DOI: 10.2337/dc06-1715 © 2007 by the American Diabetes Association
Prevalence of Hyper- and Hypoglycemia Among Inpatients With DiabetesA national survey of 44 U.S. hospitals
1 Diabetes Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts Address correspondence and reprint requests to Deborah Wexler, MD, Massachusetts General Hospital, Bulfinch 408, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114. E-mail: dwexler{at}partners.org
Abbreviations: UHC, University Health System Consortium
The recent demonstration (13) of the benefits of intensive glycemic control in hospitalized patients has renewed interest in inpatient management of diabetes. Poor glycemic control is a marker for poor quality of hospital care (4), as well as an important safety issue: insulin is one of five medications most associated with inpatient medication errors (5,6). Moreover, many hospitals continue to solely rely on insulin "sliding scales" despite the limitations of this approach (7,8). To gain a broader understanding of the current quality of inpatient diabetes management, we analyzed the prevalence and management of hyper- and hypoglycemia among 999 patients with known diabetes treated in 44 hospitals across the U.S.
Data were derived from two sources: the University Health System Consortium (UHC) Diabetes Benchmarking Project and VHA, Inc. The UHC project collected inpatient and outpatient data in 2003 by standardized chart review of 274 patients aged 18 years with type 1 and type 2 diabetes (diagnosed by their outpatient physicians), who were admitted as inpatients to 1 of 29 academic medical centers located in 20 states. Chart reviewers identified the highest and lowest glucose values during hospital admissions and recorded the highest and lowest glucose results for the 2 days preceding and following the peak and nadir.
In 20032004, 15 member hospitals of VHA, Inc, an alliance that serves
For both cohorts, we determined the prevalence of extreme glucose values (>200 or 250 mg/dl or <60, 50, or 40 mg/dl) and of persistent hyper- and hypoglycemia, defined as hyperglycemia >200 mg/dl or hypoglycemia <60 mg/dl for 3 consecutive days. We grouped insulin regimens into three categories: sliding-scale insulin alone, sliding scale with basal insulin, and basal alone. Basal insulin was defined as any long- or intermediate-acting or intravenous insulin. Because <5% of patients were on basal insulin without sliding-scale insulin, the latter two categories were combined into a single "treatment with any basal insulin" group. The prevalence of hyper- and hypoglycemia was compared between the two treatment groups using
Prevalence of hyper- and hypoglycemia and treatment patterns are shown in Table 1. Hyperglycemia was common, with the majority of patients experiencing at least one value >250 mg/dl. Extreme values were more common in patients with type 1 diabetes and patients with type 2 diabetes who were on insulin as outpatients in the UHC cohort, as well as among patients who were primarily admitted for diabetes in the VHA, Inc. cohort. Persistent hyperglycemia was present in 38% percent of the UHC cohort and 18% of the VHA, Inc. cohort. While hospitalized, 16% percent of patients with type 1 diabetes and 35% of patients with type 2 diabetes on insulin as outpatients were treated with sliding-scale insulin alone; 41% of patients in both cohorts with hyperglycemia >200 mg/dl for 3 consecutive days were treated with sliding-scale insulin alone.
Hypoglycemia to <60 mg/dl was also common, with 12% of patients in the UHC cohort and 18% in the VHA, Inc. cohort experiencing at least one episode of glucose <60 mg/dl. Severe hypoglycemia (<40 mg/dl) and recurrent hypoglycemia (<60 mg/dl for 3 days) occurred in <5% of patients in both cohorts. Hypoglycemia was more common in patients with more severe diabetes and in the subset of patients treated with basal insulin.
Over one-quarter of hospitalized Americans have diabetes (9). While disruptions in outpatient regimens and intercurrent illness and medication changes may cause hyper- and hypoglycemia during hospitalization, the availability of frequent monitoring, skilled nursing care, and glucose-lowering medications should limit hyper- and hypoglycemia in the hospital setting. Our survey of a broad cross section of 44 academic and community hospitals revealed that among 999 inpatients with diabetes, marked, persistent hyperglycemia was very common and often treated by sliding-scale regimens alone, while severe hypoglycemia was rare. Hyperglycemia is associated with increased mortality (10,11); improved control has been proven to reduce mortality in several populations. Severe hypoglycemia, a complication that partially drives undertreatment of hyperglycemia, is avoidable with appropriate management (12). Since the early 1990s, it has been known (17,18) that sliding-scale insulin protocols in the absence of a basal insulin are associated with wide glycemic variations. Consensus guidelines (4,13,14) and individual experts (15,16) suggest that optimal management of inpatient glycemia should include basal insulin with prandial insulin coverage, rather than sliding scales alone. In our analysis of data from 2003, sliding scales were prescribed as the sole treatment in 41% of the UHC cohort and 45% of the VHA, Inc. cohort. Sliding-scale insulin alone may be transiently appropriate as a dose-finding strategy or in patients with type 2 diabetes not on outpatient insulin, but it was not appropriate in the 16% of patients with type 1 diabetes and probably not for the 35% of patients with type 2 diabetes on outpatient insulin (4,19,24). Hypoglycemia <60 mg/dl was more common in patients on basal insulin, but only one-quarter of patients on basal insulin experienced hypoglycemia. It is noteworthy that hyperglycemia on 3 consecutive days was prevalent in both cohorts but was not treated with basal insulin in 50% of UHC patients and 40% of VHA, Inc. patients. Confounding by indication and underdosing may explain persistent hyperglycemia in patients who were treated with basal insulin. Persistent hyperglycemia or hypoglycemia may have been underestimated in the UHC cohort, since data were only collected for 2 days before and after the most extreme value. This analysis of 44 U.S. hospitals reveals persistent shortcomings in inpatient diabetes management. Inpatient diabetes care delivery may require systematic changes in order to meet current standards.
J.B.M. is supported by an American Diabetes Association Career Development Award. R.W.G. is supported by a National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Career Development Award (K23 DK067452). D.M.N. is supported in part by the Ida S. Charlton Charity Fund.
J.B.M. has received research grants from GlaxoSmithKline, Pfizer, and Wyeth and has served on advisory boards for GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Pfizer, and Eli Lilly. A table elsewhere in this issue shows conventional and Système International (SI) units and conversion factors for many substances. The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact. Received for publication August 12, 2006. Accepted for publication November 6, 2006.
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||