© 2004 by the American Diabetes Association, Inc.
Physical Activity/Exercise and Type 2 Diabetes
1 Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada Address correspondence and reprint requests to Ronald J. Sigal, Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Health Research Institute, 1053 Carling Ave., Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1Y 4E9. E-mail: rsigal{at}ohri.ca
Abbreviations: ACSM, American College of Sports Medicine ADA, American Diabetes Association CAD, coronary artery disease CVD, cardiovascular disease DPP, Diabetes Prevention Program ECG, electrocardiogram EGP, endogenous glucose production IGT, impaired glucose tolerance IRS, insulin receptor substrate MAP, mitogen-activated protein MET, metabolic equivalent NEFA, nonesterified fatty acid PI, phosphatidylinositol I RM, repetition maximum
For decades, exercise has been considered a cornerstone of diabetes management, along with diet and medication. However, high-quality evidence on the importance of exercise and fitness in diabetes was lacking until recent years. The last American Diabetes Association (ADA) technical review of exercise and type 2 diabetes (formerly known as noninsulin dependent diabetes) was published in 1990. The present work emphasizes the advances that have occurred since the last technical review was published. Major developments since the 1990 technical review include:
Based on this new evidence, we have refined the recommendations on the desired types, amounts, and intensities of aerobic physical activity for people with diabetes. Resistance training will now be recommended in a broader group of patients and at a broader range of intensity than done previously. There are other areas in which new evidence is lacking, but we feel that previous recommendations may have been more conservative than necessary. These areas include indications for exercise stress test before beginning an exercise program and precautions regarding exercise in the presence of some specific complications or suboptimal metabolic control. The levels of evidence used are defined by the ADA (see Ref. 1). A new Handbook of Exercise was published in 2002 by the ADA, including 40 articles by leading experts on specific topics related to exercise and diabetes. Space limitations do not allow the present work to be comprehensive and, where appropriate, we refer the reader to chapters in the Handbook of Exercise and other review articles for additional details. The present review focuses on type 2 diabetes. Issues primarily germane to type 1 diabetes will be covered in a subsequent technical review.
The following definitions are based on those outlined in "Physical Activity and Health," the 1996 report of the Surgeon General (2).
Physical activity.
Exercise.
Physical fitness.
Cardiorespiratory fitness (also known as cardiorespiratory endurance or aerobic fitness).
Aerobic exercise.
Intensity of aerobic exercise.
Muscular fitness.
Resistance exercise.
Intensity of resistance exercise.
Flexibility.
Flexibility exercise.
MET (metabolic equivalent).
For more detailed reviews of the physiology and basic science of exercise, see Refs. 46. Exercise results in a shift in fuel usage by the working muscle from primarily nonesterified fatty acids (NEFAs) to a blend of NEFAs, glucose, and muscle glycogen. Muscle glycogen is the chief source of energy during the early stages of strenuous exercise, while with increasing exercise duration the contribution of circulating glucose and particularly NEFAs become more important as muscle glycogen gradually depletes. The origin of circulating glucose also shifts from hepatic glycogenolysis to gluconeogenesis. With increasing exercise intensity the balance of substrate usage shifts to greater carbohydrate oxidation. Although the metabolic response to exercise is influenced by numerous factors (e.g., nutrition, age, type of exercise, and physical condition), the most important factors affecting fuel utilization are generally work intensity and duration.
Regulation of fuel mobilization during aerobic exercise
Endogenous glucose production.
