Diabetes Care
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Janssen, I.
Right arrow Articles by Ross, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Janssen, I.
Right arrow Articles by Ross, R.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Diabetes Care 25:431-438, 2002
© 2002 by the American Diabetes Association, Inc.

Clinical Care/Education/Nutrition
Original Article

Effects of an Energy-Restrictive Diet With or Without Exercise on Abdominal Fat, Intermuscular Fat, and Metabolic Risk Factors in Obese Women

Ian Janssen, PHD1, Anne Fortier, MSC1, Robert Hudson, MD, PHD2 and Robert Ross, PHD1,2

1 School of Physical and Health Education, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
2 School of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada


   ABSTRACT
TOP
 ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
 RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 CONCLUSIONS
 Summary
 References
 
OBJECTIVE—The primary objective was to examine whether the combination of diet and aerobic exercise (DA) or diet and resistance exercise (DR) is associated with greater improvements in metabolic risk factors by comparison to diet only (DO) in obese women. A second objective considered whether reductions in metabolic risk factors are related to concurrent changes in abdominal and/or intermuscular fat distribution.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—A total of 38 premenopausal obese women were randomly assigned to one of three 16-week treatments: DO (n=13), DA (n=11), or DR (n=14). Plasma glucose, insulin, and lipid levels were measured in a fasting state and after a 75-g oral glucose challenge (oral glucose tolerance test [OGTT]). Total, abdominal subcutaneous, visceral, and intermuscular fat were measured by magnetic resonance imaging.

RESULTS—Significant reductions (P < 0.02) in body weight (~10 kg or 10%) and in total, abdominal subcutaneous, visceral, and intermuscular fat were observed within each group. Fasting and OGTT insulin, total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, and apolipoprotein B also decreased within each group (P <= 0.02). The changes in the body fat and metabolic variables were not different across treatment (P > 0.05). Visceral fat alone was related to the metabolic risk factors both before and after the treatment.

CONCLUSIONS—Weight loss was associated with reductions in metabolic risk factors in obese women. The improvement in the metabolic profile was not enhanced by the addition of aerobic or resistance exercise. The findings reinforce the importance of diminished visceral fat in the treatment of insulin resistance.

Abbreviations: DA, diet and aerobic exercise • DO, diet only • DR, diet and resistance exercise • MRI, magnetic resonance imaging • OGTT, oral glucose tolerance test • WHR, waist-to-hip ratio


   INTRODUCTION
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 CONCLUSIONS
 Summary
 References
 
The prevalence of obesity and associated comorbidities is increasing (1,2), which underscores the importance of developing effective strategies for reducing obesity and the risk of metabolic disease in women. Diet-induced weight loss (3–5) as well as aerobic exercise (6–8) and resistance exercise (7–9) are effective treatments for reducing metabolic risk factors in women. Although these observations suggest that the combination of diet and exercise would have a greater effect on metabolic risk factors than weight loss alone, the influence of diet and exercise combined in women is unclear. Whereas some studies report greater improvements in the plasma lipid profile in response to the combination of diet and exercise than diet alone (10–12), others report no treatment differences (13–15). It is also reported that the addition of aerobic (16,17) or resistance (16) exercise does not enhance the reductions in plasma insulin and glucose levels in comparison to diet alone in obese women. These observations do not reflect those in a recent report in obese men wherein a twofold greater improvement in insulin action was observed in response to diet combined with aerobic or resistance exercise than diet alone (18). A rationale that explains the equivocal findings is unknown; however, taken together, these observations suggest that the utility of exercise to enhance the effects of diet-induced weight loss on the metabolic profile may be sex-dependent. Given the importance of clearly establishing an independent role for exercise in the treatment of obesity and related comorbidities, the primary objective of this study was to examine whether the combination of diet and aerobic or resistance exercise is associated with greater improvements in metabolic risk factors by comparison to diet alone in obese women.

The second objective of this study was to clarify whether the reductions in metabolic risk factors with weight loss are related to concurrent changes in whole-body and regional adiposity. Recent studies have also shown that an increased muscle lipid content is a strong marker of insulin resistance (19–22). Furthermore, although it is clear that the changes in abdominal obesity are more closely related to changes in metabolic variables than the degree of obesity per se (18,23–25), controversy exists as to whether abdominal subcutaneous or visceral fat is responsible for these relationships (26).


   RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS
RESULTS
 CONCLUSIONS
 Summary
 References
 
Subjects
Subjects were recruited from the general population. Inclusion criteria were that the subjects were upper-body obese (BMI >27.0 kg/m2; waist-to-hip ratio [WHR; using umbilicus waist circumference] >0.85), had a stable weight (+2 kg) in the 6 months before the study, took no medications (e.g., oral contraceptives), consumed on average less than two alcoholic beverages per day, were premenopausal, and had a regular menstrual cycle. Those subjects meeting the criteria were randomly assigned to one of three treatments: diet only (DO), diet and aerobic exercise (DA), or diet and resistance exercise (DR). A total of 38 women completed the study. The descriptive characteristics for all groups are presented in Table 1 (DO, n=13; DA, n=11; DR, n=14). There were no group differences for any of the body composition or metabolic variables before treatment (P > 0.05). All subjects gave their written informed consent to participate in the study, which was conducted according to the ethical guidelines of Queen’s University.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 1— Descriptive characteristics of subjects at baseline

 
Measurement of total and regional fat and skeletal muscle by magnetic resonance imaging
Whole-body (41 images) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data were obtained with a Siemens 1.5-Tesla scanner (Erlangen, Germany) using an established protocol (27). The MRI data were transferred to a stand-alone work station (Silicon Graphics, Mountain View, CA) for analysis using special software (TomoVision, Montreal, Canada) as described elsewhere (27,28). Total fat (subcutaneous + visceral + intrapelvic + intrathoracic + intermuscular), intermuscular fat (fat intertwined between the bundles of skeletal muscle fibers that was visible on the MRI images), and skeletal muscle mass were determined using all 41 images. Visceral and abdominal subcutaneous fat were calculated using the five images extending from 5 cm below to 15 cm above L4-L5. Volume units (liters) was converted to mass units (kg) by multiplying the volumes by the assumed constant densities of 0.92 for adipose tissue and 1.04 for skeletal muscle (29). With the exception of intermuscular fat, a detailed description of the MRI results is published elsewhere (30).

