Diabetes Care
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Boulton, A. J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Armstrong, D. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Boulton, A. J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Armstrong, D. G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Diabetes Care 26:2689-2690, 2003
© 2003 by the American Diabetes Association, Inc.


Editorials
Editorial

Trials in Neuropathic Diabetic Foot Ulceration

Time for a paradigm shift?

Andrew J. M. Boulton, MD, FRCP1,2 and David G. Armstrong, DPM2,3

1 Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Diabetes, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, Florida
2 Department of Medicine, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, U.K
3 Department of Surgery, Southern Arizona Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Tucson, Arizona

Address correspondence to Andrew J.M. Boulton, MD, FRCP, Division of Endocrinology, University of Miami School of Medicine, PO Box 016960 (D-110), Miami, FL 33101. E-mail: aboulton{at}med.miami.edu

Diabetic foot ulceration is a serious and expensive complication with considerable morbidity that affects up to 15% of diabetic patients during their lifetime; moreover, ~80% of amputations are preceded by foot ulcers (1). Despite these facts, Mason et al. (2) concluded in their systematic review of treatments for foot lesions that the evidence base for treatments is poor. Furthermore, they criticized the majority of published trials of potentially promising treatments for neuropathic ulcers as being small, inadequately powered, and failing to use standardized methods and outcomes.

It is therefore refreshing to read the work of Kalani et al. (3) in this issue of Diabetes Care. In a well-designed controlled trial, patients with neuroischemic ulcers were randomized to receive daily subcutaneous low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH) or placebo. Those randomized to LMWH had significantly better outcomes with respect to healing rates and amputation. There are also potentially exciting new treatments for ischemic limbs in diabetes (4,5). Therapeutic angiogenesis with vascular endothelial growth factor and other factors appears promising in chronic limb ischemia, and larger trials are now in progress.

Unfortunately, evidence of the efficacy of new dressings and other potentially promising local treatments for neuropathic foot ulcers is not so forthcoming. It is well recognized that neuropathy is the most important contributing cause of diabetic foot ulceration (6), which frequently combines with deformity and trauma to result in ulceration. It is generally accepted (7) that a neuropathic ulcer will heal if three factors are attended to: 1) the circulation is intact, 2) infection is treated appropriately, and 3) repetitive pressure is mitigated in the region of the ulcer. Arterial inflow is, by definition, not a common problem in neuropathic ulcers, and treatment of present infection, using appropriate antibiotics, can be achieved in most cases. Most trials have failed to appreciate the importance of the last of these principles, forgetting that neuropathic patients lack pain sensation and, despite all good intentions, tend to walk on plantar ulcers. Therefore it is hardly surprising that new trials of therapeutic agents have been disappointing if patients fail to wear the provided removable off-loading orthoses or cast walkers.

Is there evidence to support this failure to wear prescribed off-loading devices? The answer is clearly yes, and several published studies demonstrate this. First, when supplied free of charge with specialist footwear, Knowles et al. (8) reported that only 20% of patients actually wore the shoes. Second, Armstrong et al. (9) recently assessed activity patterns of neuropathic diabetic foot ulcerations managed with an off-loading removable cast walker (RCW). By recording activity using a computerized pedometer and comparing this with activity recorded from a similar device implanted in the RCW, it was shown that the RCW was only worn during 28% of daily activity (9). Third, in a randomized controlled trial (10) of different off-loading devices, we clearly demonstrated the superiority of the total-contact cast (TCC) over a half-shoe or RCW in the management of neuropathic plantar foot ulcers. As a previous study (11) had confirmed that the TCC and RCW reduced pressure to a similar extent, it can be concluded that in the randomized off-loading trial (10), those patients randomized to the RCW did not wear the walker for all of their walking time.

Finally, a recent trial of a promising new dressing surprisingly failed to demonstrate efficacy. Veves et al. (12), in an adequately designed and powered study, compared Promogran with standardized moistened-gauze therapy, but were unable to show a difference in healing rates. A likely explanation for this outcome could be the failure to standardize off-loading, which was "left to individual centers."

In consideration of the above, we propose a paradigm shift in the design of clinical trials for new treatments for plantar neuropathic ulcers. To permit any new therapy to demonstrate efficacy, should future trials not employ a nonremovable off-loading device? This regulation has not been applied because of concern over the use of TCCs, which require considerable expertise and time to use and can themselves injure the insensate foot. We recently described (13) an alternative to the TCC, the instant TCC, using an RCW made nonremovable by wrapping it with cohesive bandage and/or plaster. This has several potential advantages over the traditional TCC. First, it enforces compliance but is lighter in weight. Second, it is quicker and easier to apply than the TCC, removing the need for a highly trained casting technician to be available at every clinic. Finally, it can reduce costs, because the same RCW can be used throughout the treatment. There are a number of randomized trials in progress that are using the nonremovable RCW; when its efficacy is proven to be similar to the traditional TCC, surely all future trials of therapy should use a nonremovable off-loading device.

