Diabetes Care 30:2922-2927, 2007 DOI: 10.2337/dc07-1110 © 2007 by the American Diabetes Association
Dehydroepiandrosterone Administration Counteracts Oxidative Imbalance and Advanced Glycation End Product Formation in Type 2 Diabetic Patients
1 Oncological Endocrinology Unit, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, Turin, Italy Address correspondence and reprint requests to Prof. Giuseppe Boccuzzi, Dipartimento di Fisiopatologia Clinica, Via Genova, 3-10126 Torino, Italy. E-mail: giuseppe.boccuzzi{at}unito.it
OBJECTIVE—Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) has been shown to prevent oxidative stress in several in vivo and in vitro models. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of DHEA administration on oxidative stress, pentosidine concentration, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)- /TNF- receptor system activity in patients with type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—Twenty patients were enrolled in the study and randomly assigned to the DHEA (n = 10) or placebo (n = 10) group. Twenty healthy sex- and age-matched subjects with normal glucose levels served as control subjects. DHEA was given as a single daily dose of 50 mg for 12 weeks.
RESULTS—Oxidative stress parameters were significantly higher in diabetic patients versus control subjects. Pentosidine levels, as well as soluble TNF receptor (sTNF-R)I and sTNF-RII, were also higher in diabetic patients. After DHEA, plasma levels of reactive oxygen species and hydroxynonenal dropped by 53 and 47%, respectively, whereas the nonenzymatic antioxidants glutathione and vitamin E increased (+38 and +76%, respectively). The same changes in oxidative parameters were detected in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). DHEA treatment also induced a marked decrease of pentosidine plasma concentration in diabetic patients (–50%). Moreover, the TNF-
CONCLUSIONS—Data indicate that DHEA treatment ameliorates the oxidative imbalance induced by hyperglycemia, downregulates the TNF-
Abbreviations: AGE, advanced glycation end product DHEA, dehydroepiandrosterone DHEAS, DHEA sulfate GSH, glutathione HNE, hydroxynonenal HOMA, homeostasis model assessment PBMC, peripheral blood mononuclear cell ROS, reactive oxygen species sTNF-R, soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor TNF, tumor necrosis factor
The onset and progression of diabetes complications involves a complex interplay between ranges of pathogenic mechanisms. However, emerging evidence suggests that a single early phenomenon, i.e., the overproduction of superoxide by the respiratory chain, plays a key role in the pathogenesis of both microvascular and macrovascular chronic complications (1–3). The production of advanced glycation end products (AGEs) is among the main mechanisms recruited by oxidative stress and is involved in the pathogenesis of tissue injury (3,4). AGEs progressively accumulate with time at the sites of diabetic microvascular disease and mediate tissue damage by activation of specific receptors at distant sites, via circulation (3,5). Moreover, the AGE/AGE receptor interaction, along with hyperglycemia-induced oxidative stress, possibly serves as a key activator of upstream kinases, leading to increased production of inflammatory cytokines thought to be involved in the progression of chronic diabetes complications (6). Interruption of free radical overproduction by antioxidants counteracts AGE formation (2). Nevertheless, despite convincing experimental results, clinical trials with traditional antioxidants have been disappointing (7)—the activity of the antioxidants used in those trials is limited to scavenging already-formed oxidants and is stoichiometric. A compound of physiological origin that possesses multi-targeted antioxidant properties is dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA), a multifunctional steroid that has been shown to prevent tissue damage induced by hyperglycemia in several in vivo and in vitro models (8,9). It also prevents the upregulation of AGE receptors observed in the hippocampus of streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats (10).
This study aimed to examine the effects of DHEA administration on oxidative stress, pentosidine (a marker of AGE-biogenesis) concentration, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-
The study was approved by the ethics committee at our institution, and written informed consent was obtained from all recruited subjects. It was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, small-scale study of 12-week duration. The study group comprised 20 patients with recently diagnosed type 2 diabetes treated with diet alone, having good glycemic control, and taking no drugs potentially interfering with redox status. All patients were nonsmokers and showed no evidence of chronic diabetes complications. The control group comprised 20 healthy subjects, matched by sex and age, with normal glucose levels.
