HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Nicklas, B. J. Articles by Dennis, K. E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Nicklas, B. J. Articles by Dennis, K. E. Social Bookmarking                What's this?

Visceral Adipose Tissue Cutoffs Associated With Metabolic Risk Factors for Coronary Heart Disease in Women

¹ Section on Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
² Division of Gerontology, University of Maryland School of Medicine and the Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center (GRECC), Baltimore VA Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland
³ School of Nursing, University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida

	ABSTRACT

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS RESULTS CONCLUSIONS References

 
OBJECTIVE—This study determined whether there is a critical level of visceral adipose tissue (VAT) associated with elevated coronary heart disease (CHD) risk factors in a cohort of women >45 years of age.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—Measurements of body composition (dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry), body fat distribution (computed tomography), fasting and 2-h postprandial (75-g) glucose concentrations, and fasting lipoprotein lipid and insulin concentrations were performed in 233 perimenopausal (9%) and postmenopausal women (age 59 ± 6 years, 79% Caucasian, 16% on hormone replacement therapy).

RESULTS—Women in the lowest VAT quintile (105 cm²) had higher concentrations of HDL and HDL₂ cholesterol, lower LDL/HDL cholesterol ratios and triglyceride concentrations, and lower fasting glucose and insulin concentrations than women in the remaining four quintiles (P values <0.05–0.001). Women in the second lowest VAT quintile (106–139 cm²) had higher HDL and HDL₂ cholesterol and lower LDL/HDL ratios than women with a VAT 163 cm² (P < 0.05). Logistic regression analyses showed that women with a VAT of 106–162 cm² are 2.5 times more likely to have a low HDL cholesterol (P < 0.05), while women with a VAT 163 cm² are 5.5 times more likely to have a low HDL cholesterol (P < 0.01) and 4.0 times more likely to have a high LDL/HDL ratio (P < 0.05) compared with women with a VAT 105 cm². Women with a VAT 163 cm² are at a higher risk of having impaired glucose tolerance (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS—A VAT 106 cm² is associated with an elevated risk, and a VAT 163 cm² with an even greater risk, for these metabolic CHD risk factors compared with women with a VAT 105 cm². These values may prove useful for defining "visceral obesity" and for identifying women most likely to benefit from preventative interventions.

Abbreviations: CHD, coronary heart disease • CT, computed tomography • HRT, hormone replacement therapy • VAT, visceral adipose tissue • WHR, waist-to-hip ratio

	INTRODUCTION

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS RESULTS CONCLUSIONS References

 
Obesity is a significant health problem, with nearly one-half of U.S. women and men over 20 years of age considered to be overweight (1). The current criterion used for characterizing individuals as overweight (BMI 25–29.9 kg/m²) or obese (>30 kg/m²) were derived from epidemiological evidence showing that the presence of adiposity-related comorbidities increases abruptly beyond these cut points (2,3). However, obesity is a heterogeneous disorder in that the storage depot for excess calories differs widely between individuals, and these differences in fat distribution confer differential health risks. An excess of fat in the abdominal region is a better predictor of coronary heart disease (CHD) and type 2 diabetes, as well as their risk factors (dyslipidemia, glucose intolerance, and hyperinsulinemia), than the total amount of adipose tissue (4,5–7).

Most studies designed to assess the health risks of body fat distribution have used anthropometric measures such as waist circumference or waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) to estimate the amount of abdominal adipose tissue. Both of these measures are known independent predictors of metabolic risk factors for CHD in men and women, and it is likely that this association is due to an enlargement of visceral fat stores. In fact, the associations between risk factors and visceral adipose tissue (VAT), measured directly with computed tomography (CT) or magnetic imaging resonance, are stronger than the associations observed with WHR or waist circumference (8–12). In addition, visceral fat accumulation also contributes to CHD risk factors in healthy, nonobese individuals (10,13–15). Thus, the amount of VAT may be the best predictor of obesity-related metabolic complications and could be more clinically relevant than the quantity of total body fat for assessment of risk status.

There are well-known and physically obvious sex differences in the propensity to store fat in the abdominal region. On average, men have twice as much visceral fat as premenopausal women when matched for total body fat (16,17). However, the accumulation of visceral fat may be more detrimental to health in women than in men. This is evident from studies showing that the relative risk of death from cardiovascular disease is increased eight times in women with the highest WHR (7) but only two times in men with the highest WHR (18). These sex differences suggest that it may be important to assess the relationship of elevated health risk to VAT in women independently of men.

