HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: dc06-2558v1 30/5/1241    most recent Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Avogaro, A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Avogaro, A. Social Bookmarking                What's this?

Incidence of Coronary Heart Disease in Type 2 Diabetic Men and Women

Impact of microvascular complications, treatment, and geographic location

¹ Division of Metabolic Diseases, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
² Metabolism and Diabetes Unit, Regione Piemonte, Chieri, Italy
³ National Institute of Health, Rome, Italy
⁴ University of Florence and Azienda Ospedaliera Careggi, Florence, Italy
⁵ Federico II University, Naples, Italy
⁶ Casa di Cura Pineta del Carso, Aurisina, Trieste, Italy
⁷ Department of Internal Medicine, and C.N.R. Institute of Clinical Physiology, University of Pisa School of Medicine, Pisa, Italy

Address correspondence and reprint requests to E. Ferrannini, MD, Department of Internal Medicine, via Roma, 67, I-56100 Pisa, Italy. E-mail: ferranni{at}ifc.cnr.it

	ABSTRACT

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS-- RESULTS-- CONCLUSIONS-- References

 
OBJECTIVE—Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the main cause of morbidity/mortality in diabetes. We set forth to determine incidence and identify predictors (including microvascular complications and treatment) of first coronary heart disease (CHD) event in CVD-free type 2 diabetic patients.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—A cohort of 6,032 women and 5,612 men, sampled from a nationwide network of hospital-based diabetes clinics, was followed up for 4 years. Baseline assessment included retinopathy, nephropathy, and foot ulcers. First CHD events (myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass grafting, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, and electrocardiogram-proven angina) were analyzed for 29,069 person-years.

RESULTS—The age-standardized incidence rate (per 1,000 person-years) of first CHD event (n = 881) was 28.8 (95% CI 5.4–32.2) in men and 23.3 (20.2–26.4) in women. Major CHD (myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass grafting, and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty) was less frequent in women (5.8 [4.3–7.2]) than in men (13.1 [10.9–15.4]; a sex ratio of 0.5 [0.4–0.6]). Incidence rates of all outcomes were higher in patients with microvascular complications (for major CHD, age-adjusted rate ratios were 1.6 [1.2–2.21] in men and 1.5 [1.0–2.2] in women). By multivariate Cox analysis, age and diabetes duration were risk predictors common in both sexes. In men, glycemic control and treated hypertension were additional independent risk factors, but residing in the south was associated with a significant 29% risk reduction. In women, higher triglycerides/lower HDL cholesterol and microvascular complications were independent risk factors.

CONCLUSIONS—In CVD-free patients with type 2 diabetes, risk of first CHD event depends on sex, geographic location, and presence of microvascular disease. Hyperglycemia and hypertension, particularly in men, and diabetic dyslipidemia, especially in women, are risk factors amenable to more aggressive treatment.

Abbreviations: AMI, acute myocardial infarction • CHD, coronary heart disease • CVD, cardiovascular disease • OHA, oral hypoglycemic agent • WHO, World Health Organization

	INTRODUCTION

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS-- RESULTS-- CONCLUSIONS-- References

 
Diabetes is estimated to be responsible for 5.2% of all deaths (1). Since the Framingham Study (2), epidemiology has consistently shown that diabetes confers an increased risk for coronary heart disease (CHD) and cardiac mortality (3–6). Salient features of this association are the following: 1) relative risk of CHD (7) and fatal CHD (8) is higher in diabetic women than in diabetic men, 2) classical and diabetes-related risk factors both contribute to total CHD risk (6), and 3) insulin treatment may be associated with a worse cardiovascular prognosis (9,10). The reasons for the excessive relative CHD risk in diabetic women compared with diabetic men are not completely understood. In the Strong Heart Study (11), the greater risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD) in women was explained in part by an apparent larger negative impact of diabetes on CVD risk factors. With regard to diabetes-related risk, the World Health Organization (WHO) multinational study found that in type 2 diabetic patients, proteinuria and retinopathy were independent predictors of CVD mortality, fatal and nonfatal acute myocardial infarction (AMI), and stroke (6). Finally, the adverse prognostic value of insulin treatment has traditionally been ascribed to the presence of more advanced disease (12). However, as plasma insulin levels per se have been reported to be significant, if weak independent CVD predictors (12), the possibility that exogenous hyperinsulinemia may counter the beneficial effects of insulin-induced metabolic control on CVD risk has not been ruled out conclusively.