References

  1. Mayfield JA, Reiber GE, Sanders LJ, Janise D, Pogach LM: Preventive foot care in people with diabetes. Diabetes Care 21:2161–2177, 1998[Abstract]
  2. Mason J, O’Keeffe C, Hutchinson A, McIntosh A, Young RJ, Booth A: A systematic review of foot ulcers in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. II: treatment. Diabet Med 16:889–909, 1999[Medline]
  3. Kalani M, Apelqvist J, Blombäck M, Brismar K, Eliasson B, Eriksson JW, Fagrell B, Hamsten A, Torffvit O, Jörneskog G: Effect of dalteparin on healing chronic foot ulcers in diabetic patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Diabetes Care 26:2575–2580, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Manninen HI, Makinen K: Gene therapy techniques for peripheral arterial disease. Carciovasc Intervent Radiol 25:98–108, 2002
  5. Kusumanto YH, Hospers GA, Mulder NH, Tio RA: Therapeutic angiogenesis with vascular endothelia growth factor in peripheral and coronary artery disease: a review. Int J Cardiovasc Intervent 5:27–34, 2003[Medline]
  6. Reiber GE, Vileikyte L, Boyko EJ, del Aguila M, Smith DG, Lavery LA, Boulton AJM: Causal pathways for incident lower-extremity ulcers in patients with diabetes from two settings. Diabetes Care 22:157–162, 1999[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Jude EB, Boulton AJM: End-stage complications of diabetic neuropathy. Diab Rev 7:395–410, 1999
  8. Knowles EA, Boulton AJM: Do people with diabetes wear their prescribed footwear? Diabet Med 13:1064–1068, 1996[Medline]
  9. Armstrong DG, Lavery LA, Kimbriel HR, Nixon BP, Boulton AJM: Activity patterns of patients with diabetic foot ulceration: patients with active ulceration may not adhere to a standard pressure off-loading regimen. Diabetes Care 26:2595–2597, 2003[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Armstrong DG, Nguyen HC, Lavery LA, van Schie CHM, Boulton AJM, Harkless LB: Off-loading the diabetic foot wound: a randomized clinical trial. Diabetes Care 24:1019–1022, 2001[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Lavery LA, Vela SA, Lavery DC, Quebedeaux TL: Reducing dynamic foot pressures in high-risk diabetic subjects with foot ulceration: a comparison of treatments. Diabetes Care 19:818–821, 1996[Abstract]
  12. Veves A, Sheehan P, Pham HT: A randomized controlled trial of promogran vs standard treatment in the management in the management of diabetic foot ulcers. Arch Surg 137:822–827, 2002[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Armstrong DG, Short B, Espensen EH, Abu-Rumman PL, Nixon BP, Boulton AJM: Technique for fabrication of an instant total-contact cast for treatment of neuropathic diabetic foot ulcers. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 92:405–408, 2002[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Am. Podiatr. Med. Assoc.Home page
D. G. Armstrong, K. Kunze, B. R. Martin, H. R. Kimbriel, B. P. Nixon, and A. J. M. Boulton
Plantar Pressure Changes Using a Novel Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Technique
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc, September 1, 2004; 94(5): 456 - 460.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
INT J LOW EXTREM WOUNDSHome page
D. G. Armstrong and L. A. Lavery
Decreasing Foot Pressures While Implementing Topical Negative Pressure (Vacuum-Assisted Closure) Therapy
International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds, March 1, 2004; 3(1): 12 - 15.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
W. J. Jeffcoate, F. L. Game, and P. E. Price
Off-Loading in Trials in Neuropathic Diabetic Foot Ulceration: No, it's not time for a paradigm shift
Diabetes Care, February 1, 2004; 27(2): 635 - 636.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
A. J.M. Boulton and D. G. Armstrong
Off-Loading in Trials of Neuropathic Diabetic Foot Ulceration: Further evidence of the need for a paradigm shift
Diabetes Care, February 1, 2004; 27(2): 636 - 637.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Boulton, A. J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Armstrong, D. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Boulton, A. J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Armstrong, D. G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Diabetes Diabetes Care Clinical Diabetes Diabetes Spectrum