HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: dc06-1602v1 30/5/1125    most recent Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Weinstein, R. L. Articles by McGarraugh, G. V. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Weinstein, R. L. Articles by McGarraugh, G. V. Social Bookmarking                What's this?

Accuracy of the 5-Day FreeStyle Navigator Continuous Glucose Monitoring System

Comparison with frequent laboratory reference measurements

¹ Diablo Clinical Research, Walnut Creek, California
² Diabetes and Glandular Disease Clinic, San Antonio, Texas
³ Rainier Clinical Research Center, Renton, Washington
⁴ Abbott Diabetes Care, Alameda, California

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Richard L. Weinstein, MD, Diablo Clinical Research, 2255 Ygnacio Valley Rd., Suite M, Walnut Creek, CA 94598. E-mail: rweinstein{at}diabloclinical.com

	ABSTRACT

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS-- RESULTS CONCLUSIONS-- References

 
OBJECTIVE—The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of measurements of glucose in interstitial fluid made with the FreeStyle Navigator Continuous Glucose Monitoring System with Yellow Springs Instrument laboratory reference measurements of venous blood glucose.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—Fifty-eight subjects with type 1 diabetes, aged 18–64 years, were enrolled in a multicenter, prospective, single-arm study. Each subject wore two sensors simultaneously, which were calibrated with capillary fingerstick measurements at 10, 12, 24, and 72 h after insertion. Measurements from the FreeStyle Navigator system were collected at 1-min intervals and compared with venous measurements taken once every 15 min for 50 h over the 5-day period of sensor wear in an in-patient clinical research center. Periods of high rates of change of glucose were induced by insulin and glucose challenges.

RESULTS—Comparison of the FreeStyle Navigator measurements with the laboratory reference method (n = 20,362) gave mean and median absolute relative differences (ARDs) of 12.8 and 9.3%, respectively. The percentage in the clinically accurate Clarke error grid A zone was 81.7% and that in the in the benign error B zone was 16.7%. During low rates of change (<±1 mg · dl^–1 · min^–1), the percentage in the A zone was higher (84.9%) and the mean and median ARDs were lower (11.7 and 8.5%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS—Measurements with the FreeStyle Navigator system were found to be consistent and accurate compared with venous measurements made using a laboratory reference method over 5 days of sensor wear (82.5% in the A zone on day 1 and 80.9% on day 5).

Abbreviations: ARD, absolute relative difference

	INTRODUCTION

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS-- RESULTS CONCLUSIONS-- References

 
The possible benefits of continuous glucose monitoring have been described previously (1–3). Real-time continuous glucose monitoring devices can alert patients to high or low glucose levels that might be undetected by episodic capillary blood measurements, making possible tight glycemic control without a concomitant increase in the incidence or fear of hypoglycemia (4,5). In addition, effective use of continuous glucose monitors may reduce glycemic fluctuations that have been implicated in the pathogenesis of diabetes complications (6,7).

The lack of accuracy and reliability in early-generation continuous glucose monitoring systems has been cited as a factor limiting the acceptance of this new technology as well as the development of an artificial pancreas (8,9). Recently, two real-time prospectively calibrated continuous glucose monitoring devices were approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for adjunctive use together with episodic blood glucose meters. Compared with laboratory venous samples, the mean absolute relative differences (ARDs) were 19.7 and 20.3%, and the percentages of all measurements in the clinically accurate Clarke error grid A zone were 62 and 49%, respectively (10,11).

The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy of a new device, the FreeStyle Navigator Continuous Glucose Monitoring System (Abbott Diabetes Care, Alameda, CA) compared with frequent venous samples analyzed with an accepted clinical laboratory instrument. At the time of this study, the FreeStyle Navigator system was an investigational device under review by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.

	RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS-- RESULTS CONCLUSIONS-- References

 
Fifty-eight subjects with type 1 diabetes were enrolled in the study. The protocol was approved by an institutional review board. Subjects gave informed consent for their participation in the study. Subjects ranged in age from 18 to 64 years (mean ± SD 40 ± 11 years). Forty-seven subjects were Caucasian. Thirty-six subjects were male. Twenty-one subjects were between 18 and 34 years, 33 were between 35 and 54 years, and 4 were 55 years. The length of time since diagnosis was 21.7 ± 11.7 (average ± SD) years, ranging from 0.6 to 43.5 years. BMI was 27.8 ± 4.6 (mean ± SD) with a range of 20.9 to 45.3.

