Diabetes Care
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yared, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Yale, J.-F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yared, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Yale, J.-F.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Diabetes Care 28:1836-1837, 2005
© 2005 by the American Diabetes Association, Inc.

Letters: Observations

The Effect of Blood Sample Volume on 11 Glucose Monitoring Systems

Zeina Yared, MD1,2, Khaled Aljaberi, MD1,2, Nancy Renouf1,2 and Jean-François Yale, MD1,2

1 Royal Victoria Hospital Metabolic Day Centre, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
2 McGill Nutrition Centre, Royal Victoria Hospital, MUHC, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Jean-François Yale, MD, McGill Nutrition Centre, Royal Victoria Hospital, 687 Pine Ave. West, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H3A 1A1. E-mail: jean-francois.yale{at}mcgill.ca

The effect of variable blood sample volume on the accuracy of 11 glucose meters was studied to verify the reliability of self-monitoring of blood glucose. A total of 11 meters were assessed: OneTouch FastTake, OneTouch Basic, OneTouch Profile, and SureStep (LifeScan Canada, Burnaby, B.C., Canada); AccuSoft Advantage and AccuSoft Manager (Roche, Hoffman-LaRoche, Laval, P.Q., Canada); Precision Pen and Precision QID (MediSense Canada, Mississauga, ON, Canada); and Glucometer Elite, Glucometer Elite XL, and Glucometer DEX (Bayer, Toronto, ON, Canada). Venous blood collected from 16 fasting patients with diabetes was used to test each meter brand in triplicate. Sample volumes tested were of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 10, and 20 µl. Each patient contributed to the 5-µl sample plus two other sample volumes. The 5-µl volume, which is the usual volume required by the manufacturer of most meters, was considered the reference for comparison with other volumes tested, thus excluding the confounding effects of hematocrit, humidity, hypotension, and hypoxia. Several replicates of each volume size were tested. The number of times meters gave no result or an error message was recorded. Results were then calculated as percentages of the reference value and considered accurate if within 20% of the reference, as recommended by the Food and Drug Administration–ational Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (1). It has been recognized that most current meters do not comply with the 5% accuracy recommended by the American Diabetes Association (2–4).

All meters gave mostly nonmisleading results (accurate result or error message) at the 3-µl volume or above. However, below the 3-µl volume, most meters gave misleading results (Table 1). At the 1-µl volume, the mean calculated as a percentage from the 5-µl reference volume varied between 40 and 68%. OneTouch Basic and FastTake were the most likely to give a misleading result for a smaller blood volume as shown by Somers’ d statistic. Only four meters were reliable at all volumes showing no association with the Jonckheere tests: Precision QID, Precision Pen, AccuSoft Advantage, and AccuSoft Manager (data not shown).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 1— Meter brands ranked by performance as estimated by Somers’ d statistic

 
Our results confirm that insufficient blood sample volume remains potentially a major source of user error with many of the current meters, including those with built-in detection of insufficient blood sample. Inaccurate results underestimated the real glucose value. Patients should be aware of this phenomenon since falsely low readings may result in unnecessary treatment of hypoglycemia and weight gain.

References

  1. Chen ET, Nichols JH, Show-Hong D, Hortin G: Performance evaluation of blood glucose monitoring devices. Diabetes Technol Ther 5:749–768, 2003[Medline]
  2. Böhme P, Floriot M, Sirveaux MA, Durain D, Ziegler O, Drouin P, Guerci B: Evolution of analytical performance in portable glucose meters in the last decade. Diabetes Care 26:1170–1175, 2003[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Trajanoski Z, Brunner GA, Gfrerer RJ, Wach P, Pieber TR: Accuracy of home blood glucose meters during hypoglycemia. Diabetes Care 19:1412–1415, 1996[Abstract]
  4. American Diabetes Association: Standards of medical care in diabetes. Diabetes Care 27(Suppl. 1):S15–S35, 2004

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yared, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Yale, J.-F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yared, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Yale, J.-F.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Diabetes Diabetes Care Clinical Diabetes Diabetes Spectrum