© 2004 by the American Diabetes Association, Inc.
High Prevalence of Glucose Abnormalities in Patients With Hepatitis C Virus InfectionA multivariate analysis considering the liver injury
1 Diabetes Research Unit, (Division of Endocrinology), Hospital Universitari Vall dHebron, Barcelona, Spain Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Rafael Simó, Diabetes Research Unit, Hospital General Universitari Vall dHebron, Pg Vall dHebron 119-129, 08035 Barcelona, Spain. E-mail: rsimo{at}hg.vhebron.es
OBJECTIVEThe aim of this study was to compare the prevalence of both impaired fasting glucose (IFG) and diabetes between hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected patients and patients with other liver diseases but anti-HCV, taking into account the degree of liver damage. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODSA total of 642 consecutive patients attending the outpatient liver unit of a university hospital (498 anti-HCV+ and 144 anti-HCV) were prospectively recruited. Patients were classified as having chronic hepatitis (n = 472) or cirrhosis (n = 170) by means of the result of either a liver biopsy or by typical clinical features. A logistic regression model was used to determine independent associations of covariates (age, sex, BMI, HCV antibody status, and triglycerides) with the presence of glucose abnormalities. RESULTSA threefold increase in the prevalence of glucose abnormalities was observed in HCV+ patients with chronic hepatitis in comparison with HCV subjects (32 vs. 12%; P = 0.0003). In contrast, among patients with cirrhosis, although both diabetes and IFG were more prevalent in anti-HCV+ patients (40%) than in anti-HCV patients (36%), the differences were not statistically significant. Finally, the logistic regression analysis showed that HCV infection was independently related to glucose abnormalities in those patients with chronic hepatitis (odds ratio 4.26 [95% CI 2.038.93]). In contrast, HCV was not an independent predictor of glucose abnormalities in cirrhotic patients. CONCLUSIONSThe high prevalence of IFG and diabetes found in HCV-infected patients observed in our study suggests that screening for glucose abnormalities should be indicated in these patients. In addition, we provide evidence that the genuine connection between HCV infection and diabetes is initiated at early stages of hepatic disease.
Abbreviations: ALT, alanine aminotransferase AST, aspartate aminotransferase HCV, hepatitis C virus IFG, impaired fasting glucose IGT, impaired glucose tolerance NHANES III, Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey OGTT, oral glucose tolerance test
There is growing evidence to suggest an association between hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and diabetes, two common disorders that cause devastating long-term complications in a significant number of patients. Several reports have found a high prevalence of HCV infection among diabetic patients (13). Additionally, a high prevalence of diabetes has also been reported in HCV-infected patients in comparison with other liver diseases (48). Recently, the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III) has shown that people >40 years of age with HCV infection were more than three times more likely than those without HCV infection to have type 2 diabetes (9). However, some authors (10,11) have not observed an association between HCV infection and diabetes. To further explore the link between HCV infection and diabetes, we have compared the prevalence not only of diabetes but also the impaired fasting glucose (IFG) (an early predictor of diabetes) between HCV-infected patients and patients with other HCV liver diseases. The large cohort of HCV-infected patients included in the study has allowed us to evaluate separately patients with chronic hepatitis and patients with cirrhosis. This is an important confounding factor that should be considered in the analyses of the results, because glucose abnormalities are more frequent in patients with advanced liver disease. In addition, because some reports have suggested a relationship between specific HCV genotypes and some of the extrahepatic manifestations of HCV infection (12), we investigated the potential relationship of the different HCV genotypes on glucose abnormalities.
