contribution to specifically measured insulin sensitivity than to the measurement of fasting insulin alone, the product of fasting insulin and fasting glucose divided by 22.5 (the "homeostasis model" [HOMA] measure), or the reciprocal of the product of fasting insulin and glucose (the "Bennet index"). These surrogate measures of insulin sensitivity may therefore be less useful than previously thought. Mather et al. (9-LB) reported that the T786C variant of the endothelial isoform of nitric oxide synthase was associated with insulin resistance, perhaps contributing to its association with endothelial dysfunction. Meyer et al. (198-OR) compared hepatic and renal glucose production, which were 10.3 and 3.6 µmol · kg-1 · min-1, respectively, in 10 type 2 diabetic patients and 8.4 and 2.16 µmol · kg-1 · min-1 in 12 nondiabetic control subjects, using tritiated glucose turnover and renal vein glucose measurement. During hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamps, hepatic and renal glucose production decreased 30 and 33% in the diabetic patients and 52 and 62%, respectively, in the control subjects, suggesting substantial renal contribution to glycemia in type 2 diabetes. Woerle et al. (413-P) used similar techniques following overnight insulin infusion in 30 patients with type 2 diabetes compared with 26 control subjects, showing somewhat greater suppression of hepatic than renal glucose release in the patients.
In a clinical study, Cagliero et al. (362-P) reported that insulin sensitivities were reduced by 78 and 62%, respectively, in 10 and 12 patients treated with the atypical antipsychotic agents clozapine and olanzapine, in comparison with insulin sensitivity in patients treated with risperidone, suggesting that the former agents may induce insulin resistance. Spoelstra et al. (875-P) used a pharmacy dispensing record system with AMP-activated protein kinase
At a seminar on new therapeutic targets for type 2 diabetes, Lee Witters, Dartmouth, NH, described AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) as "a metabolic sensor-effector," with metabolic stress increasing the AMP/ATP ratio, activating AMPK, and thereby leading to increased nitric oxide synthase, greater GLUT4-mediated glucose transport, and many other effects. AMPK has subunits
The AMPK activator 5-aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide 1-ß-D-ribofuranoside (AICAR) is thought to increase muscle glucose uptake by mimicking the effect of exercise-related muscle contraction, an action independent of and complementary to the effect of insulin. Young et al. (243-OR) described a number of effects of a 7-day course of AICAR on rat skeletal muscle gene expression, including neuronal nitric oxide synthase and citrate synthase without increase in GLUT4 mRNA, mimicking exercise training-induced alterations. Coven et al. (245-OR) found that AMPK is activated to a similar extent in heart as in skeletal muscle during exercise, suggesting an important role in regulating myocardial metabolism. Aschenbach et al. (244-OR) reported that AICAR decreased blood glucose 50 mg/dl in normal rats over a 120-min period, increased the
AMPK may play a role in the treatment of diabetes. Kraegen et al. (324-PP) showed that a single injection of AICAR increased muscle glucose uptake and glycogen formation during a hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp over the subsequent 2 h and also increased insulin suppressibility of hepatic glucose production, suggesting a potential approach for pharmacologic therapy. Islam et al. (1318-P) treated insulin-deficient streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats with AICAR, which decreased glucose from 501 to 170 mg/dl at 4 h, with a 2.6-fold lower area under an oral glucose tolerance curve after 4 days. It appears that changes in AMPK activity occur with administration of metformin. Musi et al. (1127-P) found 2.7- and 1.5-fold increases, respectively, in Insulin sensitizers Fleming et al. (448-P) reported a study of 165 sulfonylurea-treated patients given D-chiro-inositol, a precursor of the mediator released by hydrolysis of a membrane-bound inositolphosphoglycan when insulin binds to its receptor. In comparison with placebo, over 3 months HbA1c fell 0.16% versus increasing 0.2%. The difference was most pronounced among patients with fasting glucose <180 mg/dl whose HbA1c fell 0.52% while increasing 0.27% with placebo. Improvement of glucose with either sulfonylureas or metformin may directly improve macrovascular risk factors. Cefalu et al. (601-P) treated 81 type 2 diabetic patients for 6 weeks, showing that plasminogen activator inhibitor type-1 decreased from 202 to 166 ng/ml with glipizide GITS and from 201 to 174 ng/ml with metformin. Mugellini et al. (582-P) studied 164 nonsmoking patients with type 2 diabetes who were not receiving hypolipidemic drugs, diuretics, ß-blockers, or thyroxine; had normal renal function; and were treated with glimepiride versus metformin. With similar blood glucose lowering, there was no difference in the effects of the two drugs on lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)]. HbA1c decreased from 8.5 to 6.9% vs. 8.4 to 7.0%, and Lp(a) decreased from 45 to 39 mg/dl and from 48 to 43 mg/dl, respectively.
Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-
Yamauchi et al. (1578-P) pointed out that high-fat diet-induced insulin resistance is blocked by activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)- TZDs Buchanan et al. (327-PP) presented follow-up data from the Troglitazone in Prevention of Diabetes (TRIPOD) study of 235 women who had had gestational diabetes randomized to placebo or TGZ. Annual incidence rates of type 2 diabetes during the 30-month study were 12.3 and 5.4%, respectively. Analysis of treated patients showed that the 35 subjects whose insulin sensitivity did not improve had an annual diabetes incidence of 9.8%, and that the 42 subjects whose insulin response to intravenous glucose declined only slightly had a 5.8% annual incidence, while none of the 31 subjects who showed a large improvement in insulin sensitivity developed diabetes during the follow-up period. During the first 8 months after stopping treatment, 6 of 40 who had received placebo developed diabetes, while only 1 of 41 treated with TGZ had such an effect, suggesting that not only was there not a "catch-up" of patients off treatment, but that there actually appeared to be benefit lasting well beyond the treatment period.
Banerji et al. (356-P) measured total body fat and lean body mass by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and total abdominal visceral and subcutaneous (SC) adipose tissue mass by multislice abdominal computed tomography (CT) scans in 16 patients with type 2 diabetes who were treated with RGZ. Their results showed an increase in SC but not in visceral abdominal fat. Kamada et al. (280-OR), however, used CT scanning to show correlation of fat content of hip and thigh muscle, but not of abdominal visceral or SC fat, with the glycemic response to pioglitazone (PGZ) 30 mg daily in 20 patients with type 2 diabetes. King and Armstrong (481-P) reported progressive and linear 0.45 kg/month weight gain over 8 months in 100 patients without clinical edema treated with PGZ 45 mg daily, while HbA1c decreased by 0.36% per month for the first 3 months and by 0.14% per month for the next 2 months, with no fall in HbA1c during the subsequent 3 months. These results suggest that the weight gain occurs independently of the glycemic effect. Those in the top quartile of weight gain had shorter duration of diabetes, greater baseline BMI, and trends to greater decreases in HbA1c and triglycerides. Satoh et al. (521-P) compared 38 patients who showed a fall in HbA1c of at least 1% with PGZ 30 mg daily for 3 months to 18 patients with a lesser decrease in HbA1c; 90% of patients with leptin >7 ng/ml were responders, while there were no differences in BMI or tumor necrosis factor- Lipid effects of TZDs
At a symposium at the ADA meeting sponsored by the Academy for Healthcare Education, Peter Tontonoz, Los Angeles, CA, discussed the PPAR family of nuclear receptors, which differ from most nuclear receptors in having broad ligand specificities, showing activation by physiologic concentrations of a range of native and modified polyunsaturated fatty acids (1). PPAR-
Steven A Kliewer, Research Triangle Park, NC, discussed the results of differential gene expression studies assessing the actions of PPAR-
Harold Lebovitz, Brooklyn, NY, further discussed PPAR-
An important question concerns whether PPAR-
Barbara C. Hansen, Baltimore, MD, discussed the effect of the PPAR- Four studies of patients previously treated with TGZ were displayed at the ADA Annual Meeting. Davidson et al. (437-P) randomized 39 patients to PGZ 45 mg versus RGZ 8 mg; Gegick and Altheimer (452-P) randomized 125 patients to PGZ (81% receiving 45 mg) versus RGZ (77% receiving 8 mg); Khan et al. (477-P) randomized 97 patients to PGZ versus RGZ in doses proportionate to their initial TGZ dose; and King and Armstrong (482-P) randomized 61 patients to PGZ 45 mg versus RGZ 8 mg. HbA1c fell from 7.5 to 7.1% with PGZ, whereas it did not change with RGZ in the Davidson et al. study, although it was similar in the three larger studies. Davidson et al. found that HDL cholesterol increased from 47 to 54 mg/dl and from 40 to 47 