The FreeStyle Navigator Continuous Glucose Monitoring System
The FreeStyle Navigator Continuous Glucose Monitoring System consists of four components: a miniature electrochemical sensor placed in the subcutaneous adipose tissue, a disposable sensor delivery unit, a radiofrequency transmitter that connects to the sensor, and a hand-held receiver to receive the sensor signal and display continuous glucose values. The electrochemical sensor inserted into the tissue is 5.5 mm long, 600 µm wide, and 250 µm thick. The sensor measures the glucose concentration in the interstitial fluid, which is well correlated with blood glucose (12,13). The sensor is a sterile, single-use disposable element that can be used for 5 days. The glucose measurement is made using the Wired Enzyme method, a modified glucose oxidase enzymatic reaction including an osmium mediator covalently bound to the supporting polymer matrix (14).

The FreeStyle Navigator receiver contains the signal processing algorithms, the user interface, and a display screen for the glucose data. The glucose data on the receiver are updated once a minute and also include a trend arrow to indicate the direction and rate of change averaged over the preceding 15 min. The trend arrows give rates of change of glucose in increments of 1 mg · dl^–1 · min^–1 from –2 to +2 mg · dl^–1 · min^–1. The user interface of the receiver allows the threshold alarms to be set at different glucose levels. The projected alarms alert the user when an extrapolated glucose value is predicted to cross the hypo- or hyperglycemia threshold. The user can select the sensitivity of the projected alarms to give a prediction time of 10, 20, or 30 min.

The receiver contains a built-in FreeStyle blood glucose meter for calibration of the continuous glucose sensor as well as for confirmatory blood glucose measurements. The sensor requires four calibrations over the 5-day wearing period at 10, 12, 24, and 72 h after sensor insertion. Blood glucose calibration values are accepted for input between 60 and 300 mg/dl and when the absolute rate of change of glucose, determined by the sensor, is <2 mg · dl^–1 · min^–1. These constraints on the acceptance of calibration input values are designed to limit the potential adverse effects of the intrinsic physiological lag between interstitial fluid glucose and blood glucose. The system does not display continuous glucose values until the first calibration, 10 h after sensor insertion. Before the first calibration, the rate of change of glucose is determined by the raw sensor current calibrated with an initial in vitro sensor sensitivity obtained on a lot-by-lot basis during manufacturing. A second calibration at 12 h is used to corroborate or correct the sensor sensitivity determined by the first in vivo calibration at 10 h.

Study design
Subjects were admitted to a health care facility in either the evening or morning. Two sensors were inserted into each subject by trained health care professionals using disposable sensor delivery units. One sensor was worn on the lateral or posterior upper arm and the other on the abdomen. Calibration of the FreeStyle Navigator system occurred at different times of day as well as both pre- and postprandially. Venous sample measurements were taken every 15 min over 50 h of in-patient admission in two or three separate sessions during the 5-day study. Samples were obtained through intravenous placement of an angiocatheter that was flushed once an hour with a heparinized solution. On separate days of in-patient admission, each subject was given an insulin challenge or a 75-g oral glucose load to obtain data during deliberately induced periods of rapidly falling and rapidly rising blood glucose levels. The insulin challenge doses were individualized to achieve blood glucose levels of 60 mg/dl in each subject. The insulin and glucose challenges ensured that there were sufficient data in both hypoglycemic (620 points or 3.0% <70 mg/dl) and hyperglycemic (3,795 points or 18.6% >240 mg/dl) ranges.

Subjects were assigned to different study schedules to provide an approximately uniform distribution of the venous reference data over the total 5-day duration of the study. Subjects were free to move about and perform daily activities except during the glucose and insulin challenges. Data from the sensor and transmitter were stored in the receiver at 1-min intervals but were not displayed to the subjects or clinic staff. All subjects continued with their previously established diabetes management regimens.

