© 2005 by the American Diabetes Association, Inc.
Clinical, Socioeconomic, and Lifestyle Parameters Associated With Erectile Dysfunction Among Diabetic Men
1 Unit of Cardiovascular Epidemiology, Gertner Institute for Epidemiology and Health Policy Research, Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel Address correspondence and reprint requests to Ofra Kalter-Leibovici, Unit of Cardiovascular Epidemiology, Gertner Institute for Epidemiology and Health Policy Research, Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Ramat-Gan, 52621, Israel. E-mail: ofrak{at}post.tau.ac.il
OBJECTIVEErectile dysfunction is frequently observed in diabetes. The current study aims to assess the association of a comprehensive set of clinical, socioeconomic, and lifestyle parameters with erectile dysfunction in diabetic men. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODSParticipants were randomly selected from male patients (age >18 years) treated in 26 diabetes clinics in Israel. Participants completed a self-reported questionnaire on demographic, socioeconomic, and lifestyle characteristics and on erectile function, using the IIEF-15 (International Index of Erectile Function). Information on diabetes type, duration, treatment, and control; microvascular complications and cardiovascular disease; drug therapy; blood pressure; and lipid levels was also obtained. RESULTSInformation on erectile function was obtained in 1,040 patients. Their mean age was 57 years, and their median diabetes duration was 8 years (range <150). Normal erectile function was found in 13.5% of the patients and severe erectile dysfunction in 30.1%. The characteristics found to be significantly associated with erectile dysfunction [associations presented as adjusted odds ratio (95% CI)] were: patients age (5-year increments): 1.38 (1.291.48); diabetes duration (5-year increments): 1.16 (1.071.26); current HbA1c level (1% increment): 1.10 (1.011.19); any microvascular disease: 1.43 (1.091.88); cardiovascular disease: 1.78 (1.272.48); and diuretic treatment: 1.78 (1.092.91). Leisure time and work-related physical activity and consumption of small amounts of alcohol were found to be protective: 0.51 (0.360.72) and 0.70 (0.510.97), respectively. CONCLUSIONSIn diabetic men, erectile dysfunction severity increases with age and diabetes duration, poor glycemic control, presence of microvascular complications, diuretic treatment, and cardiovascular disease. Physical activity and alcohol intake may be protective. These findings can guide clinicians in taking preventive measures and undertaking early screening and treatment in high-risk patients.
Abbreviations: CVD, cardiovascular disease
Diabetic men are at high risk of developing erectile dysfunction (17). Hyperlipidemia, hypertension, and cardiovascular disease (CVD), which frequently complicate diabetes, and drugs that are commonly given to diabetic patients (i.e., antihypertension agents) are associated with higher frequency of erectile dysfunction (1,5,810). The prevalence of erectile dysfunction is expected to double by the year 2025, and the growing global epidemic of diabetes contributes to this forecast (11). Despite being associated with poor quality of life, erectile dysfunction is seldom addressed by primary-care physicians and specialists (12). The current study aims to define, from a comprehensive set of socioeconomic, lifestyle, and clinical characteristics reported to be associated with erectile dysfunction in population studies, attributes that are significantly and independently associated with greater risk for erectile dysfunction in diabetic men. This will allow physicians to identify patients at increased risk for erectile dysfunction who could benefit from preventive measures and timely treatment.