mg/dl, respectively, with the two agents. Gegick and Altheimer found that the triglyceride-to-HDL ratio decreased from 5.7 to 4.7 mg/dl with PGZ and increased from 4.7 to 7.0 mg/dl with RGZ. Khan et al. reported increases in HDL from 42 to 45 mg/dl with both agents, and a fall in LDL from 120 to 101 mg/dl and in triglyceride from 191 to 176 mg/dl with PGZ, as compared with no change with RGZ. King and Armstrong noted that HDL increased 12% with PGZ and decreased 5% with RGZ, but administration of the latter was initiated with a higher HDL level. Although meta-analysis of the combined group of 322 patients would be of interest, there appears overall to have been no difference in HbA1c, an increase in HDL cholesterol with both, and no consistent difference in LDL cholesterol. Two of the studies suggest greater triglyceride-lowering with PGZ. Brunzell et al. (567-P) reported an 8% increase in LDL cholesterol over 8 weeks and stabilization for the next 16 weeks with RGZ 4 mg twice daily, but with a decrease in LDL density and an improvement in HDL cholesterol via selective increases in HDL2.
Nonmetabolic effects of PPAR-
Zheng et al. (297-PP) cultured mouse mesangial cells with or without TGZ. PPAR- Diabetes in the elderly
Reuben Andres, Baltimore, MD, discussed the question of whether diagnostic standards for diabetes should be age-specific, pointing out that the ADA received "considerable flack" for its 1997 recommendation that fasting glucose is sufficient for diabetes and that the glucose tolerance test need not be used. The concept of glucose tolerance was originally based on the development of glycosuria after oral glucose, so that with their higher renal threshold, older individuals would be expected to show "better" glucose tolerance. Osler reported diabetes as infrequent when studied in 1892. Assessment of the blood glucose response to oral glucose began around 1920, with evidence of worsening glycemic response with age in almost all analyses. This may be due to disease, medicines, physical activity, physical conditioning, or change in body composition, but even while taking these into account, age is significantly associated with the response to a glucose load. The Baltimore Longitudinal study, which began in 1962, has shown that glucose tolerance declines with age, with particular worsening of the 2-h glucose rather than the fasting glucose, so that "if you try to come up with one number" for use of fasting rather than 2-h glucose, "it would be meaningless" with increasing age. According to National Health and Nutrition Evaluation Study (NHANES) and Rancho Bernardo data, as well as glucose tolerance results from the Baltimore study, that compared fasting and 2-h glucose levels in Wilfred Fujimoto discussed the pathophysiology of diabetes in older individuals, with both insulin resistance and abnormal ß-cell function. Initially, in response to insulin resistance, there is an increase in insulin secretion, with subsequent failure of the compensation leading to glucose intolerance and finally to hyperglycemia of sufficient severity to diagnose diabetes. There may be altered stimulus secretion coupling of glucose as a secretagogue, or there may be altered processing, e.g. of proinsulin to insulin. Older persons have lessened peripheral sensitivity to insulin, while showing similar sensitivity of hepatic glucose production to the suppressive effect of insulin. Increased age is associated with decreased glucose tolerance with greater incremental insulin response, with euglycemic clamp data showing decreased insulin sensitivity. Younger individuals also show increased muscle blood flow in response to hyperglycemia, but this is not seen in older persons, suggesting resistance to the vasodilatory effect of insulin with age. With a 100-g oral glucose tolerance test over 270 min, older individuals show higher blood glucose, with a delay in the rise in arterial insulin levels, suggesting a component of insulin deficiency. Other studies comparing weight- and fasting insulin- and glucose-matched older and younger individuals show somewhat higher 2-h glucose levels in the former and