From June 2000 to December 2001, a total of 642 consecutive patients of Caucasian origin attending the outpatient liver unit of a university hospital were recruited on a weekly basis. Anti-HCV+ patients were referred from two main sources: from the blood bank of our hospital and from general practitioners. Patients were then divided into two groups according to their HCV antibody status: anti-HCV+ (n = 498) and anti-HCV (n = 144) patients. Exclusion criteria were previous treatment with either corticosteroids or interferon, a history of diabetic ketoacidosis, or age <30 years with insulin requirement (type 1 diabetes), chronic pancreatitis, alcohol consumption >50 g per day, pancreatic tumor, combined hepatic disease (liver disease with more than one etiology), and concomitant infections (other infection apart from HCV infection). Patients with cirrhosis were diagnosed by liver biopsy (compensated patients) or by typical clinical features such as signs of portal hypertension (splenomegaly, ascites, esofageal varices), hematological evidence of hypersplenism, or biochemical evidence of hepatocellular failure. Chronic hepatitis was diagnosed by liver biopsy in all patients in whom transaminases were elevated (n = 285) and in 91 of 187 patients with normal transaminases (alanine aminotransferase [ALT] and aspartate aminotransferase [AST] less than upper limit of normality for three times during 6 months) (13). We defined normal transaminases as values within the 95th percentile of healthy subjects (AST, 1240 UI/l and ALT, 844 UI/l for men; AST, 1030 UI/l and ALT, 734 UI/l for women). For the anti-HCV+ patients with normal transaminases and no liver biopsy (n = 96), we ensured that transaminases, liver function tests, and hepatic sonography were persistently normal.
Diabetes was defined on the basis of a history of therapy with oral hypoglycemic agents or insulin at the time of inclusion. In all patients not previously diagnosed, the criteria recommended by the Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes (14) were used. Thus, diabetes was diagnosed if the fasting blood glucose was
Laboratory analysis The HCV genotype was determined in 247 of the 498 (49.6%) anti-HCV+ patients. HCV genotyping was performed by RT-PCR on a segment from the core region and by hybridization of this fragment with oligonucleotide-specific probes according to the manufacturers instruction (HCV Genotyping, DNA Enzyme Immunoassay; DiaSorin, Saluggia, Italy). The assay is designed to recognize the 1a, 1b, 2a, 2b, 3, 4, 5, and 6 HCV genotypes. All patients with mixed HCV genotypes were excluded.
Statistical analysis
The main clinical characteristics of patients included in the study and the prevalence of glucose abnormalities are shown in Tables 1 and 2, respectively. We have not detected any difference in the main confounding factors (age, BMI, and stage of liver disease) between anti-HCV+ and anti-HCV. Diabetes was more prevalent among patients with HCV infection (23%) than among anti-HCV patients (18%), but this difference was not statistically significant. However, the prevalence of IFG was significantly higher in patients with HCV infection compared with anti-HCV patients (14 vs. 6%; P = 0.007). When both categories of abnormalities of glucose metabolism were considered (diabetes and IFG), the differences between both groups remained at a significant level (37 vs. 24%, P = 0.005).
In the group of patients with chronic hepatitis, both diabetes and IFG were significantly more prevalent among anti-HCV+ patients than in those anti-HCV (Table 2). In addition, when patients with normal transaminases (n = 187) were examined, the differences remained statistically significant (24% [anti-HCV+] vs. 5% [anti-HCV]; P = 0.003). In contrast, among patients with cirrhosis, although both diabetes and IFG were more prevalent in anti-HCV+ patients than in anti-HCV patients, the differences were not statistically significant (Table 2). The logistic regression analysis showed that HCV infection was independently related to glucose abnormalities (Table 3). The odds ratio for HCV infection was 2.26 (95% CI 1.473.70) when all patients were included and 4.26 (2.038.93) in patients with chronic hepatitis. In contrast, HCV was not an independent predictor of glucose abnormalities in cirrhotic patients.
The results of OGTT performed in the subset of patients with chronic hepatitis in whom diabetes was not diagnosed using the fasting plasma glucose according the American Diabetes Association criteria are shown in Table 4. OGTT enabled us to diagnose nine (18%) new cases of diabetes and 15 (30%) of IGT in anti-HCV+ patients, these figures being significantly higher than those obtained in anti-HCV patients (P = 0.02 and P = 0.04, respectively).
