Diabetes Care
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Diabetes Care 29:1186 2006
DOI: 10.2337/dc06-0040
© 2006 by the American Diabetes Association
This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Burke, T. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Burke, T. J.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Letters: Comments and Responses

The Effect of Monochromatic Infrared Energy on Sensation in Subjects With Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy: A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study

Response to Clifft et al.

Thomas J. Burke, PHD

From Anodyne Therapy, Tampa, Florida

Address correspondence to Thomas J. Burke, PhD, Director of Research and Clinical Affairs, Anodyne Therapy LLC, 13570 Wright Circle, Tampa, FL 33626. E-mail: tburke1{at}qwest.net

The recent paper by Clifft et al. (1) concludes that monochromatic infrared energy (MIRE) is no better than placebo MIRE in restoring sensation in the lower extremities of subjects with diabetes. We would like to suggest an alternative conclusion.

First, the subjects were treated with a MIRE device that delivered photo energy and therapeutic heat at a lower level than has been used in other clinical studies. Treatment times per session were also only 66% of those reported by Leonard et al. (2). As a result, each subject received ~50% less photo energy than used in the Leonard protocol. The clinical effect of phototherapy treatment is time dependent. In and of itself, this difference in treatment protocol may account for the authors’ inability to obtain results similar to those reported by Leonard et al. (2).

Second, while many subjects who cannot sense the larger 6.65 Semmes-Weinstein monofilament (SWM) at any site are unlikely to obtain sensation to the 5.07 SWM during a course of 12 treatments, it is possible that sensation to an intervening monofilament (for example, a 5.65 monofilament) may actually occur (2,3). These data were omitted from the article.

Third, subjects were selected solely on "... self-diagnosed..." diabetes and their inability to detect the 5.07 SWM at one of four sites on either foot. It is likely that a number of the subjects did not have diabetic peripheral neuropathy, since many exhibited sensory loss in only one limb and/or at only one site. The selection and treatment of subjects was further confounded by the fact that while some subjects received active treatment on one extremity and placebo treatment on the other, some received active or placebo treatment on both extremities.

Finally, the authors neither used a forced-choice method of SWM testing nor required the patient to specify the location at which they sensed the SWM; these are preferred testing methodologies using the SWM as it was used in other studies (2,3). Since it is well known that subjects responding to a SWM may specify a location other than that which is actually being touched, the SWM data obtained may be less accurate than it could have been, possibly explaining the apparent improvement in the placebo-treated limbs.

We believe that the reported conclusion may be attributed to the variance of the treatment dosage (amount of photo energy delivered). Additionally, it is important that utmost care is required in properly administering an SWM test to maximize the reliability of the data obtained.

Footnotes

T.J.B. is employed by Andoyne Therapy, manufacturer of the MIRE device mentioned in this letter.

References

  1. Clifft JK, Kasser RJ, Newton TS, Bush AJ: The effect of monochromatic infrared energy on sensation in subjects with diabetic peripheral neuropathy: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Diabetes Care28 :2896 –2900,2005[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Leonard DR, Farooqi MH, Myers S: Restoration of sensation, reduced pain, and improved balance in subjects with diabetic peripheral neuropathy: a double blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study with monochromatic near-infrared treatment. Diabetes Care27 :168 –172,2004[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Kochman AB, Carnegie DH, Burke TJ: Symptomatic reversal of peripheral neuropathy in subjects with diabetes. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc92 :125 –130,2002[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Burke, T. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Burke, T. J.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Diabetes Diabetes Care Clinical Diabetes Diabetes Spectrum