Although the association between VAT and risk and incidence of disease is well established, the specific amount of VAT that confers a health risk in women is not definitely known. To our knowledge, there are data from only three studies that attempted to define a "critical" cut point of VAT (19–21). For the most part, these studies were performed in young and middle-aged men and premenopausal women. Our hypothesis is that there is a critical level of VAT that defines postmenopausal women at heightened risk for CHD. Thus, the purpose of this study was to determine whether there is a critical level of VAT associated with elevated CHD risk factors in a cohort of older women. In addition, because of the cost and radiation exposure associated with direct measurement of VAT, we assessed whether the waist circumference of these women provided an accurate estimate of this VAT cut point.

	RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS RESULTS CONCLUSIONS References

 
The subjects for this study included peri- and postmenopausal women (at least 45 years of age) who were originally recruited for various weight loss and exercise training studies at the University of Maryland in Baltimore. Women were initially screened via telephone and excluded from participation if they were pregnant, were premenopausal (i.e., regular menstrual cycles), had smoked in the past 5 years, were regular exercisers (>15 min twice a week), had significant weight change (±5%) in the past year, or were taking antidepressants or medications affecting lipid or glucose metabolism. Perimenopausal women were those with irregular menstrual cycles not associated with pathology, such as polycystic ovarian disease, in the 6 months before the study. Postmenopausal women had no menses for at least 1 year before the study and follicle-stimulating hormone values >20 mIU/ml.

Written informed consent was obtained on the first clinic visit from each woman according to the guidelines of the University of Maryland Institutional Review Board for Human Research. Initial screening evaluations, including a medical history, physical examination, 12-lead resting electrocardiogram, fasting blood profile (complete blood count and Chem 18), and graded exercise stress test (22) were performed to exclude women with evidence of ischemia, hypertriglyceridemia (>400 mg/dl), untreated hypertension (blood pressure >160/90 mmHg), cancer, liver, renal, or hematological disease, or other medical disorders. A total of 233 women met these criteria, and their baseline data were used in the cross-sectional secondary analysis for this study.

Procedures
Measurements of body composition, body fat distribution, fasting and 2-h postprandial (75-g) glucose concentrations (23), and fasting lipoprotein lipid and insulin concentrations were conducted over the course of 2 days. A fasting blood sample was drawn on both days to provide a duplicate measurement of lipoprotein lipids, and the values reported are the average of these 2 days. If the total cholesterol and triglyceride values differed by >5%, or the HDL cholesterol values differed by >10%, a third sample was drawn, and the values reported are the average of these measurements.

Body composition.
Height and weight were measured and BMI calculated as weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in meters. WHR was calculated from the duplicate measurement of the minimal waist circumference to the circumference of the maximal gluteal protuberance. Waist (minimal circumference) and hip (maximal gluteal protuberance) circumferences were measured in duplicate. Percent body fat, fat-free (bone and muscle) mass, and adipose tissue mass were measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DPX-L; Lunar Radiation, Madison, WI). A single-slice CT scan taken midway between L4 and L5 was performed using a GE Hi-Light CT scanner to measure abdominal VAT and subcutaneous adipose tissue areas, as previously described (24).

Lipoprotein lipids and glucose and insulin values.
Venous blood samples for the measurement of lipoprotein lipids, glucose, and insulin were collected in chilled tubes containing 1 mg EDTA per milliliter of blood. Plasma was separated by centrifugation at 4°C, and lipoprotein lipids were measured as previously described (25). In our laboratory, the inter- and intra-assay coefficients of variation were 6.2 and 1.5%, respectively, for the measurement of total cholesterol, 7.6 and 2.6% for triglycerides, 9.2 and 2.7% for HDL cholesterol, and 7.6 and 2.8% for LDL cholesterol. Glucose was measured using the glucose oxidase method (Beckman Glucose Analyzer; Beckman, Fullerton, CA), and insulin was measured by radioimmunoassay with an insulin-specific antibody (cross-reactivity with proinsulin <0.2%) (Linco, St. Louis, MO). The lower limit of detection of this assay in our laboratory is 12 pmol/l. Intra- and interassay coefficients of variation of pooled control sera average 5 and 9%, respectively.