The HCV genotype distribution observed in our study was: 207 patients with genotype 1 (83.8%), 12 patients with genotype 2 (4.8%), 18 patients with genotype 3 (7.3%), and 10 patients with genotype 4 (4%). Differences in the prevalence of glucose abnormalities among these four genotypes were not observed (genotype 1, 39.1%; genotype 2, 33%; genotype 3, 16%; genotype 4, 33%; NS). In addition, when only patients with chronic hepatitis were considered, the prevalence was very similar in all groups (20% for genotype 1; 14.3% for genotype 2; 20% for genotype 3; 22.2% for genotype 4).
To our knowledge, this is the first study in which the prevalence of both IFG and diabetes has been evaluated in a large cohort of HCV-infected patients, taking into account the degree of liver damage. In HCV+ patients with chronic hepatitis, we observed a threefold increase in the prevalence of glucose abnormalities in comparison with HCV subjects (32 vs. 12%). However, in patients with cirrhosis, although a high frequency of glucose abnormalities were detected, differences in the prevalence of either diabetes or IFG between anti-HCV+ and anti-HCV patients were not found. These findings suggest that the genuine connection between HCV infection and diabetes is initiated at early stages of hepatic disease. In this regard, it should be emphasized that in HCV-infected patients with chronic hepatitis and normal transaminases, we have detected a fivefold higher prevalence of diabetes than that found among anti-HCV patients.
Fourteen years after the discovery of the HCV, this infection has been recognized as a major cause of chronic liver disease worldwide, affecting
If HCV infection is the cause of diabetes or, by contrast, diabetic patients are more prone to acquire HCV infection has been a subject of debate. We previously reported the absence of any particular epidemiological factor for HCV infection among the diabetic population (2). Recently, in the NHANES III, the age-adjusted odds ratio of type 2 diabetes in individuals with both HCV RNA and HCV antibody was 2.48 (95% CI 1.235.01) compared with 0.98 for subjects with HCV antibody but not RNA (18). In addition, in the present study, we have shown that not only diabetes but also IFG are more prevalent in HCV-infected patients. Taken together, these findings are not consistent with the assumption that diabetes leads to HCV infection and support the hypothesis that persistent HCV infection is associated with the subsequent development of diabetes. The specific mechanisms responsible for the development of diabetes in HCV-infected patients are not fully understood, but it seems that an increase of insulin resistance associated with either body iron stores, hepatic steatosis, or tumor necrosis factor- There are only a few reports evaluating the relationship between HCV genotypes and diabetes (3,8,11). In the present study, a much larger number of patients than previously has been included, and no differences in the prevalence of either IFG or diabetes among HCV genotypes were observed. The lower prevalence of glucose abnormalities observed in patients with genotype 3 could be attributed to the lower prevalence of cirrhosis due to the younger age of this group (data not shown). However, because there are four main HCV genotypes with a very different prevalence, the sample size used in the present study is still not large enough for a definitive conclusion to be obtained. In summary, HCV-infected patients present a high prevalence of both IFG and diabetes in comparison with nonHCV-infected patients with other liver diseases. This finding is mainly due to the group of patients with chronic hepatitis. Because HCV infection is an important predictor of diabetes, testing for glucose abnormalities should be mandatory for these patients. Further studies to clarify the mechanisms involved in this association are needed to design specific strategies to prevent diabetes in HCV-infected patients.
This study is supported by a grant from "Fundació La Marató TV3" (99/2,610), Novo Nordisk Pharma S.A. (01/0,066), and the Instituto de Salud Carlos III (G03/212, C03/08, and C03/02). We thank Dr. Antonio Gonzalez for provision of study patients and Dr. Francisco Rodriguez for his technical assistance in the HCV genotyping.
A table elsewhere in this issue shows conventional and Système International (SI) units and conversion factors for many substances. Received for publication August 13, 2003. Accepted for publication January 25, 2004.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||