In contrast, in very intense aerobic exercise (>80% of O2max), the catecholamines likely play a more important role. In this situation, norepinephrine and epinephrine levels rise as much as 15-fold from baseline, and glucose production in young fit subjects rises about 7-fold during exercise (1012). In intense exercise under islet cell clamp, where the glucagon-to-insulin ratio does not rise, glucose production increases as much as it does without islet cell clamp (12). Infusion of norepinephrine (13), epinephrine (14), or both (15) during moderate exercise induces glucose production similar to that characteristic of intense exercise. Studies of intense exercise during ß-adrenergic blockade with propranolol in normal (11) and type 1 diabetic (16) subjects found that glucose production during exercise was greater than that in subjects exercising without ß-blockade. Conversely, another study (17) found that subjects performing intense exercise during -adrenergic blockade with phentolamine had slightly less glucose production than subjects exercising at similar intensity without adrenergic blockade. No study has used combined ß- and -adrenergic blockade during very intense exercise. These studies are difficult to interpret due to the lack of specificity of these pharmacological blockers. A method was developed in the dog that uses intraportal propranolol and phentolamine infusion to selectively block hepatic adrenergic receptors (18). Results obtained in this model were consistent with those using systemic adrenergic blockade, showing that EGP was not reliant on hepatic adrenergic receptor stimulation during heavy exercise (18). In normal subjects, plasma insulin doubles soon after the end of a very intense exercise session, restoring glycemia to baseline within an hour (10). In contrast, in type 1 diabetes, in which endogenous insulin cannot increase, hyperglycemia after very intense exercise lasts at least several hours (19,20).
Type 2 diabetic patients with a mild to moderate elevation in glucose levels may experience a fall in glucose during exercise due to impaired endogenous glucose output. This population, when maintained on diet therapy alone or diet and sulfonylurea therapy with postabsorptive plasma glucose in excess of 200 mg/dl and normal basal insulin, shows a fall in glycemia of
Fat metabolism.
Muscle glycogenolysis.
Exercise-induced muscle glucose uptake
Glucose delivery from blood to muscle. Muscle interstitial glucose would fall precipitously and the glucose transport gradient would be insufficient to sustain glucose uptake if it were not for the marked increase in blood flow to working muscle. The exercise-induced increase in glucose delivery is so effective at maintaining interstitial glucose that an increase in muscle fractional glucose extraction is not required for the increase in muscle glucose uptake (31). The importance of glucose supply is supported by the close correlation of muscle blood flow to glucose uptake by the working limb (32). In addition, an increase in perfusion of the isolated rat hindlimb is necessary for full contraction-induced glucose uptake (33).
Membrane glucose transport.
Muscle glucose phosphorylation.
Insulin-independent and insulin-sensitive muscle glucose uptake during exercise
Insulin-independent glucose uptake.
Insulin-dependent glucose uptake (insulin sensitivity).
Carbohydrate ingestion and exercise Carbohydrate ingestion slows the mobilization of endogenous fuels during prolonged exercise. It also slows the rate of fall of circulating glucose that would otherwise occur or leads to an overt increase in circulating glucose (7). At least two important endocrine changes accompany the increase in glucose availability. The exercise-induced fall in insulin and rise in glucagon are attenuated or eliminated altogether. The absence of the fall in insulin attenuates the increases in lipolysis and EGP, whereas a reduction in glucagon will reduce the latter (7). Although insulin acts to suppress glycogen breakdown, multiple signals are present in working muscle, and glycogen is generally not spared by carbohydrate ingestion (59).
The metabolic availability of ingested carbohydrate depends on the composition and quantity of the substrate load. In addition, exercise parameters (i.e., work intensity, duration, and modality) also determine the availability of ingested glucose. As a consequence, it is difficult to ascribe an exact metabolic efficiency of ingested glucose. In any case, a reasonable estimate might be that
Postexercise glucose metabolism
Muscle. Muscle contraction activates a number of signaling pathways, in addition to those involved with glucose transport, in a manner that is influenced by the intensity and duration of work (70,71). These include the activation of the mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase (64,72), Akt (71), and p70s6k (70) pathways. Contraction inhibits the glycogen synthase kinase-3 pathway, at least in rodent muscle (73), promoting glycogen synthesis. It is likely that the activation of some of these signaling cascades are important to the persistent adaptations to exercise and not the acute metabolic response. Activation of MAP kinase, Akt, p70s6k, and AMP kinase pathways and deactivation of the glycogen synthase kinase-3 pathway all are capable of stimulating gene transcription or protein synthesis (53).
Liver.