The study participants included diabetic men treated in ambulatory secondary and tertiary diabetes care clinics in Israel. A random sample of calendar days was obtained for each clinic participating in the study. During these days, all scheduled visits of diabetic male patients (age >18 years) were registered. Patients with comorbidities that might have caused erectile dysfunction regardless of diabetes (i.e., congenital or acquired spinal, pelvic, or penile malformations and injuries; prostate cancer; alcohol or drug abuse; depression; and schizophrenia) were excluded. Eligible patients were included in the study after obtaining their informed consent. The study protocol was approved by the local ethics committees. Participants completed a questionnaire containing information on sociodemographic and lifestyle characteristics. They were asked how many hours a day they were engaged in nonleisure strenuous physical activity at work and/or at home and how many hours per week they spent in leisure-time physical activity. Participants were asked about current or past cigarette smoking, the number of cigarettes smoked per day, age at the start of smoking, and age at smoking cessation. Based on this information, we calculated for each individual the number of pack-years (1 pack-year is smoking 20 cigarettes per day for 1 year; individuals who never smoked have 0 pack-years) as a single measure that quantifies lifetime cigarette smoking. Participants were asked whether they drink alcoholic beverages and the number of portions consumed per week. Participants were asked to answer the IIEF-15 (International Index of Erectile Function) questionnaire, a reliable and valid self-administered measure of erectile function used in epidemiological studies and clinical trials on erectile dysfunction. The questionnaire includes five domains, derived by factor analysis, which assess erectile function, orgasmic function, sexual desire, intercourse satisfaction, and overall satisfaction. For the current analysis, we used items 15 and 15, which are the components of the erectile function domain. Participants were asked how often they were able to get an erection during sexual activity, how often their erections were hard enough for penetration, how often they were able to penetrate their partner when attempting sexual intercourse, how often they were able to maintain their erection after penetration, how difficult it was to maintain their erection to completion of intercourse, and how they rate their confidence in being able to get and keep an erection. Scores for the first five questions ranged from 0 for "Did not attempt intercourse" to 5 for "Almost always/always." The score for the last question ranged from 1 for "Very low" to 5 for "Very high." Erectile function score was calculated as the sum of scores of these items (possible range: 130) and further recoded as a five-category ordinal variable (previously defined), ranging from normal function (score 2630) to severe dysfunction (score 110), to present a clinically meaningful gradient of erectile dysfunction severity (1315). Information on patients height, weight, age at diagnosis of diabetes, diabetes type and mode of treatment, presence of diabetic microvascular and macrovascular complications, presence of hypertension and/or hyperlipidemia, and drug therapy was obtained from the medical records using a standard questionnaire completed by the participating physicians. An abbreviated questionnaire containing pertinent information on patients who refused to participate was also completed. Data collection began in December 2001 and ended by June 2003.
Sample size calculation, data management, and analysis
Of 1,510 eligible male patients treated in 26 clinics, 1,301 (86%) agreed to participate in the study, and 1,040 (69%) provided complete information on erectile function. Normal erectile function was reported in 140 men (13.5%), whereas mild, mild-to-moderate, moderate, and severe erectile dysfunction was found in 216 (20.8%), 193 (18.5%), 178 (17.1%), and 313 (30.1%) patients, respectively.
The patients age (mean ± SD) was 57.0 ± 11.8 years, and the median diabetes duration was 8 years (range <150). Most of the patients (88%) had type 2 diabetes. Of the patients,
Associations between patients characteristics and erectile dysfunction
Because patients born in Israel were significantly younger than patients born elsewhere (mean age: 53.9 ± 12.2 vs. 61.3 ± 11.1 years, P < 0.001), we studied the association between country of birth and erectile dysfunction after controlling for the effect of age. The age-adjusted association between the country of birth and erectile dysfunction was no longer statistically significant (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.87, 95% CI 0.681.11).
Associations between characteristics of diabetes and its complications and erectile dysfunction The severity of erectile dysfunction was inversely related to the proportion of patients with type 1 diabetes. Because type 1 diabetic patients were significantly younger than type 2 patients (mean age: 45.6 ± 15.0 vs. 49.7 ± 10.6 years, P < 0.001), we tested for the association between diabetes type and erectile dysfunction after controlling for the effect of age. Diabetes type was no longer significantly associated with erectile dysfunction after controlling for the effect of age (adjusted OR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.661.39).
Associations between hypertension and hyperlipidemia and erectile dysfunction
Although erectile dysfunction severity was found to be associated with greater prevalence of physician-diagnosed hyperlipidemia, plasma triglycerides were the only plasma lipid parameter found to be significantly associated with erectile dysfunction (Table 2).
Multivariate analysis The attributes found to be positively associated with erectile dysfunction severity in the multivariate model were patients age, diabetes duration and current A1C level, having any microvascular disease, CVD, and diuretic drug therapy. Both work-related and leisure-time physical activity and any alcohol consumption were inversely related to erectile dysfunction severity (Table 3). It should be noted that most of the study participants (79.7%) avoided alcohol completely, 17.5% had up to one alcoholic drink per day, and only 2.8% reported more frequent alcohol consumption.