We have previously reported that the mean difference for repeat measurements of total, abdominal subcutaneous, and visceral fat are <3, 1, and <6%, respectively (31). We have also shown that MRI-measured intermuscular fat is strongly correlated (r=0.92, P < 0.001) with intermuscular fat measured in corresponding cadaver sections (28). However, the standard error of the estimate for repeated measures of intermuscular fat is 30% (28).

Anthropometric variables
Body mass was measured to the nearest 0.1 kg with the subjects dressed in light clothing. Standing height was measured to the nearest 0.1 cm using a stadiometer. Circumference measurements were taken with the subjects in a standing position at the level of the last rib and hip (32).

Metabolic variables
All biochemical studies were performed within the first 10 days of the subjects’ menstrual cycle after an overnight fast. The posttreatment measurements were obtained 5–13 days after completing the treatment while the subjects were consuming a weight maintenance diet. Glucose and insulin levels were also measured in response to a 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). Blood samples were collected at 0, 60, 120, and 180 min. Glucose and insulin areas under the curve were determined using a trapezoid model (33). The OGTT insulin sensitivity index was determined using the glucose and insulin levels at 0, 120, and 180 min according to the method of Mari et al. (34). The OGTT insulin sensitivity index is highly reproducible (7% coefficient of variation) and is correlated (r=0.77, P < 0.001) with insulin sensitivity measured by the hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp (34). The OGTT plasma samples for four subjects (two DO and two DA) were damaged during shipment. Therefore, OGTT data are only presented for 11 subjects in the DO group and 9 subjects in the DA group.

Serum total cholesterol and triglyceride levels were determined using standard techniques. HDL cholesterol was assayed after isoelectric-polyanionic precipitation of HDL cholesterol. The LDL cholesterol was subsequently determined using the following equation: LDL cholesterol=cholesterol - [HDL cholesterol + (0.46 x triglycerides)]. Apolipoprotein A and B levels were determined by rate nephelometry using reagents obtained from Beckman Instruments (Fullerton, CA). Blood glucose was measured using the glucose oxidase method (Beckman Glucose Analyzer; Beckman Instruments), and plasma insulin was measured by radioimmunoassay (35).

Diet and exercise regimens
Dietary protocol.
The subjects’ energy requirements were estimated by multiplying the Harris-Benedict equation (36) by a factor of 1.5, which is within ~8% of actual energy requirements (37). A weight maintenance diet was followed at this energy intake for 2 weeks before the pretreatment testing. For the 16-week treatment, the subjects in all three groups were asked to reduce their weight maintenance energy intake by 1,000 kcal/day. All foods were self-selected, store bought, and prepared by the subjects, and no supplements were prescribed. All subjects were required to keep daily diet records for the duration of the study and to limit their dietary fat intake to <30%. The diet records were reviewed using standard food tables (38). All subjects attended weekly meetings to obtain dietary counsel and discuss success strategies. After the 16-week treatment period, the energy intake for weight maintenance was recalculated and prescribed until completion of the posttest measurements.

Aerobic exercise protocol.
A total of 11 women performed aerobic exercise 5 days per week in addition to the energy restriction. The exercise sessions lasted ~15 min at the beginning and progressed to a maximum of 60 min based on the subject’s capabilities. The mode of aerobic exercise was determined by the subject and consisted of either walking on a motorized treadmill (Quinton Instruments, Seattle, WA), cycling on a cycle ergometer (Monark, Stockholm, Sweden), or stair stepping on an electronic stairmaster (StairMaster 4000; Tri-Tech, Tulsa, OK). Exercise intensity was monitored using a heart rate monitor (Polar USA, Stanford, CT) and progressed from 50 to 85% of the maximal heart rate that was achieved during the maximal oxygen uptake test. All of the exercise sessions were by appointment and were supervised by a physical educator.

Resistance training protocol.
In addition to the energy deficient diet, 14 women performed resistance exercise 3 days per week using Nautilus equipment (Nautilus, Deland, FL). Training sessions began with a 5- to 10-min warm-up of low-intensity cycling. Seven exercises were performed in each session: leg extension, leg flexion, super pullover (latissimus dorsi), bench press, shoulder press, triceps extension, and biceps curl. One set of 8–12 repetitions were performed to the point of volitional fatigue (i.e., the individual could not complete any more repetitions). For each repetition, the concentric contraction phase was performed in ~2 s and the eccentric contraction phase in ~4 s. As soon as 12 repetitions could be performed at a given weight with good form, the weight was increased by an amount (i.e., one plate) that permitted ~8 repetitions to be performed. Sit-ups were also performed for the abdominal muscles. Each session lasted ~30 min. All exercise sessions were supervised by a physical educator who provided verbal encouragement to help ensure that physiological failure was reached and that proper lifting techniques were used.

With the exception of the exercise programs in the DA and DR groups, no physical activity prescription was given, and all women were asked to maintain their normal (i.e., prestudy) physical activity patterns for the duration of the study.