Statistics.
Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 10.1. Data were first tested for a normal distribution using the Shapiro-Wilk test for normality. Triglyceride and HDL₂ cholesterol concentrations were not normally distributed. Log transformation normalized the distribution of both variables so the logarithm of these data were used for parametric statistical analyses. Partial correlation coefficients adjusted for age and race were computed to identify statistically significant correlations between VAT and disease risk factors. The level of VAT associated with elevated CHD risk factors was determined in two ways. First, women were divided into quintiles based on their level of VAT (n = 46–47 per group) and risk factors were compared between these groups using ANCOVA with calculation of simple contrasts and controlling for age and race. Next, logistic regression analyses, adjusted for age and race, was used to calculate the relative risks for having a low HDL cholesterol (<1.0 mmol/l or 40 mg/dl) (26), hypertriglyceridemia (1.7 mmol/l or 150 mg/dl) (26), high LDL/HDL cholesterol ratio (3.0), and impaired glucose tolerance (2-h glucose >7.8 mmol/l or 140 mg/dl [23]). The level of significance was set at P < 0.05, and all data are reported as mean ± SD.

	RESULTS

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS RESULTS CONCLUSIONS References

 
Descriptive statistics
The women in this study ranged in age from 45 to 73 years (59 ± 6 years). Of the 233 subjects, 22 were perimenopausal (9%) and 211 postmenopausal (91%) and 50 were African American (21%) and 183 Caucasian (79%). Although no women were on lipid-lowering medications, some did use hormone replacement therapy (HRT), nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and antihypertensive medications (Table 1). A total of eight women were diagnosed with diabetes based on a 2-h postprandial glucose >200 mg/dl. As shown in Table 1, although the majority of women were overweight/obese, there was a wide range in body weight, body fatness, abdominal fat distribution, and metabolic risk factors among both African-American and Caucasian women.

Associations between metabolic CHD risk factors and VAT
Partial correlation coefficients were calculated to determine whether there was a linear relationship between metabolic CHD risk factors and VAT. This analysis was adjusted for age and race, but not for total fat mass, since we were interested in assessing the association between risk factors and the absolute amount of VAT. Concentrations of total and LDL cholesterol and systolic and diastolic blood pressure did not correlate with VAT in these women; however, all other risk factors were related to VAT (Table 2).

Figure 1 shows the average lipoprotein lipid concentrations by quintile of VAT. Women in the lowest VAT quintile (105 cm²) had significantly higher concentrations of HDL and HDL₂ cholesterol and lower LDL/HDL cholesterol ratios and triglyceride concentrations than women in the remaining four quintiles (P values <0.05–0.001). Women in the second lowest VAT quintile (106–139 cm²) had higher HDL and HDL₂ cholesterol concentrations and lower LDL/HDL cholesterol ratios than women with a VAT 163 cm² (P < 0.05), as well as had lower triglyceride concentrations than women with a VAT 193 cm² (P < 0.05).

View larger version (57K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 1— Associations between lipoprotein lipid concentrations and VAT. VAT groups were derived from the quintile distribution of this sample. Numbers signify P < 0.05 from quintiles 1 and 2, respectively. Analyses adjusted for age and race.

View larger version (36K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 2— Associations between fasting glucose, 2-h glucose, and insulin concentrations and VAT. VAT groups were derived from the quintile distribution of this sample. Numbers signify P < 0.05 from quintiles 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Analyses adjusted for age and race.

View larger version (21K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 3— Relationship between waist circumference and VAT (r = 0.60, P < 0.0001) [waist circumference = 0.119 (VAT) + 76.75].

	CONCLUSIONS

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS RESULTS CONCLUSIONS References

 
The results of this study show that in middle-aged and older women, a VAT area 106 cm² is associated with elevated risk for having low HDL cholesterol concentrations, hypertriglyceridemia, high LDL/HDL cholesterol ratio, impaired glucose tolerance, and hyperinsulinemia compared with those with a VAT 105 cm². A VAT 163 cm² is predictive of an even greater risk for these metabolic risk factors for CHD, relative to lower VAT levels. These analyses were adjusted for age and race because of the effects of these factors on the selective accumulation of visceral fat. Although visceral fat mass is, in part, affected by total body fat mass, we chose not to adjust our analyses for total fat mass since we were more interested in determining an absolute level of VAT associated with CHD risk factors. This decision was based on evidence showing that there are large interindividual differences in the amount of visceral fat at any level of body fat content (27,28).

