© 2003 by the American Diabetes Association, Inc.
Intrarenal Hemodynamic Changes After Captopril Test in Patients With Type 2 DiabetesA duplex Doppler sonography study
1 Department of Metabolism, Endocrinology, and Molecular Medicine, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
OBJECTIVEACE inhibitors are known to be effective in preventing the progression of diabetic nephropathy. Activation of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) is reported to contribute to intrarenal hemodynamic abnormality in diabetic patients. We examined whether RAS blockade by captopril induces intrarenal hemodynamic changes in normotensive patients with type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODSThe patients ranged in age from 40 to 65 years (20 men and 20 women). A total of 15 age- and sex-matched healthy individuals served as control subjects. Resistive index (RI) of interlobar arteries was examined by duplex Doppler sonography before and after the oral captopril (25 mg) test.
RESULTSAt baseline, no significant differences in RI values or plasma renin activity (PRA) were seen between the patients and healthy subjects. In healthy subjects, the RI values after the captopril test were significantly higher than baseline values (P < 0.01). However, in patients with type 2 diabetes, both with normoalbuminuria and microalbuminuria, RI values after the test were significantly lower than baseline values (P < 0.001). There were significant negative correlations between CONCLUSIONSThese results indicate that the intrarenal RAS may be activated in diabetic patients, that such activation may be affected by poor glycemic control, and that blockade of RAS activation by ACE inhibitor reduces intrarenal vascular resistance in diabetic patients. The results emphasize the beneficial effects of ACE inhibition in improving intrarenal hemodynamics in diabetic patients.
Abbreviations: EDV, end-diastolic flow velocity PA, plasma aldosterone PRA, plasma renin activity PSV, peak systolic flow velocity RAS, renin-angiotensin system RI, resistive index UAE, urinary albumin excretion
Several studies ranging from pharmacology to genetics have indicated that the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) plays a role in the pathogenesis of diabetic nephropathy (1,2). Recently, hyperglycemia has been reported to induce intrarenal RAS activation in patients with type 1 diabetes (3). In type 2 diabetic patients with advanced nephropathy, intrarenal RAS activation is reported to be one of the mechanisms of renal hemodynamic changes and one of the important factors contributing to progression of diabetic nephropathy (4). In patients with both type 1 and type 2 diabetes, RAS inhibition by either ACE inhibitors or angiotensin receptor antagonists has emerged as a clear choice for prevention and treatment of diabetic nephropathy (57). Although a renoprotective effect of ACE inhibitors and angiotensin receptor antagonists has been demonstrated in diabetic nephropathy, little is known concerning the control of the renal circulation by RAS inhibition in diabetic patients. Duplex Doppler sonography is useful for detecting intrarenal hemodynamic abnormalities such as those seen in obstructive renal diseases and renal allograft rejection (8,9). We previously demonstrated that resistive index (RI) measured by duplex Doppler sonography is useful for demonstrating hemodynamic abnormalities present in diabetic nephropathy (10,11). Interestingly, application of the captopril test to renal Doppler sonography is reported to be a noninvasive and inexpensive tool in screening studies aimed at diagnosing renovascular hypertension (12). The objective of the present study was to examine whether blockade of RAS by the ACE inhibitor, captopril, has an effect on renal vascular resistance in patients with normotensive type 2 diabetes, including patients with early nephropathy, by duplex Doppler sonography. We evaluated the effect of captopril on intrarenal hemodynamic changes by examining changes in RI.
Subjects and clinical characteristics A total of 40 normotensive Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes (aged 4065 years) were enrolled. During the study period between May 1998 and April 1999, 232 diabetic patients without overt proteinuria were admitted to Osaka City University Hospital for treatment of diabetes or to attend a patient education course. Patients who met any of the exclusion criteria defined below were eliminated from the study, and the remaining patients who gave informed consent to participate in our study protocol were consecutively enrolled in the study. No patients were taking antihypertensive agents. The diagnosis of type 2 diabetes was established according to the Report of the Expert Committee on Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus (13). Patients met three additional criteria for inclusion: no episodes of ketoacidosis, no ketonuria, and insulin therapy (if any) initiated after 5 years of known disease. After admission to our diabetes ward, medical examinations were performed to exclude other renal diseases. Patients with nondiabetic or obstructive kidney disease and those with microscopic or macroscopic hematuria, abnormal urinary sediment, history of glomerulonephritis or nephroureterolithiasis, dilated renal pelvis or atrophied kidney on ultrasonography, overt proteinuria, or elevated serum creatinine concentration (>1.2 mg/dl) were excluded. No patients had a clinical history or signs of cerebrovascular disease, peripheral vascular disease, or cardiovascular disease. During admission, each patient received a special diet (2730 kcal/kg ideal body wt/day) that consisted of 50% carbohydrate, 30% fat, 20% protein, and 10 g salt per day. The study design was approved by the hospital committee on ethics. Each subject gave informed consent before entering the study. As a control, 15 age- and sex-matched subjects who visited our hospital for medical screening and gave informed consent were consecutively recruited from outpatient clinics of our hospital during the study periods. Inclusion criteria for nondiabetic control subjects were as follows: systolic blood pressure <130 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure <85 mmHg; fasting plasma glucose <126 mg/dl; no clinical history of myocardial infarction, cerebral infarction, or peripheral vascular disease; and no use of medication likely to affect renal or systemic hemodynamics.
