Diabetes Care
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Diabetes Care 29:474 2006
DOI: 10.2337/diacare.29.02.06.dc05-1771
© 2006 by the American Diabetes Association
This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ludwig, D. S.
Right arrow Articles by Roberts, S. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ludwig, D. S.
Right arrow Articles by Roberts, S. B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Letters: Comments and Responses

Influence of Glycemic Index/Load on Glycemic Response, Appetite, and Food Intake in Healthy Humans

Response to Alfenas and Mattes

David S. Ludwig, MD, PHD and Susan B. Roberts, PHD

Children’s Hospital Boston and Tufts University, Boston, Massachusetts

Address correspondence to David S. Ludwig, MD, PhD, Division of Endocrinology, 300 Longwood Ave., Boston, MA 02115. E-mail: david.ludwig{at}childrens.harvard.edu

In their recent article, Alfenas and Mattes (1) conclude that the glycemic index values of individual foods do not predict glycemic response to mixed meals, nor influence measures of hunger. Because the observed glycemic response did not differ between diets, the lack of effect on appetite is not surprising. Thus, the potentially important aspect of the study pertains to the prediction of glycemic index in mixed meals.

The authors’ approach was to validate published glycemic index values in a pretest, selecting 48 of 79 foods with consistent glycemic responses. However, their methods do not conform to standard procedures (24). Only 3 subjects were used for each food instead of the recommended minimum number of 10 (3). Blood glucose was measured by glucometer, a device that is not sufficiently accurate in the normal range for research purposes (4). With such a small subject number, CIs around the mean would likely overlap for most foods on both diets. From a statistical perspective, the selection of foods with an underpowered pretest using inaccurate methods would produce regression to the mean.

It is important to emphasize that published values for specific foods cannot be used for a study such as this without careful validation because published values may not have been determined correctly, the composition or manufacturing procedures of individual products may change over time, and shelf life and preparatory methods may also affect glycemic index. Such concerns are not unique to studies of glycemic index. One cannot assume, for example, that a published value for vitamin C content of Valencia orange will apply to every piece of fruit, at all times of year, from any location.

Major categories of food differ in glycemic index with reasonable consistency; most fruits, legumes, minimally processed grain products, and pasta prepared from hard wheat have low–to moderate–glycemic index, whereas highly processed grains products and pasta previously prepared and canned have a high–glycemic index. Most of the foods used by Alfenas and Mattes for the low–glycemic index diet included highly processed grain products (quick pizza, quiche, pita, bagel, etc.).

There are many studies demonstrating that the glycemic index of individual foods predicts a response to mixed meals when appropriate methodology is utilized (57). With regard to the authors’ description of our study, two of the test meals did have identical macronutrient composition and solid food components, and the measured glycemic response corresponded closely with prediction (8).

Clearly, research into the relationship between glycemic index and glycemic response merits study. To advance the dialogue, adequately powered studies employing accepted methodology will be needed. A more fundamental question is whether diets comprised of low–glycemic index foods improve important clinical end points related to obesity, diabetes, heart disease, and cancer.

References

  1. Alfenas RCG, Mattes RD: Influence of glycemic inex/load on glycemic response, appetite, and food intake in healthy humans. Diabetes Care 28:2123–2129, 2005[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Wolever TM, Vorster HH, Bjorck I, Brand-Miller J, Brighenti F, Mann JI, Ramdath DD, Granfeldt Y, Holt S, Perry TL, Venter C, Xiaomei Wu: Determination of the glycaemic index of foods: interlaboratory study. Eur J Clin Nutr 57:475–482, 2003[Medline]
  3. Brouns F, Bjorck I, Frayn KN, Gibbs AL, Lang V, Slama G, Wolever TMS: Glycaemic index methodology. Nutr Res Rev 18:145–171, 2005
  4. Velangi A, Fernandes G, Wolever TM: Evaluation of a glucose meter for determining the glycemic response of foods. Clin Chim Acta 356:191–198, 2005[Medline]
  5. Wolever TM, Bolognesi C: Prediction of glucose and insulin responses of normal subjects after consuming mixed meals varying in energy, protein, fat, carbohydrate and glycemic index. J Nutr 126:2807–2812, 1996
  6. Chew I, Brand JC, Thorburn AW, Truswell AS: Application of glycemic index to mixed meals. Am J Clin Nutr 47:53–56, 1988[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Bornet FR, Costagliola D, Rizkalla SW, Blayo A, Fontvieille AM, Haardt MJ, Letanoux M, Tchobroutsky G, Slama G: Insulinemic and glycemic indexes of six starch-rich foods taken alone and in mixed meal by type 2 diabetics. Am J Clin Nutr 45:588–595, 1987[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Ludwig DS, Majzoub JA, Al-Zahrani A, Dallal G, Blanco I, Roberts SB: High glycemic index foods, overeating, and obesity. Pediatrics 103: e26, 1999[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF LIFESTYLE MEDICINEHome page
K. Marsh and J. Brand-Miller
State of the Art Reviews: Glycemic Index, Obesity, and Chronic Disease
American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine, April 1, 2008; 2(2): 142 - 150.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
T. M. Wolever, M. Yang, X. Y. Zeng, F. Atkinson, and J. C Brand-Miller
Food glycemic index, as given in Glycemic Index tables, is a significant determinant of glycemic responses elicited by composite breakfast meals
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, June 1, 2006; 83(6): 1306 - 1312.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ludwig, D. S.
Right arrow Articles by Roberts, S. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ludwig, D. S.
Right arrow Articles by Roberts, S. B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Diabetes Diabetes Care Clinical Diabetes Diabetes Spectrum