This critical VAT cutoff of 106 cm² is similar to the value of 110 cm², which was shown by Williams et al. (21) to be associated with elevated risk factors for CHD, including high total cholesterol and triglycerides, low HDL cholesterol, and elevated blood pressure in women. In addition, this value matches that of the critical value of 100 cm² shown by Despres and Lamarche (19) to be associated with metabolic risk factors for type 2 diabetes and CHD in younger women. These results are comparable despite the fact that we studied an overall older and more obese sample of women. Moreover, it is important to point out that in the few studies to date that have attempted to identify cut points for VAT, some have used receiver-operating characteristic curve analyses, while others used a similar approach (logistical regression analyses) to ours. We chose the latter approach because, from a clinical standpoint, the degree of relative risk may be more meaningful than a likelihood ratio of sensitivity or specificity. The fact that the 100- to 110-cm² value is consistent across studies suggests that the different analyses produce similar results. Thus, our data confirm the finding that a VAT of 100–110 cm² is predictive of adverse lipid (HDL cholesterol and triglyceride) and glucose risk factors in women. However, unlike these other studies (19,21), total and LDL cholesterol were not related to VAT in the sample of women we studied. Instead, age was the only independent predictor of total and LDL cholesterol in our women (data not shown). This finding may be due to the older age or much higher degree of total obesity in our sample, as evidenced by their average age (59 years) and percentage body fat (46%).

The association between an abdominal fat distribution and a greater incidence of metabolic health problems was reported as early as the 1950s (29). Subsequently, it was discovered that the associations observed between anthropometric measures of abdominal fat and higher risk for CHD likely resulted from the excess accumulation of VAT (8–11,12). Furthermore, while the amount of visceral fat correlates with the amount of total body fat, visceral obesity and its associated metabolic complications are not only evident in obese subjects. Studies show that visceral fat accumulation also contributes to metabolic risk factors in healthy, nonobese individuals (10,13–15). In addition, obese individuals who are "metabolically healthy" have very little visceral fat accumulation (30). Thus, the majority of evidence to date suggests that assessment of visceral fat may be more clinically relevant than assessment of total body fat for the prediction of subsequent CHD onset.

Despite the clinically significant information gained from assessment of VAT, its measurement is costly, it involves radiation exposure, and it is not a practical screening tool for the general population. Therefore, anthropometric or other surrogate measures of VAT need to be defined. For example, waist circumference, which has been shown to be the best predictor of VAT in several studies (31–34), has been proposed as a screening tool for assessment of disease risk (3). In the present study, there was only a modest correlation between waist circumference and VAT, as well as a large degree of variation in waist circumferences for a given VAT level. In addition, the waist circumference cut points that corresponded to the high-risk and very high-risk VAT cut points in these women were predictive of an increased risk for low HDL cholesterol and glucose intolerance, although the relative risks were not as high as those for the VAT cut points.

Recently, Despres and colleagues (4,35) have proposed a novel screening approach for identifying viscerally obese men at risk for CHD that utilizes waist circumference and fasting triglyceride concentrations. As noted by this group, the cut points they propose as useful in young and middle-aged men (waist circumference >90 cm and triglyceride concentration >2 mmol/l) may not be useful in individuals of a different sex, age, or race. For example, this group reports a much higher correlation between waist circumference and VAT (up to 0.87) in their study populations of young Caucasian men and women (32). In addition, they have shown that this relationship is age specific in that values of waist circumference that corresponded to "critical" levels of VAT were lower in subjects >40 than in those <40 years of age (33). Because of the preferential accumulation of VAT with age (16,36), a specific waist circumference may not correspond to a similar VAT level in younger and older individuals. This relationship may be even more complex in postmenopausal women, who are also predisposed to selective fat storage in the visceral region (37). Thus, further research is needed to define visceral obesity and identify simple markers of VAT that accurately predict risk factors and incidence of CHD in older women.