Metabolic adaptations to regular physical activity The adaptation of the pancreatic ß-cell to exercise training has been the most widely assessed of the endocrine organs. Basal and glucose-stimulated insulin levels are both reduced in response to regular exercise due to reduced secretion (7). Training results in decreases in the mRNA for proinsulin and glucokinase in the pancreas (78). This suggests that there are at least two potential cellular mechanisms for decreased insulin secretion. First, the reduction in proinsulin mRNA suggests that the synthesis of insulin is reduced. Second, because glucokinase is necessary for glucose sensing in the pancreas, the reduction in glucokinase mRNA may explain the decreased sensitivity of the ß-cell to glucose. Exercise training, whether endurance (79) or resistance (80), leads to increased muscle GLUT4. This increase in GLUT4 probably contributes to the increased capacity for insulin-stimulated glucose transport in trained subjects. This, of course, has important therapeutic implications for people with insulin resistance. Exercise training has been shown to stimulate insulin-stimulated PI 3-kinase in muscle (8183). There is evidence that this increase is due to IRS-1associated PI 3-kinase activity (81,83). Because PI 3-kinase is an important step in the recruitment of GLUT4 by insulin to the muscle cell surface, it is reasonable to postulate that this is one site at which regular physical activity may affect insulin signaling. Regular physical activity leads to an increase in basal and insulin-stimulated MAP kinase pathway activity (84). Although an increase in the activity of this signaling pathway is not thought to be necessary for the exercise-induced increase in insulin-stimulated glucose uptake, it may be associated with other adaptive changes in muscle. The mechanisms through which aerobic and resistance exercise increase glucose disposal are similar (85). Although resistance exercise has greater propensity than aerobic exercise to increase muscle mass and thereby glucose storage space (5), this is only one of many factors explaining its effects on glucose disposal (85). Trained subjects have an increased ability to mobilize and store NEFAs (86). The increased ability to mobilize NEFAs occurs at least in part due to increased adipocyte catecholamine sensitivity and is mediated by an increased formation and/or improved effectiveness of cAMP (87). Training increases the capacity of muscle to extract NEFAs from the blood and oxidize them (7). The mechanism for this adaptation may pertain to the enhanced capacity of trained muscle to oxidize fat (88,89) or to increased number or function of muscle fatty acid transport or binding proteins (89,90). It has been hypothesized that an excess accumulation of intramuscular lipid is associated with insulin resistance. This concept is inconsistent with results from exercise-trained subjects. Compared with sedentary control subjects, athletes with high aerobic fitness have increased intramuscular lipids, but are more insulin sensitive, not less (91).
For a more detailed review on this subject, see Ref. 92. Before beginning a program of physical activity more vigorous than brisk walking, people with diabetes should be assessed for conditions that might contraindicate certain types of exercise or predispose to injury (e.g., severe autonomic neuropathy, severe peripheral neuropathy, or preproliferative or proliferative retinopathy), which require treatment before beginning vigorous exercise, or that may be associated with increased likelihood of CVD. The patients age and previous physical activity level should be considered.
One potential area of controversy is the circumstances under which a graded exercise electrocardiogram (ECG) stress test should be considered medically indicated. We unfortunately did not find any randomized trials or large cohort studies evaluating the utility of exercise stress testing specifically in people with diabetes; the lack of such studies is an important gap in the literature. Previous ADA guidelines (93) have suggested that before beginning a vigorous or moderate exercise program, an exercise ECG stress test should be done in all diabetic individuals aged >35 years and in all individuals aged >25 years in the presence of even one additional CVD risk factor (diabetes duration >10 years for type 2 diabetes or >15 years for type 1 diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, smoking, proliferative retinopathy, nephropathy including microalbuminuria, peripheral vascular disease, or autonomic neuropathy). If this previous recommendation were followed strictly, the great majority of people with diabetes, including a large number of younger individuals with very low absolute risk of CVD, would require formal exercise stress testing before beginning even a moderate-intensity exercise program. The costs of such widespread stress testing might be prohibitive (92). The prevalence of both symptomatic and asymptomatic coronary artery disease (CAD) is higher in both type 1 and type 2 diabetic individuals compared with nondiabetic individuals of the same age-group. However, many younger diabetic patients have relatively low absolute risk for a coronary event. For example, a 38-year-old Caucasian nonsmoking man with diabetes for 5 years, HbA1c 7.5%, systolic blood pressure 130 mmHg, total cholesterol 5.2 mmol/l, and HDL cholesterol 1.1 mmol/l would have a 10-year CAD risk of only 7.3% or There is, however, some value to performing a maximal aerobic exercise test in a broader range of individuals. In addition to screening for exercise-induced