Evaluation of training performance
Cardiorespiratory fitness (V2max).
V2max was determined using a treadmill test that used a constant walking speed. For the initial 2 min, the grade was set at 0%, after which time it was increased to 2% for the third minute and by 1% every minute thereafter until fatigue was reached. Standard open-circuit spirometry techniques using a Beckman metabolic measurement cart (Sensormedics, Fullerton, CA) were used to determine oxygen uptake.

Muscular strength.
Increases in strength were determined using the following formula: [(a - b)/a] x 100, where a equals the weight lifted at the beginning of week 4, and b equals the weight lifted at the completion of the program. Week 4 was chosen as the initial week to represent changes in muscular strength that were primarily due to skeletal muscle hypertrophy, thereby omitting initial increases in strength that were predominately attributable to neuromuscular factors (39). A linear relationship between the seven- to ten-repetition maximum and the one-repetition maximum both before (r=0.94) and after training (r=0.95) have been shown with a Nautilus training program (40). Increases in upper-body strength were calculated using the bench press and super pullover exercises, whereas lower-body strength changes were determined using the leg extension and leg curl exercises.

Energy cost of exercise
Aerobic exercise.
The energy expenditure of treadmill walking and stationary cycling were determined using the American College of Sports Medicine equations (41). Because energy expenditure values with a StairMaster 4000 are ~20% lower that those determined using the equation provided by the equipment manufacturer (42), energy expenditure values obtained with the stair stepper were reduced by 20%.

Resistance exercise.
The energy expenditure was estimated to be 120 kcal per session of resistance exercise (43).

Statistical analysis
The normality of distribution of each variable was tested, and log-transformed data were used when necessary. A one-way ANOVA, with the pretreatment score acting as the dependent variable, was performed to examine differences between the groups before the intervention. Paired t tests were used to assess within-group changes (pre- to posttreatment) for all dependent variables. Bonferonni adjustments (P < 0.02, 0.05/number of groups) were used to interpret all t test results. A two-way repeated measures ANOVA, with the pre- and posttreatment scores acting as the dependent variables, was used to evaluate treatment effects for all dependent variables. When the ANOVA P value was <0.05, a Scheffé post hoc comparison test was used to locate specific pretreatment differences and main treatment effects. Pearson product-moment correlations were used to determine the simple relationship between the different MRI and metabolic variables. Multiple regression analysis was used to determine whether visceral fat predicted the metabolic variables after controlling for total, abdominal subcutaneous, and intermuscular fat. Statistical procedures were performed using SYSTAT (SYSTAT, Evanston, IL). All data are presented as means ±SD.


   RESULTS
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS
 RESULTS
CONCLUSIONS
 Summary
 References
 
Evaluation of diet and exercise
Dietary analysis.
With few exceptions (<2%), complete dietary intake records were submitted, as required by all subjects. The daily diet records indicated that the average dietary-induced energy deficit for the DO, DA, and DR groups were 1,222 ±293, 1,299 ±215, and 1,209 ±211 kcal/day for the 16-week treatment period. The corresponding fat intakes were 21 ±5, 25 ±5, and 22 ±5%. There were no group differences for the energy deficit or fat intakes (P > 0.1).

Aerobic exercise.
Attendance for the exercise sessions averaged 92% (range 85–98%) in the DA group. The duration of the exercise sessions was 34 ±6 min at an intensity of 77 ±4% of the maximal heart rate. The total energy expenditure for the DA group was 19,167 ±4,461 kcal. In response to the aerobic exercise program, V2max (l/min) increased (P < 0.02) by 9 ±9%. V2max did not change in the DO or DR groups (P > 0.02).

Resistance exercise.
For the DR group, attendance for the exercise sessions averaged 94% (79–100%). The estimated total energy expenditure for the DR group was 5,348 ±318 kcal. In response to the resistance exercise program, lower-body and upper-body training load increased by 29 ±15 and 38 ±15%, respectively (P < 0.01).

Effects of weight loss on anthropometric variables
Body weight and waist circumference were reduced within each group (P < 0.001) (Table 2); however, these changes were not different across treatment (P > 0.1). WHR did not change (P > 0.1) within any group (Table 2).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 2— Changes in anthropometric, MRI, and metabolic variables

 
Effects of weight loss on MRI variables
As indicated in Table 2, significant reductions in total, abdominal subcutaneous, visceral, and intermuscular fat were observed within each group (P < 0.01). The changes in these fat depots were not different across treatment (P > 0.05). The observations for visceral and abdominal subcutaneous fat area (cm2) at the L4-L5 image were the same as those for visceral and abdominal mass (kg) calculated using all five abdominal images. Skeletal muscle mass was preserved within the DA and DR groups (P > 0.1); however, a significant (P < 0.001) reduction in skeletal muscle mass was observed in the DO group (Table 2).

Pretreatment metabolic variables
None of the subjects had impaired glucose tolerance before treatment (44). Three subjects started with high-risk total cholesterol values (>=6.2 mmol/l), and 14 subjects started with borderline high-risk total cholesterol values (5.1–6.1 mmol/l). Three subjects started with very high-risk (>=4.9 mmol/l), nine subjects with high-risk (4.1–4.8 mmol/l), and 19 subjects with borderline high-risk (3.3–4.0 mmol/l) LDL cholesterol values. Eleven subjects started with high-risk (<1.0 mmol/l) HDL cholesterol values. One subject started with very high-risk triglyceride values (>=5.1 mmol/l), and five subjects started with high-risk triglyceride values (2.3–5.6 mmol/l). All of the remaining total, LDL, and HDL cholesterol and triglyceride values were within the desirable range (45).