Estimates of CHD incidence in diabetic patients vary across studies and countries. Source data are remarkably heterogeneous with regard to selection criteria and risk assessment, and few observational studies provide information on the natural course of CHD in patients who periodically refer to hospital-based outpatient clinics. Furthermore, the natural history of CVD in diabetes is changing. In a recent analysis of the Framingham original and offspring cohorts (13), incident CVD among adults with diabetes was reported to have halved between the examinations in 1959–1966 and 1977–1995.

In the present study, we set forth to determine the incidence of first CHD events in a large, recent cohort of type 2 diabetic patients who are regularly followed at outpatient clinics and to identify risk factors that are associated with CHD burden, including presence of microvascular complications and pharmacological treatment.

	RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS-- RESULTS-- CONCLUSIONS-- References

 
The DAI (Diabetes and Informatics Study Group, Association of Clinical Diabetologists, Istituto Superiore di Sanità) is an observational study of type 2 diabetic patients attending hospital-based diabetes clinics of the National Health Service (in Italy, 80% of known diabetic patients are seen at these clinics at least once a year). A detailed description of the study methodology has been reported (14). In brief, the reference population consisted of all patients with type 2 diabetes (according to WHO criteria) diagnosed after 39 years of age who were seen between September and December 1998 or between March and June 1999. At each clinic, patients were chosen (on a 1:4 basis) so as to create a sample representative of the diabetic population seen at that center. A systematic sampling technique was applied by including every fourth patient. A total of 201 clinics throughout the country volunteered for the prevalence study (14), and 157 of them were involved in the incidence study. For this analysis, patients with prevalent CHD (see below for definition), cerebral thromboembolism, or peripheral amputations were excluded; the present analysis is thus restricted to 11,644 patients (6,032 women [4.4% premenopausal] and 5,612 men) without evidence of macrovascular disease at baseline. Follow-up data were collected yearly between 2000 and 2003. A total of 1,665 patients (788 men and 877 women) were lost to follow-up; their baseline clinical characteristics were essentially similar to those of the patients with follow-up data (data not shown).

Data collection and definitions
At the baseline and each subsequent visit, a questionnaire was administered. Recorded information included personal, anthropometric, and lifestyle data (including smoking habits and alcohol consumption); clinical history and data relevant to microvascular (retinopathy, blindness, nephropathy, and foot ulcers) and macrovascular (CHD, cerebral thromboembolism, and peripheral amputations) complications; laboratory data; and pharmacological treatment (with oral hypoglycemic agents [OHAs] and antihypertensive or lipid-lowering agents). Patients were classified as having CHD if they had one of the following: 1) a history of hospital admission for either fatal or nonfatal AMI or an episode of angina, 2) a 12-lead electrocardiogram positive for prior AMI or angina by the Minnesota Coding System (criteria I, 1–3; IV, 1–3; V, 1–2; and VII, 1), and 3) a history of coronary artery bypass graft or percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. All patients had had at least one electrocardiogram in the 12 months preceding enrollment to exclude prior AMI. Information, including death, on patients who did not show up at the scheduled visits was obtained from telephone interviews to the patients, their relatives, or physicians. All documentation was reviewed by an ad hoc committee to confirm diagnosis.

