Diabetes Care
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Diabetes Care 30:432-434, 2007
DOI: 10.2337/dc06-2147
© 2007 by the American Diabetes Association
This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gerstein, H. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gerstein, H. C.
Related Collections
Right arrowPoint-Counterpoint
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Point-Counterpoint
Editorials

Point: If It Is Important to Prevent Type 2 Diabetes, It Is Important to Consider All Proven Therapies Within a Comprehensive Approach

Hertzel C. Gerstein, MD, MSC, FRCPC

From the Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism and the Population Health Research Institute, McMaster University and Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. H.C. Gerstein, Department of Medicine, Room 3V38, 1200 Main St. West, Hamilton, Ontario L8N 3Z5, Canada. E-mail: gerstein{at}mcmaster.ca

Type 2 diabetes is a common metabolic disease that is defined on the basis of glucose levels above specific thresholds. Individuals with type 2 diabetes are at high risk of blindness, renal failure, amputation, cardiovascular disease, premature death, dementia, and a variety of other chronic diseases and life-threatening events. However, unlike other risk factors for future events (e.g., hyperlipidemia or hypertension), type 2 diabetes is often associated with symptoms and discomfort related to elevated glucose levels that range from fatigue, nocturia, polyuria, and nonspecific aches and pains to dehydration and coma. Moreover, once diabetes is diagnosed, affected individuals incur additional cost and inconvenience related to disease labeling, dietary and lifestyle modification, glucose monitoring, eye assessments, and higher health and life insurance premiums.

Several trials have shown that aggressive management of type 2 diabetes can reduce the risk of microvascular disease (1–3), and that multifactorial risk factor interventions can reduce the risk of these and other consequences (4–6). These considerations and epidemiologic evidence that the risk of eye and kidney disease is well below the diagnostic thresholds for diabetes suggest that if glucose levels are prevented from rising past these thresholds, or the rise is delayed, these consequences will also be prevented or delayed. Moreover, evidence that the glucose level is a progressive risk factor for cardiovascular events (i.e., that the risk rises with the glucose level) (7–11) supports the hypothesis that preventing or delaying any rise within the nondiabetic range may reduce the risk of cardiovascular events. Finally, if ongoing clinical trials (12) show that therapies that lower elevated glucose levels in individuals with and without diabetes reduce the risk of cardiovascular events, then a therapy that both prevents diabetes and lowers or normalizes glucose levels may also reduce cardiovascular risk. Such a possibility has already been raised by at least one diabetes prevention trial (13).

Today, these are just hypotheses, and whether they are true may depend on the specific means by which the intervention prevents or slows the rise in glucose levels, in addition to whether it lowers nondiabetic glucose levels or just keeps them from rising any higher. For example, a hypothetical drug that dramatically lowers the renal threshold for glucose and causes glucosuria may have a very different effect on the consequences of diabetes than a drug that improves ß-cell function, even though both agents could prevent or slow a rise of glucose levels past the diabetes thresholds.

Clinical trials in individuals with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) have clearly shown that a program of diet and exercise can substantially reduce the incidence of type 2 diabetes by ~60% (14,15), and that the glucose-lowering drugs metformin and acarbose can reduce the incidence of diabetes by 25–30% (14,16). Most recently, the Diabetes Reduction Assessment with Ramipril and Rosiglitazone Medication (DREAM) trial showed that the addition of the thiazolidinedione rosiglitazone to healthy lifestyle advice can reduce type 2 diabetes by 60% in individuals with either impaired fasting glucose (IFG) or IGT (17), and that this metabolic benefit was accompanied by modest weight gain preferentially localized to the hip versus the abdomen. The most notable adverse effect was nonfatal congestive heart failure that occurred at a low incidence of 0.5% over 3 years.

The possibility that diabetes incidence can be reduced by agents that are not viewed as glucose-lowering agents has also been prospectively tested. One clinical trial (18) of a weight-reducing drug reported a 37% risk reduction in obese individuals. However, the fact that only 43% of the randomized participants were followed for the full study period and that benefits were most apparent in the IGT subgroup make it difficult to generalize these findings to all obese individuals. Most recently, the DREAM trial reported that ramipril did not significantly reduce diabetes incidence in individuals with IFG or IGT at low risk for cardiovascular disease (19), in contrast to a meta-analysis of previous ACE trials that suggested a modest effect on diabetes prevention in individuals at high risk for cardiovascular events (20). However, the data suggested a trend toward benefit after 3 years, and ramipril did significantly increase the secondary outcome of regression to normoglycemia (19).