After consent, patients were randomly assigned to the DHEA (n = 10) or the placebo (n = 10) group. DHEA was purchased from DHEAPharma (Miami, FL) and given as a single daily oral dose of 50 mg at 0800 h for 12 weeks. The 10 patients enrolled in the placebo group received pills that were identical in appearance to the DHEA formulation. Compliance was checked by pill counts. At baseline and at the end of the treatment, all patients were subjected to complete physical examination and fasting blood samples collected to evaluate oxidative stress parameters, pentosidine levels, and TNF-
Serum DHEA, DHEA sulfate, glucose, serum insulin, homeostasis model assessment, and A1C
Cytosol extracts from PBMCs
Pentosidine A Thermo-Finnigan Surveyor instrument (Thermo Electron, Rodano, Italy), equipped with autosampler and PDA-UV 6,000 LP detector, was used. Mass spectrometry analyses were performed using a LCQ Deca XP Plus spectrometer, with electrospray interface and ion trap as mass analyzer. The chromatographic separations were run on a Varian Polaris C18-A column (150 x 2 mm, particle size 3 µm) (Varian, Leinì, Italy), with a flow rate of 200 µl/min. Gradient mobile phase composition was adopted: 95/5 to 0/100 vol/vol 5 mmol/l heptafluorobutanoic acid in water/methanol for 13 min. The liquid chromatography column effluent was delivered to a UV detector (200–400 nm) and then to the ion source using nitrogen as sheath and auxiliary gas (Claind Nitrogen Generator apparatus; Claind, Lenno, Italy). The tuning parameters adopted for the electrospray ionization source were as follows: source current 80.00 µA, capillary voltage 3.00 V, and tube lens offset 15 V; and for ions optics, multipole one offset –5.25 V, intermultipole lens voltage –16.00 V, and multipole two offset –9.00 V. Mass spectra were collected in tandem mass spectrometry (MS) mode: MS2 of (+) 379 m/z with 33% capillary electrophoresis in the range 100–400 m/z.
Oxidative biochemical parameters HNE was determined on plasma or PBMC cytosol fractions. An aliquot of cytosol (0.5 ml) was added to an equal volume of acetonitrile:acetic acid (96:4 vol:vol). After centrifugation, the supernatant was injected into a high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC; Waters Associated, Milford, MA) Symmetry C18 column (5 mm, 3.9 x 150 mm). The mobile phase was acetonitrile:bidistilled water (42% vol:vol). The HNE concentration was calculated by comparison with a standard solution of HNE of known concentration. ROS was measured in plasma or PBMC cytosol fractions using probe 2',7'-dichlorofluorescin diacetate (DCFH-DA). DCFH-DA is a stable, nonfluorescent molecule that readily crosses the cell membrane and is hydrolyzed by intracellular esterases to the nonfluorescent 2',7'-dichlorofluorescin (DCFH), which is rapidly oxidized, in the presence of peroxides, to highly fluorescent 2',7'-dichlorofluorescein (DCF); DCF is measured fluorimetrically.
TNF-
Serum levels
Real-time RT-PCR
Primers were designed using the Beacon 5 program. Primers used were as follows: for TNF- Real-time PCR was performed using a BioRad iQ iCycler Detection System with SYBR green fluorophore. Reactions were run in a total volume of 25 µl including 12.5 µl IQ SYBR Green Supermix (BioRad Laboratories), 1 µl of each primer at 10 µmol/l concentration, and 5 µl of the reverse-transcribed cDNA template. The protocol is as follows: denaturation (95°C for 5 min) and amplification repeated 40 times (95°C for 15 s, 60°C for 1 min). A melt curve analysis was performed to ensure a single amplified product for every reaction. All reactions were carried out in at least triplicate. Analysis of relative gene expression was performed using Gene Expression Macro software (BioRad Laboratories).
Statistical analysis
Oxidative stress was significantly higher in diabetic patients than control subjects, as demonstrated by higher levels of ROS and HNE and reduced levels of GSH and vitamin E (Table 1). Pentosidine levels, as well as sTNF-RI and sTNF-RII, were also higher in diabetic patients than in control subjects, whereas serum TNF- levels were within the normal range (Table 1).
Effects of DHEA on BMI and glycemic control DHEA treatment had no effect on patients BMI. Basal glucose concentration, A1C level, and HOMA index were also unaffected (Table 2).