Measurements
Serum A1C and a lipid profile were determined in the fasting state. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure were measured after the patient had been seated for at least 5 min. A patient was defined as hypertensive if he/she had a systolic blood pressure 140 mmHg and/or a diastolic blood pressure 90 mmHg or was on antihypertensive treatment. Urinary albumin excretion was obtained in a timed overnight collection; microalbuminuria was defined as urinary albumin extretion between 30 and 300 mg/l in at least three successive measurements in the absence of other reasons for proteinuria (urinary infection, glomerulonephritis, kidney stones, bladder cancer, etc.). Familial CHD was defined as having a first-degree relative with a CHD episode at <55 years of age. Retinopathy was assessed by an ophthalmologist through comprehensive dilated eye examination and high-quality stereoscopic photographs.

Statistical analysis
Patients were followed-up from the baseline visit to the first of the following: a CHD event, death, end of the study, or center drop out. Population characteristics are given as mean (±2 SE) or median for continuous variables and proportions (±2 SE) for categorical data. Differences between groups were assessed using the t test or nonparametric (Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis) tests for normal and nonnormal data, respectively, and the ² test for categorical data. CHD incidence density was standardized on the age distribution of the 1998 Italian population. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models were used to examine risk factors for CHD incidence. Preliminary data exploration was carried out separately in men and women by univariate Cox models of all covariates and adjusted by age at baseline. Interaction between cholesterol level and lipid-lowering therapy and between blood pressure and antihypertensive therapy were tested. All covariates with P < 0.1 were entered into the final multivariate models. Results were checked by a stepwise technique; the proportional hazards assumption was checked with Schoenfeld residuals. Variables were used without transformation, although the quadratic term for the continuous covariates was first considered and assessed by likelihood-ratio testing. Results are given as hazard ratios and 95% CIs.

The relationship between insulin treatment and CHD risk was explored by propensity score methodology, which is an alternative technique to control for confounding in observational studies (15). The propensity score is defined as a subject's probability of treatment assignment, conditional on measured covariates. It is a one-dimensional variable that summarizes the multidimensional pretreatment covariates computed by logistic regression. The propensity score was used as a covariate in additional Cox models. All analyses were performed using the Stata 8.0 statistical package.

	RESULTS—

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS-- RESULTS-- CONCLUSIONS-- References

 
During 4 years of follow-up, 881 incident CHD events were observed, yielding an age-standardized incidence rate (per 1,000 person-years) of 28.8 (95% CI 25.4–32.2) in men and 23.3 (20.2–26.4) in women. AMI, major CHD events (AMI, coronary artery bypass grafting, and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty), and fatal CHD were all significantly more frequent in men than women, whereas rates of CHD other than AMI were similar (Table 1). In the comparison of patients with or without incident CHD (Table 2), age was slightly higher, diabetes duration was longer, and prevalence of hypertension and insulin treatment (alone or in combination with OHAs) was higher in both men and women with a CHD event. In addition, fewer men with incident CHD resided in the southern and island regions of Italy than in north and central Italy. In women with incident CHD, serum triglycerides were more often >150 mg/dl (46 vs. 41%, P < 0.04). In both men and women, the prevalence of microvascular complications (any or none) at baseline was significantly higher among patients who developed CHD than among those who did not. Correspondingly, incidence rates of all outcomes were higher in patients with rather than without complications (Table 1).

In preliminary analyses on the entire cohort, sex interacted with several risk factors; subsequent analyses were therefore performed separately by sex. In univariate models, age, disease duration, serum triglycerides, microangiopathy, antihypertensive therapy, and insulin treatment were shared risk factors, whereas waist girth, glycemic control, total cholesterol, blood pressure, and geographic area were additional risk predictors in men and HDL cholesterol and lipid-lowering treatment were so in women. The output of a multivariate Cox model of incident CHD, including all risk factors significant at the P < 0.1 level in univariate analysis, is shown in Fig. 1. Age was a strong predictor in both men and women, a risk increase of 14 and 23% per decade, respectively, as was diabetes duration. A1C was an additional risk factor in men (with an estimated 14% risk increase for each 20% increment above the upper limit of normal), whereas a serum triglyceride level 150 mg/dl was an independent risk predictor in women. HDL cholesterol was a protective factor in women. The presence of microvascular complications enhanced risk by 35% in women and 20% in men. Men residing in southern regions had a 29% lower CHD risk than men elsewhere in Italy. With regard to pharmacological treatment, hypertension therapy was an independent predictor in men, while insulin treatment (alone or in combination with OHAs) predicted a 36% higher risk in women but fell short of statistical significance. These results were almost identical whether or not the propensity score was included in the model.