Effects of weight loss on metabolic variables
Fasting glucose and insulin.
Independent of treatment, fasting plasma glucose levels did not change (P > 0.1). Fasting insulin was reduced in response to DO (P=0.002) and DR (P=0.007) but not DA (P=0.18) (Table 2). These changes were not different across treatment (P > 0.1).

OGTT.
OGTT glucose area was reduced in response to DR (P=0.017); however, OGTT glucose area did not change in response to DO (P=0.14) or DA (P=0.14) (Table 2). OGTT insulin area and the insulin sensitivity index improved in all groups (P < 0.02) (Table 2). The changes in glucose area, insulin area, and insulin sensitivity index were not different across treatment (P > 0.1).

Plasma lipids and lipoproteins.
Changes in the plasma lipids and lipoproteins are given in Table 2. Total cholesterol and apolipoprotein B were reduced (P < 0.02) in all groups. The reduction in LDL cholesterol was significant in the DO (P=0.001) and DR (P=0.02) groups alone. A slight (7%) but significant (P=0.01) reduction in HDL cholesterol was observed in the DR group. Independent of treatment, there were no changes in any of the other plasma lipid or lipoprotein variables (P > 0.05). Without exception, there were no treatment differences for the changes in the plasma lipid/lipoprotein levels (P > 0.1).

Relationship between body composition and metabolic variables
Pretreatment visceral fat was significantly (P < 0.05) correlated with OGTT glucose area (r=0.51), fasting insulin (r=0.49), OGTT insulin area (r=0.44), insulin sensitivity index (r=-0.44), and plasma triglycerides (r=0.32) in all 38 subjects. These correlations persisted throughout the treatment because the posttreatment values for visceral fat were significantly (P < 0.05) related to the posttreatment values for OGTT glucose area (r=0.33), fasting insulin (r=0.52), OGTT insulin area (r=0.37), and insulin sensitivity index (r=-0.44). Furthermore, when the posttreatment values for visceral fat were plotted against OGTT glucose, fasting insulin, OGTT insulin, and the insulin sensitivity index, the relationships fell along the same regression lines as the corresponding pretreatment values. Both before and after treatment, the correlations for visceral fat remained significant after controlling for total, abdominal subcutaneous, and intermuscular fat (data not shown). With the exception of total fat, which was related to the OGTT insulin sensitivity index (r=-0.34, P=0.05), none of the other body fat variables were related to any of the metabolic variables (i.e., glucose, insulin, lipids/lipoproteins) before treatment (P > 0.05). None of the change scores for the body fat variables were related to the change scores for any of the metabolic variables (P > 0.05). Without exception, the observations for visceral and abdominal subcutaneous fat area (cm2) at the L4-L5 level were the same as those for visceral and abdominal mass (kg) calculated using all five abdominal images.


   CONCLUSIONS
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 CONCLUSIONS
Summary
 References
 
The effects of weight loss alone or weight loss combined with aerobic or resistance training on metabolic risk factors and abdominal adiposity were studied in obese premenopausal women. The findings demonstrate that a moderate weight loss (~10 kg or 10%) was associated with a significant reduction in numerous metabolic risk factors, which appeared to be partially mediated by the corresponding reductions in visceral fat. However, the addition of aerobic or resistance exercise to the energy-restrictive diet did not enhance the improvement in the metabolic profile.

In this study, weight loss was associated with reduced levels of total and LDL cholesterol, apolipoprotein B, and fasting insulin. This is noteworthy because these variables are independent predictors of ischemic heart disease (46,47) and thus reinforce the importance of weight loss in the treatment of dyslipidemia and hyperinsulinemia. That weight loss had no effect on plasma triglycerides, HDL cholesterol, or glucose variables may be explained by the relatively normal lipid and glucose tolerance levels for most subjects before treatment. Indeed, the reductions observed for many of the metabolic variables were positively correlated with pretreatment values (data not shown), a finding in agreement with previous studies wherein the effectiveness of weight loss as a therapeutic strategy was particularly useful for individuals with dyslipidemia and/or glucose intolerance (3,48).

In agreement with previous studies in overweight premenopausal women (13–15,49), postmenopausal women (17,50), and men (15,51), in this study, the addition of aerobic or resistance exercise to the energy-restrictive diet did not enhance the changes in the lipid profile. Common to these studies, diet and exercise combined was not associated with an increase in weight loss compared with diet alone. Given the importance of weight and/or fat loss in the treatment of disturbances in plasma lipids and lipoproteins, it is not unreasonable to assume that the inability of exercise to induce an added benefit is at least partially explained by the inability of exercise to increase the reduction in total or abdominal adiposity. This is consistent with the observation that exercise in the absence of weight loss has little or no effect on the plasma lipid profile (12,15,52,53). In this way, it is suggested that improvement in obesity-related dyslipidemias may best be accomplished by the prescription of prolonged (30–60 min/day) low-intensity (50–60% V2max) exercise on all or most days of the week (24,54–56). In as much as weight loss contributes to improvements in lipid profile, a regimen of this nature is more likely to result in exercise-induced weight loss that is associated with reduction in obesity and related comorbidities (24,55).

Consistent with our findings for lipid profile, we observed no clear benefit of aerobic or resistance exercise on glucose tolerance or insulin action. These observations agree with earlier findings in pre- (16) and postmenopausal (17) overweight women. However, this is contrary to our recent observation in obese men wherein the combination of diet and aerobic or resistance exercise induced a twofold greater improvement in insulin action when compared with diet alone (18). Because the baseline insulin levels for the men and women within the respective studies were similar, the study designs (i.e., diet and exercise regimens) were identical, and the relative reduction in total and regional adiposity by comparison to the DO groups were not different, a rationale that explains the equivocal findings is unknown. Moreover, we are unaware of mechanisms (e.g., estrogen) that would support the view that sex independently contributes to the effects of exercise alone on insulin sensitivity.