Some discussion is necessary regarding the limitations of this study. First, the women in this study were not randomly selected but were recruited for ongoing weight loss and exercise studies at the University of Maryland. In addition, we did not include women with frank CHD and/or diabetes and our sample was relatively healthy with respect to the risk factors studied. This could potentially limit the generalizability of our findings and/or may change the VAT cut points found by our analyses. Moreover, our sample included Caucasian and a small number of African-American women. Although there were no significant interactions between race and VAT for the risk factors tested, larger sample sizes are needed to definitely test whether there are ethnic differences in the degree of metabolic abnormalities for a given VAT level. In addition, adipose tissue or body weight cut points are a guide that can be used for defining associations with risk or incidence of disease. Like the BMI cut points, a critical level of VAT does not establish causality for an elevated disease risk. However, these values can be used as a guide for defining "visceral obesity" and may prove useful for identifying women most likely to benefit from preventative interventions. Further research is needed to confirm and/or refine these cut points for assessment of incidence of CHD (and to determine whether they differ by sex, ethnicity, or age-group), as well as to determine the percent of individuals in the population with this amount of VAT, i.e., prevalence of visceral obesity.

	Acknowledgments

 
This study was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants RO1 NR03514, R29 AG14066–02, K01 AG00747, K01 AG00685, and T32 AG-00219 and by the Department of Veterans Affairs Baltimore GRECC.

We are grateful to the nursing and laboratory staff of the University of Maryland’s Division of Gerontology and GRECC for their assistance in the conduct of this research. We especially thank all of the women who volunteered to participate.

	Footnotes

 
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Barbara J. Nicklas, PhD, Section on Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, Wake Forest University Medical Center, J. Paul Sticht Center on Aging, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC 27157. E-mail: bnicklas{at}wfubmc.edu.

Received for publication 25 July 2002 and accepted in revised form 14 February 2003.

A table elsewhere in this issue shows conventional and Système International (SI) units and conversion factors for many substances.

	References

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS RESULTS CONCLUSIONS References

 

1. Kuczmarksi R, Carroll M, Flegal K, Troiano R: Varying body mass index cutoff points to describe overweight prevalence among U.S. adults: NHANES III (1988–1994). Obes Res 5:542–548, 1997[Medline]
   
2. World Health Organization: Obesity: Preventing and Managing the Global Epidemic: Report of a WHO Consultation on Obesity. Geneva, World Health Org., 1998
   
3. National Institutes of Health: Clinical guidelines on the identification, evaluation, and treatment of overweight and obesity in adults: the evidence report. Obes Res (6 Suppl. 2):51S–209S, 1998
   
4. Despres JP, Lemieux I, Prud’homme D: Treatment of obesity: need to focus on high risk abdominally obese patients. BMJ 322:716–720, 2001[Free Full Text]
   
5. Fujimoto WY, Bergstrom RW, Boyko EJ, Chen KW, Leonetti DL, Newell-Morris L, Shofer JB, Wahl PW: Visceral adiposity and incident coronary heart disease in Japanese-American men: the 10-year follow-up results of the Seattle Japanese-American Community Diabetes Study. Diabetes Care 22:1808–1812, 1999[Abstract/Free Full Text]
   
6. Rexrode K, Carey V, Hennekens C, Walters E, Colditz G, Stampfer M, Willett W, Manson J: Abdominal adiposity and coronary heart disease in women. JAMA 280:1843–1848, 1998[Abstract/Free Full Text]
   
7. Lapidus L, Bengtsson C, Larsson B, Pennert K, Rybo E, Sjostrom L: Distribution of adipose tissue and risk of cardiovascular disease and death: a 12 year follow up of participants in the population study of women in Gothenburg, Sweden. BMJ 289:1257–1260, 1984
   
8. Lemieux S: Contribution of visceral obesity to the insulin resistance syndrome. Can J Appl Physiol 26:273–290, 2001[Medline]
   
9. Brochu M, Starling RD, Tchernof A, Matthews DE, Garcia-Rubi E, Poehlman ET: Visceral adipose tissue is an independent correlate of glucose disposal in older obese postmenopausal women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85:2378–2384, 2000[Abstract/Free Full Text]
   
10. Carey D, Jenkins A, Campbell L, Freund J, Chisholm D: Abdominal fat and insulin resistance in normal and overweight women–direct measurements reveal a strong relationship in subjects at both low and high risk of NIDDM. Diabetes 45:633–638, 1996[Abstract]
    
11. Ross R, Fortier L, Hudson R: Separate associations between visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue distribution, insulin and glucose levels in obese women. Diabetes Care 19:1404–1411, 1996[Abstract]
    
12. Despres J, Nadeau A, Tremblay A, Ferland M, Moorjani S, Lupien P, Theriault G, Pinault S, Bouchard C: Role of deep abdominal fat in the association between regional adipose tissue distribution and glucose tolerance in obese women. Diabetes 38:304–309, 1989[Abstract]
    