Effects of DHEA on oxidative state After DHEA treatment, DHEA and DHEAS levels were significantly increased (P < 0.05, Table 3). Oxidative stress parameters were significantly modified by DHEA treatment, both in plasma and in PBMCs. Plasma levels of ROS dropped by 53% (Table 3 and Fig. 1A). Likewise, a 47% reduction of plasma HNE was observed after DHEA treatment (Table 3 and Fig. 1A), whereas plasma levels of the nonenzymatic antioxidants GSH and vitamin E increased by 38 and 76%, respectively (Table 3 and Fig. 1A). The same trends were found in PBMCs (Table 3 and Fig. 1B). No correlation was found between DHEA or DHEAS levels and both oxidative and antioxidant parameters either before or after DHEA treatment.
Effects of DHEA on pentosidine levels DHEA treatment markedly decreased pentosidine plasma concentration in diabetic patients (–50%; Table 3 and Fig. 1A).
Effects of DHEA on TNF- All the above parameters were unchanged in diabetic patients given placebo (data not shown).
Type 2 diabetic patients with good glycemic control and no evidence of chronic diabetes complications, such as those enrolled in this study, show a redox imbalance characterized by increased production of highly reactive oxygen species and lower-than-normal antioxidant potential. We show here that DHEA treatment counteracts this oxidative imbalance—after 12 weeks, the concentrations of ROS and HNE were greatly reduced in both plasma and cytosol of PBMCs, whereas levels of the nonenzymatic antioxidants GSH and vitamin E were increased. These results are in agreement with the multi-targeted antioxidant effect of DHEA previously reported by our group (9,10,12). We could not find any correlation between serum DHEA or DHEAS levels and both the oxidative and the antioxidant parameters either before or after DHEA treatment. This result is not surprising, since DHEA is not a scavenger compound acting in a stoichiometric manner and exerts its antioxidants effects in a complex and non–completely defined way (10,12). Moreover, DHEA treatment significantly reduced the plasma concentration of pentosidine in these patients, in line with its effects on AGEs and AGE receptors, which have been reported in experimental diabetes (12). AGEs, whose production is triggered by oxidative stress, are clearly implicated in the development and progression of chronic diabetes complications (3,4). Among AGEs, pentosidine is a well-characterized compound and is used as a marker of AGE biogenesis (14); it is considered a good predictor for the development of microvascular complications in diabetic patients (15). Interestingly, DHEA reduces pentosidine concentration in type 2 diabetic patients without any influence on glycemic control, strongly suggesting that this effect can involve its ability to improve redox balance. Hyperglycemia-induced oxidative stress may, either directly or through the AGE/AGE receptor interaction, serve as a key activator of upstream kinases, leading to an increase in the plasma inflammatory cytokine concentrations that is thought to be involved in the progression of chronic diabetes complications (6), as well as in the development of insulin resistance (16).
Compared with control subjects, diabetic patients showed higher levels of sTNF-RI and sTNF-RII, whereas TNF- In conclusion, these data, together with the experimental data from rodents, suggest that DHEA treatment might prevent many of the events that lead to cellular damage induced by hyperglycemia, thus counteracting the onset and/or progression of chronic complications in type 2 diabetic patients. Of interest, this result was obtained in the absence of any improvement of glycemic control. Present management of hyperglycemia is based upon the assumption that the best way to reduce the risk of diabetes complications is to achieve optimal glycemic control. However, it should be pointed out that patients receiving intensive therapy designed to achieve glycemic control still develop diabetes complications, even though their prevalence is reduced (23). If hyperglycemia cannot be effectively prevented, the only way to impede diabetes complications will be to interrupt the pathways that lead from hyperglycemia to target organ damage. AGEs clearly represent one such pathway. A similar preventive activity against hyperglycemia-induced oxidative stress has been postulated for drugs such as statins, ACE inhibitors, angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockers, calcium channel blockers, and thiazolidinediones, and their clinical use to prevent chronic complications in diabetic patients has been suggested (24). Compared with these drugs, DHEA has the advantage of being a physiologic steroid without side effects at the dosage used in this study. The usefulness of this novel approach to protect diabetic patients against tissue damage appears to be worth further exploration through multicenter clinical trials.
This study was supported by the Special Project "Oncology," Compagnia San Paolo, Turin, by MIUR (Ministero Università e Ricerca), and by Regione Piemonte.
Published ahead of print at http://care.diabetesjournals.org on 17 August 2007. DOI: 10.2337/dc07-1110. A table elsewhere in this issue shows conventional and Système International (SI) units and conversion factors for many substances. The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact. Received for publication June 22, 2007. Accepted for publication August 9, 2007.
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||