That exercise did not enhance the improvement in the metabolic profile observed in response to diet alone does not argue against a role for exercise in improving health risk. On the contrary, it is well established that elevated levels of physical activity (57,58) and fitness (58,59) are inversely related to morbidity and mortality independent of obesity and disturbances in metabolic risk factors. Furthermore, a single bout of exercise reduces plasma triglycerides, increases HDL cholesterol, and improves insulin sensitivity for up to 72 h (60–62). Accordingly, because we acquired our metabolic measurements at least 96 h after exercise, our findings reinforce the notion that in the absence of changes in total or regional fat, the positive effects of exercise on metabolic risk factors attenuate quickly. Thus, adherence to exercise is required to maintain the improvement in metabolic profile.

A secondary aim of this study was to investigate the influence of weight loss on the relationships between visceral fat, abdominal subcutaneous fat, intermuscular fat, and metabolic risk factors. The principal finding was that visceral fat was uniquely related to a number of the metabolic variables both before and after treatment. Furthermore, when plotting visceral fat against the metabolic variables (e.g., insulin sensitivity index), the posttest regression lines fell essentially on top of the pretest regression lines. Although this result does not infer a cause-and-effect relationship, it does suggest that the relationship between visceral fat and metabolic risk factors persists after weight loss. This finding agrees with previous observations in both sexes (18,23–25) and reinforces the importance of decreasing visceral fat in the treatment of the metabolic syndrome. That the pretreatment and changes in abdominal subcutaneous fat were not related to metabolic risk factors is consistent with findings in obese women (5,63,64) but disagrees with findings in obese men (18).

Lipid accumulation within skeletal muscle is also altered in obesity and is linked to insulin resistance (22,65,66). In the present study, glucose and insulin variables were not related to skeletal muscle composition, as determined by the amount of intermuscular fat. This observation may reflect limitations inherent to the MRI technique used to measure muscle composition. We have previously reported that the error for estimating intermuscular fat by MRI approximates 30% (28). Because the reduction in intermuscular fat approximated 24%, our study may lack the power required to detect relationships between corresponding changes in intermuscular fat and metabolic risk factors.


   Summary
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 CONCLUSIONS
 Summary
References
 
The results of this study demonstrate that a ~10 kg (10%) weight loss is associated with reductions in total and LDL cholesterol, apolipoprotein B, and insulin action in obese premenopausal women. However, no additional benefit of aerobic or resistance exercise training on metabolic risk factors was observed. It would appear that the failure of exercise to enhance diet-induced improvements in insulin and glucose metabolism may be sex-dependent. Accordingly, there is a need for well-controlled randomized trials wherein the influence of sex on the effects of exercise on obesity and related comorbidities is compared. Finally, the findings reinforce the importance of diminished visceral fat in the reduction of insulin resistance.


   Acknowledgments
 
Acknowledgments

This research was supported by a Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada grant (OGPIN 030) (to R.R.). I.J. was supported by a Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada Research Trainee award.

The authors are indebted to the participants of this study for their enthusiasm and cooperation; to the graduate students who assisted with the data collection, exercise supervision, and dietary counseling; and to Diana Hall and Cindy Little for their technical assistance.


   Footnotes
 
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Robert Ross, PhD, School of Physical and Health Education, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada, K7L 3N6. E-mail: rossr{at}post.queensu.ca.

Received for publication 23 May 2001 and accepted in revised form 15 November 2001.

R.H. has received financial support from Novo Nordisk.

A table elsewhere in this issue shows conventional and Système International (SI) units and conversion factors for many substances.


   References
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 CONCLUSIONS
 Summary
 References
 