Table 1 summarizes the key characteristics and results of the trials of nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic interventions that yielded a significant reduction, delay, or prevention of diabetes. It is important to note that from a clinical perspective, the words "reduction," "delay," and "prevention" are identical. For the group allocated to the interventions that yielded positive results, diabetes incidence was reduced; for the individuals within that group who did not develop diabetes, it was delayed or prevented during the trial. Moreover, if they do not develop diabetes before they die from other causes, it will have been prevented for their life. Whether either diet and exercise or the pharmacologic interventions transiently or permanently altered the underlying metabolic physiology responsible for the rise in glucose levels over time is a mechanistic or biologic question. It can be answered in part by short- and long-term follow-up of participants who did not develop diabetes during the trial and who are no longer following a diet and exercise regimen or who are no longer taking the drugs (i.e., in whom the effects of the intervention are being "washed out"). Such a question is being answered for both ramipril and rosiglitazone during a post-trial follow-up of DREAM trial participants who are taking single-blind placebo.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Table 1— Therapies proven effective in diabetes prevention trials

 
Thus, strong evidence from randomized clinical trials shows that diabetes can be prevented by dietary modification, increased physical activity, and a growing list of drugs. Moreover, it is likely that the list of drugs will continue to grow with time and that their benefits will magnify the benefits of diet and exercise. If this is true, the impact of combination therapy would indeed be impressive. For example, if the effects of rosiglitazone and a diet and exercise program similar to that offered by the Diabetes Prevention Program (both with a hazard ratio of ~0.4) are completely independent, the combination could theoretically yield a hazard ratio as low as 0.16 or a relative risk reduction of 84%. This would reduce the 3-year risk of diabetes from 26 to 4% in an individual similar to a DREAM participant; the addition of metformin would reduce it even further.

These considerations suggest that we are quickly acquiring the tools to mount a comprehensive approach to diabetes prevention, which will include both nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic approaches. Indeed, as learned from other epidemics, even this will be insufficient to stem the diabetes epidemic without broader perspective. The response to the diabetes epidemic needs to include societal changes to urban planning, food, education, and social and public health policies so they more effectively promote metabolically healthy behaviors. Public health initiatives that facilitate self assessment of the risk of diabetes with simple tools (21) and routine glucose testing of high-risk patients by health care providers need to be tested and promoted. For high-risk individuals, healthy lifestyle approaches should be recommended first and as background therapy. After subsequent evaluation of the risks and benefits for a particular individual, the addition of pharmacologic therapy should be considered when nonpharmacologic approaches are insufficient or inappropriate, and both the response to therapy and adverse effects should be monitored and reevaluated periodically. It is only if we use all of the tools at our disposal that we will be able to reverse the growing threat that diabetes poses to both the length and quality of our lives.

Acknowledgments

H.C.G. has recieved research grants from GlaxoSmithKline, King, and sanofi-aventis to conduct the DREAM trial, and honoraria from GlaxoSmithKline and sanofi-aventis and holds the McMaster University Population Health Institute Chair in Diabetes Research, which is sponsored by sanofi-aventis.