Physician-diagnosed hypertension and antihypertension drugs other than diuretics (i.e., ß-adrenergic receptor blockers, calcium channel antagonists, ACE inhibitors, and angiotensin receptor antagonists) were not found to be significantly associated with erectile dysfunction in the multivariate model. Cigarette smoking was not found to be significantly associated with erectile dysfunction in the multivariate analysis. To further investigate the association between cigarette smoking and erectile dysfunction, we stratified the patients according to the presence or absence of CVD. The association between cigarette smoking and erectile dysfunction was not found to be statistically significant in patients with and without CVD (data not shown). We thus conclude that the association between cigarette smoking and erectile dysfunction is probably mediated by CVD.
Comparisons of participants and nonparticipants Among participants, those who provided complete information on erectile function were significantly younger and had shorter diabetes duration compared with patients who provided incomplete information (median age: 57 vs. 64 years, P < 0.0001; median diabetes duration: 8 vs. 12 years, P = 0.002). They had also significantly less CVD compared with participants who failed to provide complete information (24.8 vs. 39.8%, P < 0.0001).
Our main findings are that erectile dysfunction is common among men treated in diabetes clinics, and its severity increases with age, diabetes duration and poor diabetes control, presence of microvascular complications, CVD, and diuretic drug therapy. Previous studies have also reported the association between erectile dysfunction and increasing age (7,1821), poor diabetes control (7,2022), presence of microvascular complications (1720), and CVD (20,21). The association between diabetes duration and erectile dysfunction has been reported in some but not all studies (7,20,21,23). Our finding that diuretics, rather than hypertension per se, are significantly associated with erectile dysfunction confirms previous reports (7,20,24). We found no residual effect of lifetime exposure to cigarette smoking, after controlling for the confounding effects of age and presence of CVD. This finding is similar to that reported by Klein et al. (20) and contradicts that reported by Fedele et al. (21). Similarly, we found no residual effect of diabetes type on erectile dysfunction, after controlling for patients age, unlike a previous report on greater frequency of erectile dysfunction in type 1 diabetic patients (21). Finally, we found that both leisure time and work-related physical activity and consumption of small amounts of alcohol may have a protective effect against erectile dysfunction. Recently, physical activity together with weight reduction were reported to improve erectile function in nondiabetic obese men (25). The protective effect of consumption of alcohol in small amounts on the risk to develop erectile dysfunction in diabetic men should be confirmed in prospective studies. Our study is cross-sectional and therefore inferences on causal relationships should be made with caution. Considering the fact that nonparticipants in our study and participants who failed to provide complete information on erectile function had higher prevalence of erectile dysfunction risk markers, we assume that the true prevalence and severity of erectile dysfunction in the study population may have been even greater than those described. The comprehensive assessment of sociodemographic, lifestyle, and disease-related characteristics allowed an in-depth investigation of the characteristics that are significantly associated with erectile dysfunction severity in diabetic men. Our study points at potentially modifiable factors associated with erectile dysfunction severity in diabetic men (i.e., diabetes control and diuretic treatment) and suggests possible protective effects of physical activity and moderate alcohol consumption. Awareness of factors associated with erectile dysfunction should guide the clinician in taking preventive measures, making timely detection, and treating erectile dysfunction.
Israel Diabetes Research Group (IDRG) Investigators Afula: Dagan B; Beer-Sheba: Harman Bohem I and Khanina DH; Haifa: Abdul-Ghani MA, Minuchin O, and Orlovsky S; Herzelia: Roitman A; Holon: Ashkenazy B and Wainstein J; Jaffa: Cohen J and Stern E; Jerusalem: Raz I, Shilo S, and Tsur A; Kiron: Lifshitz A; Nahariya: Herskovits TA; Nazareth: Zoabi M; Netanya: Norymberg C; Petach-Tiqva: Dux S and Loewinger Z; Rehovot: Knobler H; Rishon-le-Zion: Arad J and Bar-Or IS; Tel-Aviv: Rubinstein A and Yerushalmy Y; Tel-Hashomer: Kalter-Leibovici O; and Zafat: Adawi F.
This study was supported in part by an independent research grant from Pfizer, Israel.
* A complete list of the IDRG Investigators can be found in the APPENDIX.
A table elsewhere in this issue shows conventional and Système International (SI) units and conversion factors for many substances. Received for publication January 27, 2005. Accepted for publication April 4, 2005.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||