  1. National Institutes of Health, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute: Clinical guidelines on the identification, evaluation, and treatment of overweight and obesity in adults: the evidence report. Obes Res 6:S51–S210, 1998
  2. World Health Organization: Obesity: Preventing and Managing the Global Epidemic. Geneva, World Health Org., 1998 (WHO/NUT/NCD/98.1.)
  3. Wing RR, Jeffery RW: Effect of modest weight loss on changes in cardiovascular risk factors: are there differences between men and women or between weight loss and maintenance? Int J Obes 19:67–73, 1995
  4. Olefsky J, Reaven G, Farquhar JW: Effects of weight reduction on obesity: studies of lipid and carbohydrate metabolism in normal and hyperlipoproteinemic subjects. J Clin Invest 53:64–76, 1974
  5. Fujioka S, Matsuzawa Y, Tokunaga K, Kawamoto T, Kobatake T, Keno Y, Kotan K, Yoshida S, Tarui S: Improvements of glucose and lipid metabolism associated with selective reduction of intra-abdominal visceral fat in premenopausal women with visceral fat obesity. Int J Obes 15:853–859, 1991[Medline]
  6. DeFronzo RA, Sherwin RS, Kraemer N: Effect of physical training on insulin action in obesity. Diabetes 36:1379–1385, 1987[Abstract]
  7. Henriksson J: Influence of exercise on insulin sensitivity. J Cardiovasc Risk 2:303–309, 1995[Medline]
  8. Haskell WL: The influence of exercise training on plasma lipids and lipoproteins in health and disease. Acta Med Scand 711:25–37, 1986
  9. Ryan AS, Pratley RE, Goldberg AP, Elahi D: Resistive training increases insulin action in postmenopausal women. J Gerontol 51A:M199–M205, 1996
  10. Nieman DC, Haig JL, Fairchild KS, De Guia ED, Dizon GP, Register UD: Reducing-diet and exercise-training effects on serum lipids and lipoproteins in mildly obese women. Am J Clin Nutr 52:640–645, 1990[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Wood PD, Stefanick ML, Williams PT, Haskell WL: The effects on plasma lipoproteins of a prudent weight-reducing diet, with or without exercise, in overweight men and women. N Engl J Med 325:461–466, 1991[Abstract]
  12. Stefanick ML, Mackey S, Sheehan M, Ellsworth N, Haskell WL, Wood PD: Effects of diet and exercise in men and postmenopausal women with low levels of HDL cholesterol and high levels of LDL cholesterol. N Engl J Med 339:12–20, 1998[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Kraemer WJ, Volek JS, Clark KL, Gordon SE, Incledon T, Puhl SM, Triplett-McBride NT, McBride JM, Putukian M, Sebastianelli WJ: Physiological adaptations to a weight-loss dietary regimen and exercise programs in women. J Appl Physiol 83:270–279, 1997[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. VanDale D, Saris WH, Schoffelen PF, Tenhoor F: Does exercise give an additional effect in weight reduction regimens? Int J Obes 11:367–375, 1987[Medline]
  15. Hagan RD, Upton SJ, Wong L, Whittam J: The effects of aerobic conditioning and/or caloric restriction in overweight men and women. Med Sci Sports Exer 18:87–94, 1986[Medline]
  16. Weinstock RS, Hiliang D, Wadden TA: Diet and exercise in the treatment of obesity: effects of 3 interventions on insulin resistance. Arch Intern Med 158:2477–2483, 1998[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Fox AA, Thompson JL, Butterfield GE, Gylfodottir U, Moynihan S, Spiller G: Effects of diet and exercise on common cardiovascular disease risk factors in moderately obese older women. Am J Clin Nutr 63:225–233, 1996[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Rice B, Janssen I, Hudson R, Ross R: Effects of exercise and/or diet on insulin, glucose, and abdominal adipose tissue in obese men. Diabetes Care 22:684–691, 1999[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Goodpaster BH, Thaete FL, Kelley DE: Thigh adipose tissue distribution is associated with insulin resistance in obesity and in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Am J Clin Nutr 71:885–892, 2000[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Pan DA, Lillijoa S, Kriketos AD, Milner MR, Baur LA, Bogardus C, Jenkins AB, Storlien LH: Skeletal muscle triglyceride levels are inversely related to insulin action. Diabetes 46:983–988, 1997[Abstract]
  21. Jacob S, Machann J, Rett K, Brechtel K, Volk A, Renn W, Maerker E, Matthaei S, Schick F, Claussen C-D, Häring H-H: Association of increased intramyocellular lipid content with insulin resistance in lean nondiabetic offspring of type 2 diabetic subjects. Diabetes 48:1113–1119, 1999[Abstract]
  22. Manco M, Mingrove G, Greco AV, Capristo E, Gniuli D, DeGaetana A, Gasbarrinni G: Insulin resistance directly correlates with increased saturated fatty acids in skeletal muscle triglycerides. Metabolism 49:220–224, 2000[Medline]
  23. Mourier A, Gautier J-F, De Kerviler E, Bigard AX, Villette J-M, Garnier J-P, Duvallet A, Guezennec CY, Cathelineau G: Mobilization of visceral adipose tissue related to the improvement insulin sensitivity in response to physical training in NIDDM: effects of branched-chain amino acid supplements. Diabetes Care 20:385–391, 1997[Abstract]
  24. Ross R, Dagnone D, Jones PJ, Smith H, Paddags A, Hudson R, Janssen I: Reduction in obesity and related comorbid conditions after diet-induced weight loss or exercise-induced weight loss in men: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 133:92–103, 2000[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Goodpaster BH, Kelley DE, Wing RR, Meier A, Thaete FL: Effects of weight loss on regional fat distribution and insulin sensitivity in obesity. Diabetes 48:839–847, 1999[Abstract]
  26. Frayne KN: Visceral fat and insulin resistance: causative or correlative? Br J Nutr 83:S71–S77, 2000
  27. Ross R, Rissanen J, Pedwell H, Clifford J, Shragge P: Influence of diet and exercise on skeletal muscle and visceral adipose tissue in men. J Appl Physiol 81:2445–2455, 1996[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Mitsiopoulos N, Baumgartner RN, Heymsfield SB, Lyons W, Gallagher D, Ross R: Cadaver validation of skeletal muscle measurement by magnetic resonance imaging and computerized tomography. J Appl Physiol 85:115–122, 1998[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Snyder WS, Cooke MJ, Manssett ES, Larhansen LT, Howells GP, Tipton IH: Report of the Task Group on Reference Man. Oxford, U.K., Pergamon, 1975