13. DeNino WF, Tchernof A, Dionne IJ, Toth MJ, Ades PA, Sites CK, Poehlman ET: Contribution of abdominal adiposity to age-related differences in insulin sensitivity and plasma lipids in healthy nonobese women. Diabetes Care 24:925–932, 2001[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
14. DiPietro L, Katz L, Nadel E: Excess abdominal adiposity remains correlated with altered lipid concentrations in healthy older women. Int J Obes 23:432–436, 1999
    
15. Park KS, Rhee BD, Lee KU, Kim SY, Lee HK, Koh CS, Min HK: Intra-abdominal fat is associated with decreased insulin sensitivity in healthy young men. Metabolism 40:600–603, 1991[Medline]
    
16. Enzi G, Gasparo M, Biondetti P, Fiore D, Semisa M, Zurlo F: Subcutaneous and visceral fat distribution according to sex, age and overweight, evaluated by computed tomography. Am J Clin Nutr 44:739–746, 1986[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
17. Lemieux S, Prud’homme D, Bouchard C, Tremblay A, Despres J: Sex differences in the relation of visceral adipose tissue accumulation to total body fatness. Am J Clin Nutr 58:463–467, 1993[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
18. Larsson B, Svardsudd K, Welin L, Wilhelmsen L, Bjorntorp P, Tibblin G: Abdominal adipose tissue distribution, obesity, and risk of cardiovascular disease and death: 13 year follow up of participants in the study of men born in 1913. BMJ288:1401–1404, 1984
    
19. Despres J, Lamarche B: Effects of diet and physical activity on adiposity and body fat distribution: implications for the prevention of cardiovascular disease. Nutr Res Rev 6:137–159, 1993
    
20. Hunter GR, Snyder SW, Kekes-Szabo T, Nicholson C, Berland L: Intra-abdominal adipose tissue values associated with risk of possessing elevated blood lipids and blood pressure. Obes Res 2:563–568, 1994[Medline]
    
21. Williams MJ, Hunter GR, Kekes-Szabo T, Trueth MS, Snyder S, Berland L, Blaudeau T: Intra-abdominal adipose tissue cut-points related to elevated cardiovascular risk in women. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 20:613–617, 1996[Medline]
    
22. Bruce RA, Horstein TR: Exercise stress testing in evaluation of patients with ischemic heart disease. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 11:371–390, 1969[Medline]
    
23. Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus: Report of the Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus. Diabetes Care 25:S5–S20, 2002
    
24. Nicklas B, Rogus E, Colman E, Goldberg A: Visceral adiposity, increased adipocyte lipolysis and metabolic dysfunction in obese, postmenopausal women. Am J Physiol 270:E72–E78, 1996
    
25. Nicklas BJ, Katzel LI, Bunyard LB, Dennis KE, Goldberg AP: Effects of an American Heart Association diet and weight loss on lipoprotein lipids in obese, postmenopausal women. Am J Clin Nutr 66:853–859, 1997[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
26. Executive Summary of The Third Report of The National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, And Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol In Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). JAMA 285:2486–2497, 2001[Free Full Text]
    
27. Bouchard C, Despres JP, Mauriege P: Genetic and nongenetic determinants of regional fat distribution. Endocr Rev 14:72–93, 1993[Abstract]
    
28. Kamel E, McNeill G, Han T, Smith F, Avenell A, Davidson L, Tothill P: Measurement of abdominal fat by magnetic resonance imaging, dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry and anthropometry in non-obese men and women. Int J Obes 23:686–692, 1999
    
29. Vague J: The degree of masculine differentiation of obesities: a factor determining predisposition to diabetes, atherosclerosis, gout and uric-calculous disease. Am J Clin Nutr 4:20–34, 1956[Abstract]
    
30. Brochu M, Tchernof A, Dionne IJ, Sites CK, Eltabbakh GH, Sims EA, Poehlman ET: What are the physical characteristics associated with a normal metabolic profile despite a high level of obesity in postmenopausal women? J Clin Endocrinol Metab 86:1020–1025, 2001[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
31. Koester RS, Hunter GR, Snyder S, Khaled MA, Berland LL: Estimation of computerized tomography derived abdominal fat distribution. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 16:543–554, 1992[Medline]
    