For each diabetic patient, 24-h urine samples were collected on three consecutive days to determine the level of urinary albumin excretion (UAE) and creatinine clearance. In each patient, the level of 24-h UAE was the mean value for the 3 consecutive days. To examine the difference in responsiveness to captopril between the patients with normoalbuminuria and those with microalbuminuria, the patients were predefined as being in one of two groups: group 1, consisting of patients with UAE <30 mg/day (n = 20); and group 2, consisting of patients with UAE Blood pressure was recorded three times after a subject had rested in the supine position for at least 15 min. A standard mercury sphygmomanometer with a cuff that adapted to arm circumference was used. The systolic blood pressure was considered the point of first audibility of Korotkoff sounds, and the diastolic blood pressure was considered the point at which the Korotkoff sounds disappeared. The three measurements were averaged. In each patient, blood pressure was measured both before and 1 h after oral administration of 25 mg captopril. Information on smoking habits was obtained by a self-administered questionnaire. Lifelong exposure to smoking was estimated as the product of years of smoking and the number of cigarettes smoked daily at the time of the study (cigarette-years).
Biochemical analysis Blood samples for measuring plasma renin activity (PRA) and plasma aldosterone (PA) were collected after subjects had remained in the supine position for at least 15 min. PRA and PA were measured by radioimmunoassay (Dainabot, Tokyo, Japan). PRA and PA were measured both before and 1 h after oral administration of 25 mg captopril.
RI of interlobar arteries Three different interlobar arteries from the right kidney were randomly selected and examined, and the mean value was calculated. The coefficient of variance for RI was 3.6%, as we reported previously (10,11). The same procedure was followed 1 h after subjects were given 25 mg captopril orally. To avoid possible side effects, subjects were kept in the supine position and blood pressure was monitored every 30 min until the end of the study.
To evaluate the changes in RI after the captopril test,
Statistical analysis
Clinical characteristics The clinical characteristics of diabetic patients and control subjects are shown in Table 1. Diabetic patients were grouped by level of UAE. Among the three groups, no significant differences were found in sex, age, BMI, cigarette-years, systolic or diastolic blood pressure, creatinine, total cholesterol, triglycerides, or HDL cholesterol. Fasting plasma glucose was significantly higher in diabetic patients than in control subjects. There were no significant differences in the duration of diabetes, fasting plasma glucose, or HbA1c between the two groups of diabetic patients.
Changes in blood pressure, heart rate, PRA, and PA after the captopril test The changes in blood pressure, heart rate, PRA, and PA from before to after the captopril test are shown in Table 2. Systolic and diastolic blood pressures after the captopril test were significantly lower than before the test in both the control subjects and the two groups of diabetic patients (P < 0.001). In the control subjects, PRA after the captopril test was significantly higher than before the test (P < 0.01). In diabetic patients, PRA in group 1 was significantly higher after the captopril test than before it (P < 0.01), and in group 2 PRA was higher with borderline significance (P = 0.06). PA after the captopril test was significantly lower than that before the test in all three groups (P < 0.01 in control subjects; P < 0.05 in diabetic patients).
Changes in RI after the captopril test No significant difference existed in baseline RI values among the three groups (Table 2), although RI values in diabetic patients tended to be higher than those in control subjects, as previously reported (10). In control subjects, the RI values after the test were significantly higher than those before the test (P < 0.01). RI values after the captopril test were significantly lower than those before the test in both groups with diabetes (P < 0.001), in contrast to the control subjects. There were no significant differences in RI values between the two groups of diabetic patients, either before or after the test (unpaired Students t test).
Changes in RI value (
Correlation between RI and clinical parameters in diabetic patientsLinear regression analyses were performed to examine the relationships between RI and clinical parameters. Between RI and HbA1c in diabetic patients, there was a negative correlation with a coefficient of r = -0.458 (P < 0.005, Fig. 2). Between RI and baseline PRA in patients, there was a negative correlation with a coefficient of r = -0.339 (P < 0.05). However, there was no significant correlation between RI value and other clinical parameters in diabetic patients, including age, duration of diabetes, BMI , cigarette-years, blood pressure, total cholesterol, triglycerides, HDL cholesterol, and baseline PA. There was no significant correlation between RI and changes in mean blood pressure, PRA, or PA in diabetic patients either.