Figure 1 shows a typical profile plot for the 5 days of the study with 1-min data from the arm and abdominal sensors as well as the 15-min venous samples taken over two separate periods during the 5 days. The glucose concentration from the venous samples was measured using a YSI 2300 STAT Plus Glucose & Lactate Analyzer (YSI Life Sciences, Yellow Springs, OH). All venous measurements were made in duplicate from single blood samples using a factor of 1.12 to obtain plasma equivalent values (15).

View larger version (30K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 1— Five-day data from the Freestyle Navigator continuous glucose monitor (arm and abdomen) and 50 h of YSI venous sampling taken during two separate in-patient admissions from one subject. The timing of the glucose and insulin challenges is also shown. The shaded blocks are nighttime. The blue line is data from the FreeStyle Navigator sensor in the arm; the red line is the sensor in the abdomen. YSI measurements are shown in triangles (). The plus (+) and cross symbols (x) are the FreeStyle blood glucose calibrations for the arm and abdomen sensors, respectively.

	RESULTS

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS-- RESULTS CONCLUSIONS-- References

View larger version (54K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 2— Clarke error grid with color-coded points showing the density of paired FreeStyle Navigator and YSI measurements in 1 mg/dl squares from 1 to 10 times per square. There are 81.7% in the clinically accurate A zone, 16.7% in the benign error B zone, and only 1.7% outside of the A and B zones.

Sensor accuracy, as measured against venous sample measurements, was analyzed for different rates of change of glucose. The accuracy was highest when the absolute rate of change was <1 mg · dl^–1 · min^–1 (as measured by the sensor). The sensor accuracy, as measured by the percentage in the Clarke error grid A zone and by the mean and median ARD values, decreased as the rate of change of glucose increased.

The sensor accuracy was highest during periods of euglycemia (70–180 mg/dl) and hyperglycemia (>180 mg/dl) and lowest during hypoglycemia (<70 mg/dl). The mean and median ARD values were 11.7 and 8.9%, respectively, when blood glucose was between 140 and 180 mg/dl; 15.9 and 11.7%, respectively, when blood glucose was between 70 and 140 mg/dl; and 35.7 and 26.4%, respectively, when blood glucose was <70 mg/dl. The international standard for in vitro blood glucose measurement gives the relative difference in units of milligrams per deciliter rather than as a percentage for blood glucose <75 mg/dl (19). Accordingly, Table 1 gives the mean and median absolute differences in milligrams per deciliter for blood glucose <70 mg/dl (19.8 and 15.4 mg/dl, respectively).

Data were postprocessed to assess the accuracy of threshold and projected alarms using the 30-min prediction time for the projected alarm. In 173 instances, the YSI analyzer read <70 mg/dl for 15 min or longer. Hypoglycemia was detected either by the threshold or projected alarms in 79.8% of these instances within ±30 min of the YSI measurements. In an additional 16.2% of instances, the FreeStyle Navigator sensor glucose value was <85 mg/dl, i.e., accurate within the 15-mg/dl limit according to the international standard (19). The FreeStyle Navigator system failed to either provide an alarm or detect hypoglycemia in 4.0% of cases. An alarm was considered false if the associated YSI measurement was >85 mg/dl (i.e., 15 mg/dl high). The false alarm rate for the hypoglycemic threshold alarm was 7.2%. Raising the threshold alarm setting for hypoglycemia to 80 mg/dl resulted in improved detection of hypoglycemic events of <70 mg/dl to 92.5% total, but at the expense of an increase in the false alarm rate to 27.8%.

In 404 instances, the YSI analyzer read >240 mg/dl for 15 min or longer. Hyperglycemia was detected either by the threshold or projected alarms in 79.2% of these instances. In an additional 20.5% of instances, the FreeStyle Navigator sensor glucose value was >192 mg/dl, i.e., accurate within the 20% limit according to the international standard. The FreeStyle Navigator system failed to either alarm or detect hyperglycemia in 0.25% of cases. The false alarm rate for the hyperglycemic threshold alarm was 1.0%, where an alarm was considered false if the associated YSI measurement was <192 mg/dl (i.e., 20% low).