  30. Janssen I, Ross R: Effects of sex on the changes in visceral, subcutaneous adipose tissue and skeletal muscle with weight loss. Int J Obes 23:1035–1046, 1999
  31. Ross R, Léger L, Morris DV, de Guise J, Guardo R: Quantification of adipose tissue by MRI: relationship with anthropometric variables. J Appl Physiol 72:787–795, 1992[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Lohman TG, Roche AF, Martello R (Eds.): Anthropometric Standardization Reference Manual. Champaign, IL, Human Kinetics, 1988
  33. Allison DB, Paultre F, Maggio C, Mezzitis N, Pi-Sunyer FX: The use of areas under curves in diabetes research. Diabetes Care 18:245–250, 1995[Abstract]
  34. Mari A, Pacini G, Murphy E, Ludvik B, Nolan JJ: A model-based method for assessing insulin sensitivity from the oral glucose tolerance test. Diabetes Care 24:539–548, 2001[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Fantus IG, Brosseau N: Mechanism of action of metformin: insulin receptor and post-receptor effects in vitro and in vivo. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 63:898–905, 1986[Abstract]
  36. Harris JA, Benedict F: A Biometric Study of Basal Metabolism. Washington, DC, Carnegie Institution of Washington, 1919 (publ. no. 279)
  37. Mahalko JR, Johnson LK: Accuracy of predictions of long-term energy needs. J Am Diet Assoc 77:557–561, 1980[Medline]
  38. Katahn M, Pope J: The T-Factor Fat Gram Counter. New York, W.W. Norton, 1994
  39. Sale DG: Neural adaptations in strength and power training. In Human Muscle Power. Jones NL, McCartney N, McComas AJ, Eds. Champaign, IL, Human Kinetics, 1986, p. 289–307
  40. Braith RW, Graves JE, Leggett SH, Pollock ML: Effect of training on the relationship between maximal and submaximal strength. Med Sci Sports Exer 25:132–138, 1993[Medline]
  41. American College of Sports Medicine: Appendix D: metabolic calculations. In Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription. 4th ed. Pate RR, Blair SN, Durstine JL, Eddy DO, Hanson P, Painter P, Smith LK, Wolfe LA, Eds. Philadelphia, Lea & Febiger, 1991, p. 293–298
  42. Howley ET, Calacino DL, Swenson TC: Factors affecting the oxygen cost for stepping on an electronic stepping ergometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc 24:1055–1058, 1991
  43. Ballor DL, Katch VL, Becque MD, Marks CR: Resistance weight training during caloric restriction enhances lean body weight maintenance. Am J Clin Nutr 47:19–25, 1988[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. World Health Organization: Diabetes Mellitus: Report of a WHO Study Group. Geneva, World Health Organization, 1985 (Tech. Rep. Ser., no. 727)
  45. Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults: Summary of the Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (adult treatment panel III). JAMA 285:2486–2497, 2001[Free Full Text]
  46. Després J-P, Lamarche B, Mauriege P, Cantin B, Dagenais GR, Moorjani S, Lupien PJ: Hyperinsulinemia as an independent risk factor for ischemic heart disease. N Engl J Med 334:952–957, 1996[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Lamarche B, Tchernof A, Mauriege P, Cantin B, Dagenais GR, Lupien PJ, Després J-P: Fasting insulin and apolipoprotein B levels and low-density lipoprotein particle size as risk factors for ischemic heart disease. JAMA 279:1955–1961, 1998[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Després J-P, Lamarche B: Effects of diet and physical activity on adiposity and body fat distribution: implications for the prevention of cardiovascular disease. Nutr Res Rev 6:137–159, 1993
  49. Hammer RL, Barrier CA, Roundy ES, Bradford JM, Fisher AG: Calorie-restricted low-fat diet and exercise in obese women. Am J Clin Nutr 49:77–85, 1989[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  50. Svendsen OL, Hassager C, Christiansen C: Effect of an energy-restrictive diet, with or without exercise, on lean tissue mass, resting metabolic rate, cardiovascular risk factors, and bone in overweight postmenopausal women. Am J Med 95:131–140, 1993[Medline]
  51. Kraemer WJ, Volek JS, Clark KL, Gordon SE, Puhl SM, Koziris LP, McBride JM, Triplett-McBride NT, Putukian M, Newton RU, Hakkinen K, Bush JA, Sebastianelli WJ: Influence of exercise training on physiological and performance changes with weight loss in men. Med Sci Sports Exer 31:1320–1329, 1999[Medline]
  52. Manning JM, Dooly-Manning CR, White K, Silas S, Kesselhaut M, Ruoff M: Effects of a resistance training program on lipoprotein-lipid levels in obese women. Med Sci Sports Exerc 23:1222–1226, 1991[Medline]
  53. Santiago MC, Leon AS, Serfass RC: Failure of 40 weeks of brisk walking to alter blood lipids in normolipemic women. Can J Appl Physiol 20:417–428, 1995[Medline]
  54. Després J-P, Lamarche B: Low-intensity endurance exercise training, plasma lipoproteins and the risk of coronary heart disease. J Intern Med 236:7–22, 1994[Medline]
  55. Ross R, Freeman JA, Janssen I: Exercise alone is an effective strategy for reducing obesity and related co-morbidities. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 28:165–179, 2000[Medline]
  56. Ross R, Janssen I: Physical activity, total and regional obesity: dose-response considerations. Med Sci Sports Exerc 33:S521–S527, 2001[Medline]
  57. Paffenbarger RS Jr, Wing AL, Hyde RT: Physical activity as an index of heart attack in college alumni. Am J Epidemiol 108:161–175, 1978[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  58. Whatley MA, Kaminsky LA: Epidemiology and physical activity, physical fitness, and selected chronic diseases. In ACSM’s Resource Manual for Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription. 3rd ed. Roitman JL, Kelsey M, LaFontaine TP, Southard DR, Williams MA, York T, Eds. Baltimore, MD, Williams & Wilkins, 1998, p. 13–26
  59. Blair SN, Kampert JB, Kohl HW, Barlow CE, Macera CA, Paffenbargar RS Jr, Gibbons LW: Influences of cardiorespiratory fitness and other precursors on cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality in men and women. JAMA 276:205–210, 1996[Abstract]