View larger version (32K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 1— Independent predictors of incident CHD in diabetic men (black) and women (red). Hazard ratios are calculated for the indicated increments in the value of the variable.

	CONCLUSIONS—

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS-- RESULTS-- CONCLUSIONS-- References

First, in observational studies of CHD in diabetes, incidence rates have widely varied as a function of ethnic background, inclusion criteria, definition of end points, and duration of follow-up. In the PROactive (PROspective pioglitAzone Clinical Trial in macroVascular Events) Study, for example, 16% of type 2 diabetic patients had a first major coronary event within 3 years; in that study, however, the majority of patients were at high risk with more than half suffering from a major CVD episode at enrollment (16). Likewise, higher AMI incidence was found in the Helsinki Heart Study (1.5% per year in 135 patients) (17) and also in another Finnish population-based study (2.9% per year in 1,059 patients) (18). Conversely, Lee et al. (19) reported a CHD (fatal and nonfatal AMI) incidence rate of 10.8 per 1,000 person-years in a larger group of patients with no prior AMI, a figure comparable to ours. Similarly, in the recent Fenofibrate Intervention and Event Lowering in Diabetes (FIELD) Study in type 2 diabetic patients with clinical characteristics and selection criteria similar to our cohort, the 4,900 patients randomized to placebo had a CHD incidence of 11.7 per 1,000 person-years (20). Thus, our relatively low CHD incidence appears to reflect multiple circumstances. First, large population surveys tend to report lower incidence than smaller studies (21). Second, countries in southern Europe consistently show lower CHD rates than northern/central European countries (22). Last, our diabetic population may be on a declining trend of CVD events similar to those recently documented in the Framingham population (13) (although the lack of historical comparison in the Italian population makes this interpretation only tentative).

Second, our findings on sex differences in incident CHD follow the trend emerging from recent meta-analyses of prospective studies showing that the impact of diabetes on both CHD (7) and fatal CHD (8) is greater in women than men. In fact, in the only population-based, nationwide dataset available for Italy (the CUORE Study) (23), the age-standardized incidence of major CHD events in the 35–74 year age-group was 6.6 (95% CI 5.8–7.3) per 1,000 person-years in men and 2.0 (1.6–2.3) in women (an age-adjusted women-to-men ratio of 0.3 [95% CI 0.2–0.3]) (S. Giampaoli, personal communication). The corresponding rates in our cohort in the same age range were approximately twice those of the general population (women-to-men ratio of 0.5 [0.4–0.6]). Thus, CHD, in all its severe manifestations, was less frequent (in absolute terms) in our diabetic women than in diabetic men but with a women-to-men gradient 50% higher than that seen in the background population. Less severe CHD (angina and signs of chronic myocardial ischemia) actually showed a similar incidence in men and women with diabetes. In a recent analysis of published data (24), the higher CHD rates of diabetic women have been ascribed to a more adverse profile of classic CHD risk factors. In our cohort, however, no major difference in level of risk factors except for smoking habit or pharmacological treatment stood out in the comparison of men and women (Table 2). This sex effect therefore remains unexplained.