References

  1. UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group: Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). Lancet 352:837–853, 1998[Medline]
  2. UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group: Effect of intensive blood glucose control with metformin on complications in overweight patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 34). Lancet 352, 854–865, 1998
  3. Shichiri M, Kishikawa H, Ohkubo Y, Wake N: Long-term results of the Kumamoto Study on optimal diabetes control in type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes Care 23(Suppl. 2):B21–B29, 2000
  4. Gaede P, Vedel P, Parving HH, Pedersen O: Intensified multifactorial intervention in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and microalbuminuria: the Steno type 2 randomised study. Lancet 353:617–622, 1999[Medline]
  5. Rachmani R, Slavachevski I, Berla M, Frommer-Shapira R, Ravid M: Teaching and motivating patients to control their risk factors retards progression of cardiovascular as well as microvascular sequelae of type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized prospective 8 years follow-up study. Diabet Med 22:410–414, 2005[Medline]
  6. Gaede P, Vedel P, Larsen N, Jensen GV, Parving HH, Pedersen O: Multifactorial intervention and cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 348:383–393, 2003[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. DECODE Study Group, European Diabetes Epidemiology Group: Is the current definition for diabetes relevant to mortality risk from all causes and cardiovascular and noncardiovascular diseases? Diabetes Care 26:688–696, 2003[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Gerstein HC, Pogue J, Mann JF, Lonn E, Dagenais GR, McQueen M, Yusuf S: The relationship between dysglycaemia and cardiovascular and renal risk in diabetic and non-diabetic participants in the HOPE study: a prospective epidemiological analysis. Diabetologia 48:1749–1755, 2005[Medline]
  9. Lawes CM, Parag V, Bennett DA, Suh I, Lam TH, Whitlock G, Barzi F, Woodward M: Blood glucose and risk of cardiovascular disease in the Asia Pacific region. Diabetes Care 27:2836–2842, 2004[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Khaw KT, Wareham N, Bingham S, Luben R, Welch A, Day N: Association of hemoglobin A1c with cardiovascular disease and mortality in adults: the European Prospective Investigation Into Cancer in Norfolk. Ann Intern Med 141:413–420, 2004[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Gerstein HC: Glycosylated hemoglobin: finally ready for prime time as a cardiovascular risk factor. Ann Intern Med 141:475–476, 2004[Free Full Text]
  12. Buse JB, Rosenstock J: Prevention of cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes mellitus: trials on the horizon. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 34:221–235, 2005[Medline]
  13. Chiasson JL, Josse RG, Gomis R, Hanefeld M, Karasik A, Laakso M: Acarbose treatment and the risk of cardiovascular disease and hypertension in patients with impaired glucose tolerance: the STOP-NIDDM trial. JAMA 290:486–494, 2003[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Knowler WC, Barrett-Connor E, Fowler SE, Hamman RF, Lachin JM, Walker EA, Nathan DM: Reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes with lifestyle intervention or metformin. N Engl J Med 346:393–403, 2002[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Tuomilehto J, Lindstrom J, Eriksson JG, Valle TT, Hamalainen H, Ilanne-Parikka P, Keinanen-Kiukaanniemi S, Laakso M, Louheranta A, Rastas M, Salminen V, Uusitupa M: Prevention of type 2 diabetes mellitus by changes in lifestyle among subjects with impaired glucose tolerance. N Engl J Med 344:1343–1350, 2001[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Chiasson JL, Josse RG, Gomis R, Hanefeld M, Karasik A, Laakso M: Acarbose for prevention of type 2 diabetes mellitus: the STOP-NIDDM randomised trial. Lancet 359:2072–2077, 2002[Medline]
  17. Gerstein HC, Yusuf S, Bosch J, Pogue J, Sheridan P, Dinccag N, Hanefeld M, Hoogwerf B, Laakso M, Mohan V, Shaw J, Zinman B, Holman RR: Effect of rosiglitazone on the frequency of diabetes in patients with impaired glucose tolerance or impaired fasting glucose: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 368:1096–1105, 2006[Medline]
  18. Torgerson JS, Hauptman J, Boldrin MN, Sjostrom L: XENical in the Prevention of Diabetes in Obese Subjects (XENDOS) Study: a randomized study of orlistat as an adjunct to lifestyle changes for the prevention of type 2 diabetes in obese patients. Diabetes Care 27:155–161, 2004[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. DREAM Trial Investigators: Effect of ramipril on the incidence of diabetes in people with impaired fasting glucose or impaired glucose tolerance. N Engl J Med 355:1551–1562, 2006[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Dagenais GR, Pogue J, Fox K, Simoons ML, Yusuf S: Angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors in stable vascular disease without left ventricular systolic dysfunction or heart failure: a combined analysis of three trials. Lancet 368:581–588, 2006[Medline]
  21. Lindstrom J, Tuomilehto J: The diabetes risk score: a practical tool to predict type 2 diabetes risk. Diabetes Care 26:725–731, 2003[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Pan XR, Li GW, Hu YW, Wang JX, Yang WY, An ZX, Hu ZX, Lin J, Xiao JZ, Cao HB, Liu PA, Jiang XG, Jiang YY, Wang JP, Zhemg H, Zhang H, Bennett PH, Howard BV: Effects of diet and exercise in preventing NIDDM in people with impaired glucose tolerance: the Da Qing IGT and Diabetes Study. Diabetes Care 20:537–544, 1997[Abstract]
  23. Kosaka K, Noda M, Kuzuya T: Prevention of type 2 diabetes by lifestyle intervention: a Japanese trial in IGT males. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 67:152–162, 2005[Medline]
  24. Ramachandran A, Snehalatha C, Mary S, Mukesh B, Bhaskar AD, Vijay V, the Indian Diabetes Prevention Programme: The Indian Diabetes Prevention Programme shows that lifestyle modification and metformin prevent type 2 diabetes in Asian Indian subjects with impaired glucose tolerance (IDPP-1). Diabetologia 49:289–297, 2006[Medline]
  25. Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group: Prevention of type 2 diabetes with troglitazone in the Diabetes Prevention Program. Diabetes 54:1150–1156, 2005[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Buchanan TA, Xiang AH, Peters RK, Kjos SL, Marroquin A, Goico J, Ochoa C, Tan S, Berkowitz K, Hodis HN, Azen SP: Preservation of pancreatic ß-cell function and prevention of type 2 diabetes by pharmacological treatment of insulin resistance in high-risk Hispanic women. Diabetes 51:2796–2803, 2002[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Point-Counterpoint

Counterpoint: Evidence-Based Prevention of Type 2 Diabetes: The Power of Lifestyle Management
Jaakko Tuomilehto
Diabetes Care 2007 30: 435-438. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Diabetes CareHome page
American Diabetes Association
Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes--2008
Diabetes Care, January 1, 2008; 31(Supplement_1): S12 - S54.
[Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gerstein, H. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gerstein, H. C.
Related Collections
Right arrowPoint-Counterpoint
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Diabetes Diabetes Care Clinical Diabetes Diabetes Spectrum