32. Pouliot MC, Despres JP, Lemieux S, Moorjani S, Bouchard C, Tremblay A, Nadeau A, Lupien PJ: Waist circumference and abdominal sagittal diameter: best simple anthropometric indexes of abdominal visceral adipose tissue accumulation and related cardiovascular risk in men and women. Am J Cardiol 73:460–468, 1994[Medline]
    
33. Lemieux S, Prud’homme D, Bouchard C, Tremblay A, Despres JP: A single threshold value of waist girth identifies normal-weight and overweight subjects with excess visceral adipose tissue. Am J Clin Nutr 64:685–693, 1996[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
34. Despres JP, Prud’homme D, Pouliot MC, Tremblay A, Bouchard C: Estimation of deep abdominal adipose-tissue accumulation from simple anthropometric measurements in men. Am J Clin Nutr 54:471–477, 1991[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
35. Lemieux I, Pascot A, Couillard C, Lamarche B, Tchernof A, Almeras N, Bergeron J, Gaudet D, Tremblay G, Prud’homme D, Nadeau A, Despres JP: Hypertriglyceridemic waist: a marker of the atherogenic metabolic triad (hyperinsulinemia; hyperapolipoprotein B; small, dense LDL) in men? Circulation 102:179–184, 2000[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
36. Seidell J, Oosterlee A, Deurenberg P, Hautvast J, Ruijs J: Abdominal fat depots measured with computed tomography: effects of degree of obesity, sex, and age. Eur J Clin Nutr 42:805–815, 1988[Medline]
    
37. Toth MJ, Tchernof A, Sites CK, Poehlman ET: Menopause-related changes in body fat distribution. Ann N Y Acad Sci 904:502–506, 2000[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    

CiteULike

Del.icio.us

Digg

Reddit

Technorati

This article has been cited by other articles:

				G. A. Rosito, J. M. Massaro, U. Hoffmann, F. L. Ruberg, A. A. Mahabadi, R. S. Vasan, C. J. O'Donnell, and C. S. Fox Pericardial Fat, Visceral Abdominal Fat, Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors, and Vascular Calcification in a Community-Based Sample: The Framingham Heart Study Circulation, February 5, 2008; 117(5): 605 - 613. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. S. Fox, J. M. Massaro, U. Hoffmann, K. M. Pou, P. Maurovich-Horvat, C.-Y. Liu, R. S. Vasan, J. M. Murabito, J. B. Meigs, L. A. Cupples, et al. Abdominal Visceral and Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue Compartments: Association With Metabolic Risk Factors in the Framingham Heart Study Circulation, July 3, 2007; 116(1): 39 - 48. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Nisoli, E. Clementi, M. O. Carruba, and S. Moncada Defective Mitochondrial Biogenesis: A Hallmark of the High Cardiovascular Risk in the Metabolic Syndrome? Circ. Res., March 30, 2007; 100(6): 795 - 806. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Hayashi, E. J. Boyko, M. J. McNeely, D. L. Leonetti, S. E. Kahn, and W. Y. Fujimoto Minimum Waist and Visceral Fat Values for Identifying Japanese Americans at Risk for the Metabolic Syndrome Diabetes Care, January 1, 2007; 30(1): 120 - 127. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. M. Utzschneider and S. E. Kahn The Role of Insulin Resistance in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., December 1, 2006; 91(12): 4753 - 4761. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Lee, F. Bacha, N. Gungor, and S. A. Arslanian Racial Differences in Adiponectin in Youth: Relationship to visceral fat and insulin sensitivityv Diabetes Care, January 1, 2006; 29(1): 51 - 56. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. F. Binder, K. E. Yarasheski, K. Steger-May, D. R. Sinacore, M. Brown, K. B. Schechtman, and J. O. Holloszy Effects of Progressive Resistance Training on Body Composition in Frail Older Adults: Results of a Randomized, Controlled Trial J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., November 1, 2005; 60(11): 1425 - 1431. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. B. Carr, K. M. Utzschneider, R. L. Hull, K. Kodama, B. M. Retzlaff, J. D. Brunzell, J. B. Shofer, B. E. Fish, R. H. Knopp, and S. E. Kahn Intra-Abdominal Fat Is a Major Determinant of the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III Criteria for the Metabolic Syndrome Diabetes, August 1, 2004; 53(8): 2087 - 2094. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Nicklas, B. J. Articles by Dennis, K. E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Nicklas, B. J. Articles by Dennis, K. E. Social Bookmarking                What's this?