ischemia, a maximal exercise test can provide useful information regarding maximal heart rate and blood pressure responses to different exercise levels, initial performance status, and prognosis, and therefore is potentially of some benefit to any individual, diabetic or otherwise. Without a maximal exercise test, one cannot know a given individuals maximum heart rate or the heart rate associated with a given percentage of the maximum. Use of the Borg scale (Rating of Perceived Exertion [97]), with target perceived intensities of "moderate," "somewhat hard," or "hard," is sometimes recommended as a possible alternative to heart ratebased targets based on maximal exercise testing. A large long-term cohort study found that exercising habitually at perceived intensity of "moderate," "somewhat strong," "strong," or more intense than "strong" were associated with adjusted relative risks for coronary heart disease of 0.86, 0.69, and 0.72, respectively, compared with exercising at perceived intensity of "weak" or less intense (98). However, there is a great deal of variability among individuals in terms of the perceived exertion associated with performing the same exercise at the same objectively defined exercise intensities (99). Likewise, the same individuals often have different ratings of perceived exertion when performing different exercises at the same intensities (e.g., running or bicycling at the same percentage of heart rate reserve) and even at equivalent stages of different treadmill protocols (Bruce versus Balke) (100). Therefore, available clinical evidence does not support any specific definitive recommendations regarding which individuals should undergo stress testing. Potential benefits must be weighed against risks and costs. Our recommendations should be considered in this context. A stress test is most useful in terms of positive predictive value for coronary ischemia when the probability of CAD is at least moderate. When the probability of CAD is low (e.g., <10% over 10 years), the number of false-positive tests is likely to be substantially greater than the number of true-positive tests. Therefore, we propose the following revised criteria for deciding when a stress test is indicated for detection of ischemia. These criteria would encompass virtually all people with diabetes with a 10-year CAD risk of at least 10% (1% per year).
Recommendations: indications for graded exercise test with ECG monitoring
The above should not be construed as a recommendation against stress testing for individuals without the above risk factors or for those who are planning less-intense exercise.
Level of evidence:
Recent clinical trials, and a number of large cohort studies, provide strong evidence for the value of physical activity in reducing the incidence of type 2 diabetes. The Da Qing IGT and Diabetes Study (103) was the first randomized trial evaluating lifestyle interventions for the prevention of type 2 diabetes. In this study, 577 people with IGT from 33 clinics were randomized, by clinic, to diet only, exercise only, diet plus exercise, or control. After 6 years of follow-up, cumulative incidence of type 2 diabetes was 68% in control, 44% in diet only, 41% in exercise only, and 46% in diet plus exercise groups. This study provides evidence that both diet and exercise can be effective diabetes prevention modalities, although their effects were not additive. The Da Qing studys subjects were far leaner (mean BMI 23 kg/m2) than most people with IGT in the western world.
More compelling evidence for the effectiveness of lifestyle interventions comes from two randomized controlled trials: the Finnish Diabetes Prevention Study (104,105) and the U.S. Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) (106,107). In the Finnish Diabetes Prevention Study (104,105), 522 overweight subjects, aged 4065 years, with IGT were randomly assigned to a lifestyle intervention or control group. The goals were to reduce weight by at least 5%; perform moderate-intensity exercise at least 30 min/day; limit total and saturated fat intake to <30 and <10%, respectively, of energy consumed; and increase fiber intake to In the Malmo study (108,109), a nonrandomized trial, 161 people with IGT who participated in a diet-and-exercise intervention were compared after 6 years with 56 individuals with IGT who were offered the same intervention and declined. The cumulative 6-year incidence of type 2 diabetes was 11% in the intervention group and 21% in the control group (108). After 12 years of follow-up in the Malmo study, overall mortality among IGT subjects was 6.5 per 1,000 person-years in the lifestyle intervention group, less than one-half of the 14.0 per 1,000 person-years in the IGT/no lifestyle intervention (109). Large cohort studies (110118) have consistently found that higher levels of physical activity and/or cardiorespiratory fitness were associated with reduced risk of developing type 2 diabetes. This was true in most studies, regardless of the presence or absence of additional risk factors for diabetes such as hypertension, parental history of diabetes, and obesity. Comparable magnitudes of risk reduction were seen with walking compared with more vigorous activity when total energy expenditures are similar (114). Therefore, there is firm and consistent evidence that programs of increased physical activity and modest weight loss reduce the incidence of type 2 diabetes in individuals with IGT. The two strongest studies, the Finnish Diabetes Prevention Study (104) and the U.S. DPP (106), do not permit one to determine the relative importance of physical activity versus diet.