An approximate temporal relationship between the measurements of the FreeStyle Navigator system and the venous reference measurements was determined by applying a time shift to minimize the mean ARD for each subject. This analysis showed an optimal time shift of 12.6 min, consistent with previously published studies using multicompartment diffusion models (13,20,21).

The accuracy of arm and abdominal sensors is shown in Table 1. Data in the table suggest that the performances of sensors in the arm and abdomen were comparable over all glucose ranges and over time. There were small variations in accuracy between arm and abdomen by day, but these were neither clinically nor statistically significant. The precision of matched FreeStyle Navigator measurements on arm and abdomen had a coefficient of variation of 10% (n = 312,953). The trend arrows were in exact agreement for sensors worn on the arm and abdomen 83.6% of the time, within 1 mg · dl^–1 · min^–1 of one another an additional 14.9% of the time, and discrepant by 2 mg · dl^–1 · min^–1 1.5% of the time. The alarm performances of the arm and abdominal sensors were equivalent for hypoglycemia (<70 mg/dl) and hyperglycemia (>240 mg/dl) at a 95% confidence level.

Performance of the sensor did not differ as a function of age, sex, ethnicity, or years since diagnosis of diabetes. However, there were differences in the Clarke error grid statistics, depending on the subject's BMI. Subjects with BMI <25.0 kg/m² had 78.8% of measurements in the Clarke error grid A zone (n = 4,844). Subjects with BMI between 25.0 and 30.0 kg/m² had 82.2% of measurements in the Clarke error grid A zone (n = 7,855). Subjects with BMI >30.0 kg/m² had 84.4% of measurements in the Clarke error grid A zone (n = 3,928). The effect of BMI on sensor accuracy was similar for both arm and abdominal sensor placement.

Clinical accuracy and the rate of change of glucose
The evaluation of the FreeStyle Navigator system included periods of deliberately induced rapidly rising and rapidly falling blood glucose, i.e., in response to glucose and insulin challenges. Table 1 gives the error grid statistics as well as the mean and median ARD values as a function of the rate of change. Consistent with previously published results, Table 1 shows that 3.1% of the data were associated with a rate of change <–2 mg · dl^–1 · min^–1, 8.8% were between –2 and –1 mg · dl^–1 · min^–1, 74.7% were between –1 and 1 mg · dl^–1 · min^–1, 10.0% were between 1 and 2 mg · dl^–1 · min^–1, and 3.5% were >2 mg · dl^–1 · min^–1 (22,23). Whereas 81.7% of paired points were in the Clarke error grid A zone, 84.9% were in the A zone when the absolute rate of change was <1 mg · dl^–1 · min^–1. Similarly, the mean and median ARDs at these times were 11.7 and 8.5%, respectively.

	CONCLUSIONS—

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS-- RESULTS CONCLUSIONS-- References

 
The percentage of measurements in the Clarke A zone by day of wear ranged from 79.4 to 84.0% with an average of 81.8 ± 1.8% (mean ± SD). The highest percentage of measurements in the Clarke A zone (84.0%) occurred on the 4th day. This finding is most likely due to the absence of glucose challenges on that day of the study. As a result, only 21.2% of the total measurements on the 4th day had a rate of change of >1 mg · dl^–1 · min^–1 compared with 26.3% on the 2nd day of the study.

There was an apparent increase in accuracy at night compared with the day (87.2 and 80.6% in the Clarke A zone, respectively). This too was likely because of lower average rates of change of glucose at night than during the day, when all of the subjects’ meals were provided as well as when all of the glucose and insulin challenges were conducted. In contrast with previous reports in the literature, there was no evidence of any sustained erroneous hypoglycemic readings at night (24–26).

The introduction of a 10-h delay before the initial calibration is one of the major factors responsible for the difference in accuracy results reported here compared with previous studies using the FreeStyle Navigator system, i.e., 81.7% in the Clarke error grid A zone vs. 68% previously (14). The 10-h delay before the first calibration was instituted to allow time for the tissue around the sensor to achieve equilibrium after insertion. Variable delays in the time required for inserted sensors to achieve stable performance have been observed in many other systems (27–29). In contrast to other continuous glucose monitoring systems that are less accurate on the 1st day than the 2nd (10–11), the 10-h delay in the FreeStyle Navigator system resulted in similar accuracy on the first 2 days as shown in Table 1.

