HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Extract Full Text (PDF) Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Thanopoulou, A. C. Articles by Roussi, D. P. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Thanopoulou, A. C. Articles by Roussi, D. P. Social Bookmarking                What's this?

A Standardized Triglyceride and Carbohydrate Challenge

Response to Mohanlal and Holman

From the Diabetes Center, 2nd Medical Department, Athens University Medical School, Hippokration Hospital, Athens, Greece

Address correspondence to Basil G. Karamanos, MD, Associate Professor of Medicine, Athens University, Diabetes Centre, Hippokration Hospital, Vas. Sofias 114, Athens 115 27, Greece. E-mail: ippokratio{at}aias.gr

We read with interest the article by Mohanlal and Holman (1) on the oral triglyceride tolerance test, showing that the test meal they propose is palatable, acceptable to subjects, and provides reproducible evaluation of postchallenge triglyceride profiles.

Although there is a tendency to consider postprandial hypertriglyceridemia as an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease, no test meal for its evaluation has been universally accepted or normal ranges for postprandial triglycerides have been identified. Moreover, a clear distinction should be made between postprandial, which is the daily situation, and postchallenge hypertriglyceridemia.

The test meal proposed in the above study is not a regular meal and, as a test meal, has the disadvantage of a high carbohydrate content (almost to the level of an oral glucose tolerance test) eliciting insulin secretion, which modulates triglyceride removal from the circulation. However, insulin secretion varies greatly not only among diabetic subjects, but also among nondiabetic subjects, and it is very different between diabetic and nondiabetic subjects.

The total area under the curve (AUC) of triglycerides and postprandial triglyceride levels are not the best index of postprandial triglyceride responses because they are strongly influenced by fasting triglyceride concentrations. A much better index uses incremental AUC (IAUC) and incremental triglyceride levels because they reflect only the postchallenge triglyceride changes (2). Therefore, the difference in postprandial triglycerides between diabetic and nondiabetic subjects in the study of Mohanlal and Holman (1) is significant by the criterion of AUC because diabetic subjects have much higher fasting triglyceride levels (1.35 vs. 0.77 mmol/l), but when the criterion of IAUC is used, diabetic subjects do not have a significantly higher postprandial triglyceride response. Thus the greater "exposure" of diabetic subjects suggested in this study is mainly due to higher fasting triglycerides than excessive postprandial increase.

The extremely high (r = 0.909) correlation found between postchallenge and fasting triglyceride levels is misleading because fasting levels contribute >70% to the postprandial levels.

We have recently shown (3), using a test meal containing 40 g fat, 19 g protein, and only 10 g carbohydrates in nondiabetic subjects, that the triglyceride increment over the fasting value and the IAUC were not correlated with the fasting triglyceride concentration. Thus postprandial hypertriglyceridemia can occur irrespective of the fasting triglyceride concentrations and is better described by incremental values.

We think that each test meal has its advantages and disadvantages and that until a universally accepted oral triglyceride tolerance test (in analogy to the oral glucose tolerance test) is developed, test meals should be in each study and, moreover, incremental rather than absolute triglyceride values should be used for the evaluation of postchallenge hypertriglyceridemia.

References

1. Mohanlal N, Holman RR: A standardized triglyceride and carbohydrate challenge: the oral triglyceride tolerance test. Diabetes Care 27:89–94, 2004[Abstract/Free Full Text]
   
2. Carstensen M, Thomsen C, Hermansen K: Incremental area under response curve more accurately describes the triglyceride response to an oral fat load in both healthy and type 2 diabetic subjects. Metabolism 52:1034–1037, 2003[Medline]
   
3. Karamanos BG, Thanopoulou AC, Roussi-Penessi DP: Maximal postprandial triglyc-eride increase reflects postprandial hypertriglyceridaemia and is associated with the insulin resistance syndrome. Diabet Med 18:32–39, 2001[Medline]
   

CiteULike

Del.icio.us

Digg

Reddit

Technorati

This article has been cited by other articles:

				N. Mohanlal and R. R. Holman A Standardized Triglyceride and Carbohydrate Challenge: Response to Thanopoulou, Karamanos, and Roussi Diabetes Care, August 1, 2004; 27(8): 2093 - 2093. [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article Extract Full Text (PDF) Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Thanopoulou, A. C. Articles by Roussi, D. P. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Thanopoulou, A. C. Articles by Roussi, D. P. Social Bookmarking                What's this?