Recommendations: lifestyle measures for prevention of type 2 diabetes
Level of evidence:
Effects of structured exercise interventions on glycemic control and body weight in type 2 diabetes For details of the individual aerobic exercise clinical trials, see Ref. 119.
Most clinical trials on the effects of physical activity interventions in type 2 diabetes have had small sample sizes and therefore inadequate statistical power to determine the effects of exercise on glycemic control and body weight. Boulé et al. (119) undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis on the effects of structured exercise interventions in clinical trials of duration Although the significant effect of exercise on HbA1c in these studies is encouraging, the lack of overall effect of exercise on body weight in these studies is disappointing but not surprising. The exercise volumes and program durations (mean 53 min/session, mean 3.4 sessions/week, mean duration 15 weeks) may have been insufficient to achieve the energy deficit necessary for major weight loss. Most of these studies did not examine body composition, and loss of fat might have been partially offset by increased lean body mass (119a).
Boulé et al. (120) later undertook a meta-analysis of the interrelationships among exercise intensity, exercise volume, change in cardiorespiratory fitness, and change in HbA1c. This analysis was restricted to aerobic exercise studies in which
Consistent with the above, the greatest effect of exercise on HbA1c (mean absolute postintervention HbA1c difference of 1.5% between exercise and control groups) was seen in the single study with the highest exercise intensity (121). In this study, subjects exercised at 75% of
This meta-analysis provides support for higher-intensity aerobic exercise in people with type 2 diabetes as a means of improving HbA1c. The analysis, however, is limited by the fact that only one study (121) featured an unequivocally high-intensity exercise program at 75% of
Physical activity, aerobic fitness, and risk of cardiovascular and overall mortality
Wei et al. (122) reported on 1,263 type 2 diabetic men, a subsample of >20,000 men in the Aerobics Center Longitudinal Study who underwent a detailed examination, including a maximal treadmill exercise test with ECG monitoring, physical exam, blood tests, and extensive health and lifestyle questionnaires between 1970 and 1993 and followed for mortality through 31 December 1994 using the National Death Index. Cardiorespiratory fitness was classified as low when treadmill time was at the bottom 20% of the overall cohort (including nondiabetic subjects) for the subjects age-group (3039 years, 4049 years, etc.), moderate if performance was in the 21st to 60th percentile for age-group, and high if in the highest 40% for age-group. Among the diabetic subjects, 42% were classified as "low fit" and 58% as "moderate" or "high-fit." The 50% of diabetic subjects who reported any participation in walking, jogging, or other aerobic exercise programs in the previous 3 months were classified as "active," and the other 50% were classified as "inactive." After a mean of 11.7 years of follow-up, there were 180 deaths. Mortality in the moderate-fit men was Because moderate fitness was associated with vastly lower mortality than low fitness, it is of interest to know the activity levels associated with moderate fitness. Over 17,000 mainly nondiabetic participants in the Aerobic Center Longitudinal Study completed detailed physical activity logs and a maximal exercise test. Among moderately fit subjects (21st to 60th percentile for age) whose only exercise was walking, the mean time spent per week on exercise was 130 min for men and 148 min/week for women. These times are consistent with recommendations from the U.S. Surgeon General (124) and other respected bodies (125127) to accumulate about 150 min/week of moderate-intensity exercise. Moderately fit subjects whose only exercise was jogging or running reported a mean of 90 min/week for men and 92 min/week for women. These times are consistent with an alternative and equally valid recommendation for vigorous activity 30 min three times a week.