Third, the excess CVD risk associated with microangiopathy has been repeatedly reported in cross-sectional studies or small incident cohorts (25–29). The WHO multinational study of vascular disease in diabetes (6) found that heavy proteinuria and retinopathy carried a significant relative risk for CVD mortality; the type 2 diabetic cohorts in that study were, however, relatively small, and confounding by A1C was not analyzed. No large prospective study in type 2 diabetic patients free of CVD has assessed the risk of a first CHD event associated with microangiopathy in the context of the full set of classical risk factors. The current data offer robust evidence that microvascular complications markedly enhance the risk of a subsequent first coronary event in men as well as women. Interestingly, the excess risk ranged 60–90% for AMI and 20–40% for non-AMI CHD but rose to 160–120% for fatal CHD (Table 1). Even in the fully adjusted Cox model, microangiopathy retained an independent predictive power, especially in women (Fig. 1). This suggests that mechanisms other than exposure to hyperglycemia underlie the codevelopment of micro- and macroangiopathy. Advanced glycation end products (29), oxidative stress (30), endothelial dysfunction (31), and subclinical inflammation (32) are candidate mechanisms that can simultaneously impact on the structure and function of both small and large vessels; each has been shown to be operative in type 2 diabetes (33). Established microvascular dysfunction may directly contribute to macroangiopathy by compromising blood supply to large vessels. Alternatively in our patients, hyperglycemia over the years preceding enrollment may have been a common pathogenetic predecessor of both micro- and macrovascular damage.

Fourth, in the full Cox model, the pattern of CHD risk factors was partly sex specific with glycemic control and hypertension predominating in men and diabetic dyslipidemia (i.e., high triglycerides and low HDL cholesterol) and microangiopathy predominating in women. In general, the predictivity for CHD of poor glycemic control, hypertension, and dyslipidemia in diabetic patients is well established (34–36), but there is little data on sex-specific risk patterns to compare with our findings. With regard to hypertension, the stronger risk in men could be explained by the fact that our diabetic women were more often on antihypertensive treatment than men (59 vs. 44% of all patients, P < 0.001). Conversely, the stronger risk conveyed by higher serum triglyceride levels in women could be due to the fact that their baseline triglyceride levels were higher (P < 0.001) (lipid-lowering treatment was equally infrequent in men and women). In addition, in women, lower HDL cholesterol levels were a further independent predictor. Thus, diabetic dyslipidemia appears to be a confirmed risk factor, especially in women with diabetes. Interestingly, men but not women living in southern Italy had a substantially lower CHD hazard than patients elsewhere in the country. This protective effect, which resisted all adjustments, may be the first trace of a lifestyle effect to have been detected in patients with diabetes. Adherence to a Mediterranean diet (which is more prevalent in southern Italy) has been convincingly associated with a reduction in cardiovascular risk (37,38). Postmenopausal women may be inherently more resistant to a diet-related risk reduction, as suggested by a recent study (39). Interactions among risk factors may be distinct in men and women such as smoking causing a higher risk in men or menopause doing the same with dyslipidemia in women.

In the UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) (40), no influence of antidiabetes treatment on CVD end points in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetic patients emerged. In general, the evidence that insulin treatment might be a risk factor for CVD in type 2 diabetes is inconclusive (12), but an especially high mortality has been reported in older diabetic women treated with insulin (10). In our cohort, insulin treatment was a risk factor in univariate analysis, and a higher proportion of women were on insulin than men (18.9 vs.14.0%, P < 0.001; insulin alone or in combination). In women, a higher propensity score was associated with a higher CHD risk. However, in the multivariate Cox model, insulin treatment showed a borderline significant association with incident CHD in women whether or not the propensity score was included in the model (Fig. 1). Though the propensity score may work better when used for matching or stratification than for regression (15), this result would suggest that in diabetic women, insulin treatment might be an independent CHD risk factor regardless of treatment assignment. A prudent summary is that insulin treatment is not an independent CHD risk factor either in diabetic men or, most likely, in diabetic women.

In conclusion, this nationwide study outlines the natural history of CHD in type 2 diabetic patients managed by current standards of care. The emerging risk profile carries important therapeutic implications. First, glycemic control should be intensified and antihypertensive treatment optimized. Second, the proportion of patients eligible for lipid-lowering therapy is certainly higher than the proportion of them actually on lipid-lowering treatment. Lowering LDL cholesterol, if quite effective, may not be sufficient, especially in diabetic women in whom diabetic dyslipidemia is a significant independent risk factor.

