© 2002 by the American Diabetes Association, Inc.
Is HbA1c Influenced More Strongly by Preprandial or Postprandial Glycemia in Type 1 Diabetes?
1 Department of Endocrinology and Nutrition, University Hospital La Paz, Madrid, Spain The relative contribution of preprandial and postprandial glycemia to HbA1c has been the subject of increased interest in recent years; however, according to the American Diabetes Association, there are insufficient data to determine this accurately (1). The objective of our study was to evaluate the accuracy of preprandial and postprandial glycemia in predicting overall glycemic control as estimated by HbA1c in type 1 diabetes. We analyzed 112 consecutive home blood glucose records from type 1 diabetic patients who were on an intensive diabetes therapy program and who had had diabetes for >5 years. Each home blood glucose record included the blood glucose values performed before and 2 h after breakfast, lunch, and dinner during a period of 6 weeks (mean number of glucose measures performed: 237). HbA1c was measured at the end of each record period by high performance liquid chromatography. Home blood glucose monitoring was performed with the same glucose meters in all patients (One Touch Profile; Lifescan, Milipitas, CA).
Mean daily glycemia, mean preprandial glycemia, and mean postprandial glycemia values were obtained from each record. Records were classified in two groups, according to HbA1c results: good glycemic control (HbA1c <7%) and poor glycemic control (HbA1c
The study results showed that good glycemic control records (HbA1c <7%) had significantly lower glycemic values than poor glycemic control records (HbA1c The results of this study suggest that preprandial glycemia is a better predictor of overall glycemic control, as estimated by HbA1c, than postprandial glycemia in type 1 diabetes. Our data are in agreement with those recently reported in this journal by Bonora et al. (2) in type 2 diabetes and with a recent review of the available data on postprandial glucose by the American Diabetes Association (1). A higher contribution of preprandrial than postprandial glycemia to mean daily glycemia, due to the fact that more hours are spent in the interprandial period than in the postprandial one, could probably explain these findings. In fact, it was the mean daily glycemia that correlated the most strongly with HbA1c in both the study by Bonora et al. and our study as well as in most of the available studies analyzed by the American Diabetes Association (1,2). If postprandial glycemia is confirmed as an independent contributing factor in cardiovascular disease (3), the fact that preprandial glycemia is a better predictor of HbA1c than postprandial glycemia could suggest that HbA1c may not exactly reflect the harmful effects of hyperglycemia in diabetes macrovascular complications. This could explain why the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) and the U.K. Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) showed a significant improvement in glycemic control (as estimated by HbA1c) in the intensive therapy groups but did not definitely demonstrate a risk reduction in macrovascular complications. Footnotes Address correspondence and reprint requests to Natalia Hillman, MD, Unidad de Diabetes, Hospital Universitario La Paz, P. Castellana 261, 28046 Madrid, Spain. E-mail address: nataliahillman{at}terra.es. References
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||