The reduced accuracy in hypoglycemia compared with euglycemia and hyperglycemia is probably multifactorial in origin. The FreeStyle Navigator device was calibrated using capillary blood glucose, whereas the reference measurements were made using venous blood glucose. Capillary glucose is comparable to venous glucose preprandially but can be as much as 20–70 mg/dl higher postprandially (30). The calibration error associated with the capillary venous differential will have a greater relative effect in the hypoglycemic range than in the euglycemic or hyperglycemic ranges.

In addition, the above-mentioned rate of change effect on accuracy was exacerbated because of the greater percentage of high rates of change during hypoglycemia. Ten percent of all data <70 mg/dl was collected when glucose was decreasing more rapidly than 2 mg · dl^–1 · min^–1 compared with only 3.1% overall. These data had a median absolute difference of 34.9 mg/dl. Similarly, 19% of all data <70 mg/dl were collected with glucose changing between –2 and –1 mg · dl^–1 · min^–1 compared with 8.8% overall. These data had a median absolute difference of 21.2 mg/dl. However, when the rate of change was between –1 and 1 mg · dl^–1 · min^–1, the median absolute difference in hypoglycemia was 12.7 mg/dl. Among all hypoglycemic values (<70 mg/dl), 54.5% fell in the Clarke A zone; however, when the rate of change was between –1 and 1 mg · dl^–1 · min^–1, 62.0% of points were in the A zone.

The accuracy of the FreeStyle Navigator system was slightly greater in subjects with higher BMI than with lower BMI. Tissue glucose nadirs in muscle have been reported to be delayed in time and reduced in magnitude relative to glucose in adipose tissue and blood, especially during insulin-induced hypoglycemia (31,32). In subjects with lower BMI values, the reduced thickness of the subcutaneous adipose tissue layer may result in closer sensor proximity to the underlying muscle tissue. Differences in adipose tissue blood flow observed in subjects with different BMI values may also contribute to the apparent effect of BMI on accuracy (33).

The effect of the physiological lag was the smallest and the accuracy of the device the highest when the rate of change of glucose was small. When the absolute rate of change of glucose was <1 mg · dl^–1 · min^–1 (74.7% of the time), the FreeStyle Navigator system had a median ARD of 8.5% compared with 5.0% with the latest episodic blood glucose meters (34). Unlike measurements made with blood glucose meters, the trend arrows on the FreeStyle Navigator receiver provide patients with information about the direction and rate of change of their physiological glucose. During high rates of change of glucose, patients may be able to incorporate trend arrow information to make more effective treatment decisions than those based solely on glucose values alone.

Whereas future generations of continuous glucose monitors are likely to improve further, the level of performance reported above (e.g., 81.7% in the Clarke A zone and 9.3% median ARD) may provide significant clinical benefits to patients with diabetes. Retrospective analysis found that the FreeStyle Navigator system was able to provide an alarm or accurately detect hypoglycemia (<70 mg/dl) in 96% and hyperglycemia (>240 mg/dl) in 99.7% of all instances measured by the venous samples. Some patients may elect to use the higher threshold alarm setting at night to further increase detection of hypoglycemia even at the expense of increased false alarms. Future clinical studies will determine whether the combination of the overall accuracy, the alarm performance and the rate of change trend arrows described above result in improved ability of patients to achieve euglycemia.

	Acknowledgments

 
The authors thank Heather Pryor, Walter Amor, and Hope Buell from Abbott Diabetes Care for analysis of the data.

	Footnotes

 
Published ahead of print at http://care.diabetesjournals.org on 2 March 2007. DOI: 10.2337/dc06-1602.

R.L.W. received consulting fees from Abbott Laboratories.

A table elsewhere in this issue shows conventional and Système International (SI) units and conversion factors for many substances.

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Received for publication July 28, 2006. Accepted for publication January 30, 2007.