decreased glucose disappearance in response to insulin, suggesting insulin resistance. The effect of glucose to potentiate the insulin response to the nonglucose secretagogue arginine also decreases with age. Several studies have shown abnormal processing of proinsulin to insulin. Comparing older and younger individuals with similar glucose tolerance, proinsulin levels are higher at baseline and during glucose tolerance test in older persons, and the proinsulin-to-insulin ratio increased, suggesting decreased conversion. In studies of Japanese Americans, those who develop diabetes have ß-cell dysfunction and impaired glucose tolerance, but not decreased physical activity or increased abdominal fat. Edward Gregg, Atlanta, GA, discussed the relationship between diabetes complications and aging as well as potential preventative approaches. Diabetes was present in 19% of those aged 60 years and older in NHANES III. Census data indicate increasing prevalence of older persons in the overall population, so that the steepest increase in diabetes in the U.S. will be in individuals over age 65 years, who now comprise 40% of patients with diabetes, but will account for 65% in several decades. Cognitive impairment, physical disability, impaired social function, and impaired psychological function should all be considered potential adverse effects of diabetes. Cognitive impairment develops in one-third of women and one-sixth of men over age 55 years and may be increased with diabetes, perhaps because of hyperglycemia, hypoglycemia, polypharmacy, the need for repeated surgery, vascular disease, or a common genetic predisposing factor for both diabetes and dementia. In the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures, diabetes status was associated with worse cognitive function among women and with a 60% greater risk of a major decline in cognitive function, with increasing duration of diabetes particularly associated with cognitive decline (5). There are five additional studies that have addressed this question; four have confirmed this relationship between diabetes and cognitive decline. Addressing clinically diagnosed dementia, the Rotterdam Study (6) of 6,000 adults showed a doubled prevalence of dementia among individuals with diabetes, with a fourfold increase in patients treated with insulin, which presumably is a marker of diabetes severity. Physical disability is an important factor in quality of life, affecting 20% of the older population. NHANES III data show that inability of women aged 65 years and older to perform a variety of physical tasks was more than doubled with diabetes. Among individuals with and without diabetes without physical disability at baseline, those with diabetes have a twofold likelihood of developing physical disability, in part because of retinopathy and neuropathy. Women with diabetes have a greater risk of falling, presumably due to impaired physical function, so that although their bone density is higher, they have a greater risk of hip fracture than individuals without diabetes. Diabetes is also associated with psychiatric illness, with 11% of patients having major depression. Gregg noted that improving glycemic, lipid, or blood pressure control may not improve cognition. The Systolic Hypertension in Europe Trial showed decreased dementia with blood pressure treatment ( 7). Intervention to improve physical disability and other quality of life outcomes has not been studied, although there is evidence that healthy lifestyle leads to a lag in the onset of disability. Jeffrey Halter, Ann Arbor, MI, discussed the challenge of treating diabetes in older people, with 2025% of the older population having diabetes. Risks of adverse micro- and macrovascular outcome increase with increasing degrees of hyperglycemia, with 2-h postchallenge hyperglycemia particularly associated with adverse outcomes. He pointed out that the typical individual aged 65 and 75 years has an average remaining life expectancy of 18 and 12 years, respectively, and thus can certainly benefit from effective treatment. References
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||