Factors associated with RI in diabetic patientsResults of a multiple regression analysis examining possible predictors independently affecting RI in diabetic patients are shown in Table 3. HbA1c and baseline PRA value significantly and independently affected RI in diabetic patients (R2 = 0.391, P < 0.0001)
In the present study, we examined intrarenal hemodynamic changes after the captopril test using duplex Doppler sonography to investigate the response to ACE inhibitors in patients with type 2 diabetes. We found a significant decrease in RI after the captopril test in patients with type 2 diabetes, in contrast to control subjects, in whom RI values were significantly increased. Poor control of blood glucose, as represented by increased HbA1c, and basal PRA affected the magnitude of decrease in RI in patients with type 2 diabetes. Veglio et al. (15) reported that in healthy subjects and patients with mild hypertension, RI values of interlobar arteries after the captopril (50 mg) test were significantly higher than those before the captopril test. In the present study, RI values in the control subjects were significantly increased after the captopril test, being consistent with the results of Veglio et al., despite the difference between studies in the dose of captopril used. A dose of 25 mg captopril was chosen for the present study, because of differences in body size between Caucasians and Japanese. Although the precise mechanism of increase in RI value is unknown, the increase in RI values in the control subjects could be related to functional vasoconstriction in the kidney (autoregulation), which may be induced by significant decrease in systemic blood pressure induced by captopril (15). In contrast to the increase in RI values after the captopril test in control subjects, a significant decrease in RI after the captopril test was seen in diabetic patients. Our results suggest the disruption of autoregulation in the kidney against decrease in blood pressure is present in diabetic patients. Although disruption of renal autoregulation was also reported in patients with advanced hypertension (15), our patients were all normotensive, suggesting that other mechanisms of decrease in RI values are present in diabetic patients. Because the average salt consumption by Japanese adults was 12.213.2 g/day during the 1990s, differences in salt intake between control subjects and diabetic patients (10 g/day) probably did not account for differences in RAS activity between control subjects and diabetic patients. Examining 22 patients with renovascular hypertension, Veglio et al. (12) demonstrated that RI values after the captopril test were significantly decreased in kidneys with stenotic arteries but not in kidneys with nonstenotic arteries. This phenomenon is believed to be due to the dependency of the intrarenal vasculature on increased RAS activity in ischemic kidneys. In the present study, we found that one of the significant factors affecting the magnitude of decrease in RI value was baseline PRA. The higher the basal PRA was, the greater decrease in RI value after the captopril test was seen. These results suggest that diabetic kidneys may also depend on RAS activity, as seen in the ischemic kidneys of patients with renovascular hypertension. They also suggest that RAS activation may be present in the kidney of diabetic patients. In fact, both experimental and clinical studies have shown that hyperglycemia induces RAS activation, leading to increase in renal vascular resistance. Woods et al. (16) demonstrated that intrarenal infusion of glucose in anesthetized dogs increased renin secretion. Using hyperglycemic clamp, Miller et al. (17) showed that, in patients with type 1 diabetes, hyperglycemia increased PRA and renal vascular resistance. Furthermore, recently, the angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonist losartan was demonstrated to significantly increase renal plasma flow and significantly decrease renal vascular resistance in patients with type 1 diabetes, suggesting increased activity of the intrarenal RAS in diabetic patients (3). Price et al. (4) also found increased intrarenal RAS activity in type 2 diabetic patients with overt proteinuria, compared with healthy subjects, by demonstrating that a significant increase in renal plasma flow was induced by another angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonist irbesartan. Mizuiri et al. (18) demonstrated increased immunostaining of angiotensin converting enzyme in the diabetic glomeruli, suggesting increased RAS activity in diabetic kidney. These reports, together with the present study, suggest that intrarenal hemodynamics change and become dependent on RAS activity in the presence of increased intrarenal RAS activity in diabetic patients. It has been reported that activation of RAS by hyperglycemia increases the renal vascular resistance in both type 1 and type 2 diabetes (3,17). In the present study, patients with relatively higher HbA1c were included because they were treated for poor glycemic control, possibly leading to increased RAS activation. The decrease in RI values observed after the captopril test in the present study could be caused by elimination of intrarenal vasoconstriction after ACE inhibition. In the present study, the response to captopril (decrease in RI) was significantly affected by HbA1c level. This result further indicates that intrarenal RAS activity is increased as glycemic control becomes poorer, consistent with the findings of the previous study (3,17). In the present study, there were no significant differences in response to captopril between patients with normoalbuminuria (group 1) and those with microalbuminuria (group 2). The results of several studies, along with those of the present study, suggest that activation of the intrarenal RAS may be present in diabetic patients. The present study demonstrated that activation of intrarenal RAS could be caused by poor glycemic control and that blockade of RAS activation by ACE inhibition significantly reduced renal vascular resistance. By examining intrarenal hemodynamic changes, the present study has emphasized that relief from intrarenal RAS activation by strict control of blood glucose and/or use of RAS inhibition is important in improvement of renal hemodynamics and has provided evidence of a beneficial effect of ACE inhibition in diabetic patients.
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Eiji Ishimura, MD, Department of Nephrology, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-4-3, Asahi-machi, Abeno-ku, Osaka, 545-8585, Japan. E-mail: Ish{at}med.osaka-cu.ac.jp. Received for publication 5 April 2002 and accepted in revised form 14 September 2002. A table elsewhere in this issue shows conventional and Système International (SI) units and conversion factors for many substances.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||