  60. Thompson PD, Crouse SF, Goodpaster BH, Kelley DE, Moyna N, Pescattelo L: The acute versus chronic response to exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 33:5438–5445, 2001
  61. Crouse SF, O’Brien BC, Grandjean PW, Lowe RC, Rohack JJ, Green JS: Effects of training and a single session of exercise on lipids and apolipoproteins in hypercholesterolemic men. J Appl Physiol 83:2019–2028, 1997[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  62. Perseghin G, Price TB, Petersen KF, Roden M, Cline GW, Gerow K, Rothman DL, Shulman GI: Increased glucose transport-phosphorylation and muscle glycogen synthesis after exercise training in insulin-resistant subjects. N Engl J Med 335:1357–1362, 1996[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  63. Bosello O, Zamboni M, Armellini F, Zocca I, Bergamo-Andreis IA, Smacchia C, Milani MP, Cominacini L: Modifications of abdominal fat and hepatic insulin clearance during severe caloric restriction. Ann Nutr Metab 34:359–365, 1990[Medline]
  64. Després J-P, Pouliot MC, Moorjani S, Nadeau A, Tremblay A, Lupien PJ, Thériault G, Bouchard C: Loss of abdominal fat and metabolic response to exercise training in obese women. Am J Physiol 261:E159–E167, 1991[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  65. Goodpaster BH, Kelley DE: Role of muscle in triglyceride metabolism. Curr Opin Lidol 9:231–236, 1998
  66. Kelley DE, Mandarino LJ: Fuel selection in human skeletal muscle in insulin resistance: a reexamination. Diabetes 49:677–683, 2000[Abstract]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
M. T. Durheim, C. A. Slentz, L. A. Bateman, S. K. Mabe, and W. E. Kraus
Relationships between exercise-induced reductions in thigh intermuscular adipose tissue, changes in lipoprotein particle size, and visceral adiposity
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, August 1, 2008; 295(2): E407 - E412.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
N. A. Brito, M. N. Brito, and T. J. Bartness
Differential sympathetic drive to adipose tissues after food deprivation, cold exposure or glucoprivation
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, May 1, 2008; 294(5): R1445 - R1452.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
J.-E. Yim, S. Heshka, J. B. Albu, S. Heymsfield, and D. Gallagher
Femoral-gluteal subcutaneous and intermuscular adipose tissues have independent and opposing relationships with CVD risk
J Appl Physiol, March 1, 2008; 104(3): 700 - 707.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Diabetes CareHome page
I. Janssen and W. Cramp
Cardiorespiratory Fitness Is Strongly Related to the Metabolic Syndrome in Adolescents: Response to Shaibi, Cruz, and Goran
Diabetes Care, February 1, 2008; 31(2): e9 - e9.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 EndocrinologyHome page
M. N. Brito, N. A. Brito, D. J. Baro, C. K. Song, and T. J. Bartness
Differential Activation of the Sympathetic Innervation of Adipose Tissues by Melanocortin Receptor Stimulation
Endocrinology, November 1, 2007; 148(11): 5339 - 5347.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci.Home page
L. Yao, M. J. Delmonico, S. M. Roth, B. D. Hand, J. Johns, J. Conway, L. Douglass, and B. F. Hurley
Adrenergic Receptor Genotype Influence on Midthigh Intermuscular Fat Response to Strength Training in Middle-Aged and Older Adults
J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., June 1, 2007; 62(6): 658 - 663.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF LIFESTYLE MEDICINEHome page
M. G. Flynn, B. K. McFarlin, and M. M. Markofski
State of the Art Reviews: The Anti-Inflammatory Actions of Exercise Training
American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine, May 1, 2007; 1(3): 220 - 235.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 EndocrinologyHome page
N. M. Thompson, A. M. Norman, S. S. Donkin, R. R. Shankar, M. H. Vickers, J. L. Miles, and B. H. Breier
Prenatal and Postnatal Pathways to Obesity: Different Underlying Mechanisms, Different Metabolic Outcomes
Endocrinology, May 1, 2007; 148(5): 2345 - 2354.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
L. M. Redman, L. K. Heilbronn, C. K. Martin, A. Alfonso, S. R. Smith, E. Ravussin, and for the Pennington CALERIE Team
Effect of Calorie Restriction with or without Exercise on Body Composition and Fat Distribution
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., March 1, 2007; 92(3): 865 - 872.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
E. W Demerath, W. Shen, M. Lee, A. C Choh, S. A Czerwinski, R. M Siervogel, and B. Towne
Approximation of total visceral adipose tissue with a single magnetic resonance image
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, February 1, 2007; 85(2): 362 - 368.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
E. P. Weiss, S. B. Racette, D. T. Villareal, L. Fontana, K. Steger-May, K. B. Schechtman, S. Klein, A. A. Ehsani, J. O. Holloszy, and Washington University School of Medicine CALERIE G
Lower extremity muscle size and strength and aerobic capacity decrease with caloric restriction but not with exercise-induced weight loss
J Appl Physiol, February 1, 2007; 102(2): 634 - 640.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
E. P Weiss, S. B Racette, D. T Villareal, L. Fontana, K. Steger-May, K. B Schechtman, S. Klein, J. O Holloszy, and and the Washington University School of Medicine C
Improvements in glucose tolerance and insulin action induced by increasing energy expenditure or decreasing energy intake: a randomized controlled trial.
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, November 1, 2006; 84(5): 1033 - 1042.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am J Health Syst PharmHome page
M. K. Slack
Interpreting current physical activity guidelines and incorporating them into practice for health promotion and disease prevention.
Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., September 1, 2006; 63(17): 1647 - 1653.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
V. B. O'Leary, C. M. Marchetti, R. K. Krishnan, B. P. Stetzer, F. Gonzalez, and J. P. Kirwan
Exercise-induced reversal of insulin resistance in obese elderly is associated with reduced visceral fat
J Appl Physiol