	References

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS-- RESULTS CONCLUSIONS-- References

 

1. Skyler JS: The economic burden of diabetes and the benefits of improved glycemic control: the potential role of a continuous glucose monitoring system. Diabetes Technol Ther 2(Suppl. 1):S7–S12, 2000
   
2. Klonoff DC: Continuous glucose monitoring: roadmap for 21st century diabetes therapy. Diabetes Care 28:1231–1239, 2005[Free Full Text]
   
3. Buckingham B, Block J, Wilson DM: Continuous glucose monitoring. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes 12:273–279, 2005
   
4. The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. N Engl J Med 329:977–986, 1993[Abstract/Free Full Text]
   
5. Cryer PE: Hypoglycaemia: the limiting factor in the glycaemic management of type I and type II diabetes. Diabetologia 45:937–948, 2002[Medline]
   
6. Hirsch IB, Brownlee M: Should minimal blood glucose variability become the gold standard of glycemic control? J Diabetes Complications 19:178–181, 2005[Medline]
   
7. Monnier L, Mas E, Ginet C, Michel F, Villon L, Cristol JP, Colette C: Activation of oxidative stress by acute glucose fluctuations compared with sustained chronic hyperglycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes. JAMA 295:1681–1687, 2006[Abstract/Free Full Text]
   
8. Chia CW, Saudek CD: Glucose sensors: toward closed loop insulin delivery. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 33:175–195, xi, 2004[Medline]
   
9. Hovorka R: Continuous glucose monitoring and closed-loop systems. Diabet Med 23:1–12, 2006[Medline]
   
10. U.S. Food and Drug Administration: Summary of safety and effectiveness data: Medtronic Guardian RT [article online], 2006. Available from http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/PDF/p980022s011b.pdf. Accessed 21 March 2007
    
11. U.S. Food and Drug Administration: Summary of safety and effectiveness data: DexCom STS continuous glucose monitoring system [article online], 2007. Available from http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/pdf5/p050012b.pdf. Accessed 21 March 2007
    
12. Service FJ, O'Brien PC, Wise SD, Ness S, LeBlanc SM: Dermal interstitial glucose as an indicator of ambient glycemia. Diabetes Care 20:1426–1429, 1997[Abstract]
    
13. Rebrin K, Steil GM, van Antwerp WP, Mastrototaro JJ: Subcutaneous glucose predicts plasma glucose independent of insulin: implications for continuous monitoring. Am J Physiol 277:E561–E571, 1999[Medline]
    
14. Feldman B, Brazg R, Schwartz S, Weinstein R: A continuous glucose sensor based on wired enzyme technology—results from a 3-day trial in patients with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther 5:769–779, 2003[Medline]
    
15. Burnett RW, D'Orazio P, Fogh-Andersen N, Kuwa K, Kulpmann WR, Larsson L, Lewnstam A, Maas AH, Mager G, Spichiger-Keller U: IFCC recommendation on reporting results for blood glucose. Clin Chim Acta 307:205–209, 2001[Medline]
    
16. Cox DJ, Clarke WL, Gonder-Frederick L, Pohl S, Hoover C, Snyder A, Zimbelman L, Carter WR, Bobbitt S, Pennebaker J: Accuracy of perceiving blood glucose in IDDM. Diabetes Care 8:529–536, 1985[Abstract]
    
17. Clarke WL, Cox D, Gonder-Frederick LA, Carter W, Pohl SL: Evaluating clinical accuracy of systems for self-monitoring of blood glucose. Diabetes Care 10:622–628, 1987[Abstract]
    
18. Parkes JL, Slatin SL, Pardo S, Ginsberg BH: A new consensus error grid to evaluate the clinical significance of inaccuracies in the measurement of blood glucose. Diabetes Care 23:1143–1148, 2000[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
19. International Organization for Standardization: ISO 15197: In vitro diagnostic test systems—requirements for blood-glucose monitoring systems for self-testing in managing diabetes mellitus. International Organization for Standardization (ISO), Geneva, 2003
    
20. Steil GM, Rebrin K, Mastrototaro J, Bernaba B, Saad MF: Determination of plasma glucose during rapid glucose excursions with a subcutaneous glucose sensor. Diabetes Technol Ther 5:27–31, 2003[Medline]
    