Hu et al. (128) reported on 5,125 female nurses with type 2 diabetes who completed detailed health questionnaires every 2 years, of whom 323 developed new CVD events over 14 years of follow-up. Age-adjusted relative risks according to average hours per week of moderate or vigorous activity were 1.0 for <1 h (reference group), 0.93 for 11.9 h, 0.82 for 23.9 h, 0.54 for 46.9 h, and 0.52 for
Myers et al. (129) reported on 6,213 consecutive men referred for treadmill exercise testing for clinical reasons, including
To our knowledge, no meta-analysis of the effects of exercise training on lipids or blood pressure in people with diabetes has been published. In the general, predominantly nondiabetic population, the effects of exercise training on blood pressure and lipids are relatively modest. A meta-analysis of the effects of aerobic exercise training on blood pressure (130) (54 trials, total 2,419 participants) found a weighted mean blood pressure change through exercise interventions of 3.84 mmHg systolic and 2.58 mmHg diastolic. A review of the effects of supervised, structured aerobic exercise training on lipids (51 trials of duration Potential mechanisms through which exercise could improve cardiovascular health were reviewed recently by Stewart (137). These include decreased systemic inflammation, improved early diastolic filling (reduced diastolic dysfunction), improved endothelial vasodilator function, and decreased abdominal visceral fat accumulation.
Frequency of exercise
Exercise for weight loss and weight maintenance
The optimal volume of exercise to achieve sustained major weight loss is probably much larger than that needed to achieve improved glycemic control and cardiovascular health. In the National Weight Control Registry (142), a study of individuals who lost at least 13.6 kg (mean 30 kg) and maintained the weight loss for at least 1 year (mean 5 years), the average self-reported energy expenditure on exercise was 2,545 kcal/week among women and 3,293 kcal/week among men. These amounts would correspond to
Recommendations: aerobic exercise
Levels of evidence:
For more detailed reviews on this topic, see Refs. 148 and 149. The proven value of aerobic exercise notwithstanding, it does have some limitations. Some find aerobic exercise monotonous. Most forms of aerobic exercise would not be advisable with advanced peripheral neuropathy and are challenging in people with severe obesity. Resistance exercise training, by increasing muscle mass and endurance, often causes more rapid changes in functional status and body composition than aerobic training and might therefore be more immediately rewarding. Because each session involves many different resistance exercises, some find it less monotonous than aerobic exercise. Resistance exercise improves insulin sensitivity to about the same extent as aerobic exercise (150). Because of the increased evidence for health benefits from resistance training during the past 1015 years, the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) now recommends resistance training be included in fitness programs for healthy young and middle-aged adults (125), older adults (151), and adults with type 2 diabetes (127). With increased age, there is a tendency to progressive declines in muscle mass, leading to "sarcopenia," decreased functional capacity, decreased resting metabolic rate, increased adiposity, and increased insulin resistance, and resistance training can have a major positive impact on each of these (151).
Studies of resistance exercise in type 2 diabetes
Before 1997 there were no published studies of resistance exercise in type 2 diabetic subjects. The first such published experiment was by Eriksson et al. (152), who studied eight moderately obese type 2 diabetic patients aged 55 ± 9 years (±SD) before and after a 3-month program of moderate-intensity weight training. Muscle endurance increased by 32%. HbA1c decreased from 8.8 to 8.2% (P < 0.05), and there was a strong negative correlation between HbA1c and muscle cross-sectional area (r = 0.73). There was no control group. Ishii et al. (153) studied nine nonobese middle-aged type 2 diabetic subjects before and after 46 weeks of high-volume, moderate-intensity weight training. They were compared with control subjects unable to exercise because of orthopedic disorders. Insulin sensitivity rose 48% in exercisers but remained unchanged in control subjects. HbA1c declined from 9.6 to 7.6% in the weight training group, but also inexplicably declined from 8.8 to 7.6% in the sedentary subjects. In a nonrandomized trial (154), 18 subjects with type 2 diabetes (12 men and 6 women; mean age 62 years) underwent 5 months of moderate-intensity resistance training and were compared with 5 men and 15 women (mean age 67 years) with type 2 diabetes who did not exercise during this time. HbA1c in the exercise group was 7.5% at baseline and 7.4% at 20 weeks, whereas HbA1c in control subjects increased from 7.7 to 8.1% (P < 0.05 between groups). Interpretation of this study is complicated by a lack of randomization and imbalances at baseline in age and sex between the exercisers and control subjects. The first randomized controlled trial evaluating resistance training on glycemic control in type 2 diabetic patients was done by Dunstan et al. (155) in which 27 type 2 diabetic patients were randomized to nonexercise control or 8 weeks of circuit training in which subjects alternated between 30 s at a time of moderate-intensity weight lifting and 30 s at a time of light stationary cycling following each 30 s of weight lifting (155). In the exercising subjects, both the insulin and glucose areas under the oral glucose tolerance test curve decreased nonsignificantly, and there was no significant effect on HbA1c. In a similar study, Maiorana et al. (156) randomized 16 subjects in a crossover design to nonexercise control, followed by 8 weeks of three times per week circuit training or vice versa. During each circuit training session, subjects alternated 45 s of aerobic exercise at a moderate-intensity stationary cycling station with 45 s of moderate-intensity weight lifting. Mean HbA1c was 8.5% following sedentary periods and 7.9% following exercise periods. This study and the 1998 Dunstan et al. study (155) shared two limitations. First, duration of the intervention was insufficient to significantly affect body composition through resistance training because 36 months of training are required for clinically significant muscle hypertrophy (157). Second, the mixed resistance and aerobic training design precluded distinguishing the independent effects of each modality. In recent trial, Cuff et al. (158) randomized 28 well-controlled, obese, postmenopausal type 2 diabetic women to combined aerobic and resistance training, aerobic training alone, or a nonexercising control group. Subjects in the exercising groups participated in three 75-min gym sessions per week for 16 weeks. The aerobic exercise was at 6075% of heart rate reserve, whereas the resistance training program included two sets of 12 repetitions of five exercises. The aerobic-only group spent additional time on very-low-intensity warm-up and cool-down activity that was not expected to affect glucose metabolism. HbA1c was excellent in all groups before training (6.36.9%) and did not change with exercise training. However, insulin sensitivity assessed with glucose clamp was increased significantly more in the combined aerobic and resistance exercise group than in the aerobic exercise only or control groups. Body fat declined significantly and similarly in both exercise groups, but muscle mass increased significantly only in the combined aerobic and resistance exercise group. Two clinical trials published in late 2002 (159,160) provided much stronger evidence for the value of resistance training in type 2 diabetes. Dunstan et al. (159) randomized 36 Australian sedentary, overweight, type 2 diabetic subjects aged 6080 years to 6 months of moderate weight loss plus high-intensity resistance training (RT/WL group; progressing to three sets of 810 repetitions of 810 exercises three times per week at 7580% of maximum) or moderate weight loss plus flexibility exercise (control/WL group). Absolute HbA1c declined 1.2% in the RT/WL group compared with just 0.4% in the control/WL group (P < 0.05 between groups). Mean weight loss and fat loss were similar in both groups, but mean lean body mass increased by 0.5 kg in RT/WL subjects while decreasing 0.4 kg in control/WL subjects (P < 0.05 between groups). Castaneda et al. (160) randomized 62 older sedentary Hispanic adults (40 women and 22 men; mean age 66 years) to 16 weeks of individually supervised high-intensity resistance exercise (RT group, progressing to three sets of eight repetitions of five exercises three times per week at 7080% of maximum) or sedentary control. Mean HbA1c declined from 8.7 to 7.6% in RT but did not change in control subjects (P = 0.01 between groups), even though 72% of RT subjects (versus 3% of control subjects) had hypoglycemic medications reduced and 42% of control subjects (versus 7% of RT subjects) had hypoglycemic medications increased. Mean systolic blood pressure declined 9.7 mmHg in RT subjects and rose 7.7 mmHg in control subjects (P = 0.05 between groups). Free fatty acid concentrations declined significantly by 27% in the RT group compared with control subjects, in whom circulating free fatty acids increased by 10% (161). There was a significant positive correlation between the changes in glycosylated hemoglobin and plasma free fatty acid concentrations in the groups combined. The interventions in these two studies involved higher exercise intensity (7085% of one repetition maximum versus 4060% of one repetition maximum) and more sets of each exercise (three sets vs. one to two sets) than the other studies described | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||