21. Steil GM, Rebrin K, Hariri F, Jinagonda S, Tadros S, Darwin C, and Saad MF: Interstitial fluid glucose dynamics during insulin-induced hypoglycemia. Diabetologia 48:1833–1840, 2005[Medline]
    
22. Dunn TC, Eastman RC, Tamada JA: Rates of glucose change measured by blood glucose meter and the GlucoWatch Biographer during day, night, and around mealtimes. Diabetes Care 27:2161–2165, 2004[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
23. Kovatchev BP, Clarke WL, Breton M, Brayman K, McCall A: Quantifying temporal glucose variability in diabetes via continuous glucose monitoring: mathematical methods and clinical application. Diabetes Technol Ther 7:849–862, 2005[Medline]
    
24. McGowan K, Thomas W, Moran A: Spurious reporting of nocturnal hypoglycemia by CGMS in patients with tightly controlled type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 25:1499–1503, 2002[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
25. Metzger M, Leibowitz G, Wainstein J, Glaser B, Raz I: Reproducibility of glucose measurements using the glucose sensor. Diabetes Care 25:1185–1191, 2002[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
26. Mauras N, Beck RW, Ruedy KJ, Kollman C, Tamborlane WV, Chase HP, Buckingham BA, Tsalikian E, Weinzimer S, Booth AD, Xing D: Lack of accuracy of continuous glucose sensors in healthy, nondiabetic children: results of the Diabetes Research in Children Network (DirecNet) accuracy study. J Pediatr 144:770–775, 2004[Medline]
    
27. Rebrin K, Fischer U, Hahn von DH, von WT, Abel P, Brunstein E: Subcutaneous glucose monitoring by means of electrochemical sensors: fiction or reality? J Biomed Eng 14:33–40, 1992[Medline]
    
28. Schoonen AJ, Wientjes KJ: Glucose transport in adipose tissue. Sensors Actuators B 105:60–64, 2005
    
29. Ahmed S, Dack C, Farace G, Rigby G, Vadgama PM: Tissue implanted glucose needle electrodes: early sensor stabilisation and achievement of tissue-blood correlation during the run in period. Anal Chim Acta 537:153–161, 2005
    
30. Larson-Conn U: Differences between capillary and venous blood glucose during oral glucose tolerance tests. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 36:805–808, 1976[Medline]
    
31. Horejsi R, Moller R, Pieber TR, Wallner S, Sudi K, Reibnegger G, Tafeit E: Differences of subcutaneous adipose tissue topography between type-2 diabetic men and healthy controls. Exp Biol Med (Maywood) 227:794–798, 2002[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
32. Moberg E, Hagstrom-Toft E, Arner P, Bolinder J: Protracted glucose fall in subcutaneous adipose tissue and skeletal muscle compared with blood during insulin-induced hypoglycaemia. Diabetologia 40:1320–1326, 1997[Medline]
    
33. Larsen O, Lassen N, Quaade F: Blood flow through human adipose tissue determined with radioactive xenon. Acta Physiol Scand 66:337–345, 1966[Medline]
    
34. Weinzimer SA, Beck RW, Chase HP, Fox LA, Buckingham BA, Tamborlane WV, Kollman C, Coffey J, Xing D, Ruedy KJ: Accuracy of newer-generation home blood glucose meters in a Diabetes Research in Children Network (DirecNet) inpatient exercise study. Diabetes Technol Ther 7:675–680, 2005[Medline]
    

CiteULike

Del.icio.us

Digg

Reddit

Technorati

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. A. Weinzimer, G. M. Steil, K. L. Swan, J. Dziura, N. Kurtz, and W. V. Tamborlane Fully Automated Closed-Loop Insulin Delivery Versus Semiautomated Hybrid Control in Pediatric Patients With Type 1 Diabetes Using an Artificial Pancreas Diabetes Care, May 1, 2008; 31(5): 934 - 939. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Z. T. Bloomgarden Type 1 Diabetes and Glucose Monitoring Diabetes Care, November 1, 2007; 30(11): 2965 - 2971. [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: dc06-1602v1 30/5/1125    most recent Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Weinstein, R. L. Articles by McGarraugh, G. V. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Weinstein, R. L. Articles by McGarraugh, G. V. Social Bookmarking                What's this?