	Acknowledgments

 
The study was supported in part by the Italian National Institute of Health, the Italian Association of Clinical Diabetologists (AMD), and the Diabetes and Informatics Study Group (DIAINF).

	Footnotes

 
Published ahead of print at http://care.diabetesjournals.org on 8 February 2007. DOI: 10.2337/dc06-2558.

A table elsewhere in this issue shows conventional and Système International (SI) units and conversion factors for many substances.

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Received for publication December 18, 2006. Accepted for publication February 1, 2007.

	References

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS-- RESULTS-- CONCLUSIONS-- References

 

1. Roglic G, Unwin N, Bennett PH, Mathers C, Tuomilehto J, Nag S, Connolly V, King H: The burden of mortality attributable to diabetes: realistic estimates for the year 2000. Diabetes Care28:2130–2135, 2005[Abstract/Free Full Text]
   
2. Kannel WB, McGee DL: Diabetes and cardiovascular disease: the Framingham Study. JAMA 241:2035–2038, 1979[Abstract]
   
3. Fox CS, Sullivan L, D'Agostino RB Sr, Wilson PW: The significant effect of diabetes duration on coronary heart disease mortality: the Framingham Heart Study. Diabetes Care 27:704–708, 2004[Abstract/Free Full Text]
   
4. Almdal T, Scharling H, Jensen JS, Vestergaard H: The independent effect of type 2 diabetes mellitus on ischemic heart disease, stroke, and death: a population-based study of 13,000 men and women with 20 years of follow-up. Arch Intern Med 164:1422–1426, 2004[Abstract/Free Full Text]
   
5. Vaccaro O, Eberly LE, Neaton JD, Yang L, Riccardi G, Stamler J, Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial Research Group: Impact of diabetes and previous myocardial infarction on long-term survival: 25-year mortality follow-up of primary screenees of the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial. Arch Intern Med 164:1438–1443, 2004[Abstract/Free Full Text]
   
6. Fuller JH, Stevens LK, Wang SL: Risk factors for cardiovascular mortality and morbidity: the WHO multinational study of vascular disease in diabetes. Diabetologia 44(Suppl. 2):S54–S64, 2001
   
7. Lee WL, Cheung AM, Cape D, Zinman B: Impact of diabetes on coronary artery disease in women and men: a meta-analysis of prospective studies. Diabetes Care 23:962–968, 2000[Abstract]
   
8. Huxley R, Barzi F, Woodward M: Excess risk of fatal coronary heart disease associated with diabetes in men and women: meta-analysis of 37 prospective cohort studies. BMJ 332:73–78, 2006[Abstract/Free Full Text]
   
9. Kronmal RA, Barzilay JI, Tracy RP, Savage PJ, Orchard TJ, Burke GL: The relationship of fasting serum radioimmune insulin levels to incident coronary heart disease in an insulin-treated diabetic cohort. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 89:2582–2588, 2004
   
10. Kronmal RA, Barzilay JI, Smith NL, Psaty BM, Kuller LH, Burke GL, Furberg C: Mortality in pharmacologically treated older adults with diabetes: the Cardiovascular Health Study, 1989–2001. PloS Med 3:e400, 2006[Medline]
    
11. Howard BV, Cowan LD, Go O, Welty TK, Robbins DC, Lee ET, the Strong Heart Investigators: Adverse effects of diabetes on multiple cardiovascular disease risk factors in women. Diabetes Care 21:1258–1265, 1998[Abstract]
    
12. Ruige JB, Assendelft WJ, Dekker JM, Kostense PJ, Heine RJ, Bouter LM: Insulin and risk of cardiovascular disease: a meta-analysis. Circulation 97:996–1001, 1998[Medline]
    
13. Fox CS, Coady S, Sorlie PD, Levy D, Meigs JB, D'Agostino RB Sr, Wilson PW, Savage PJ: Trends in cardiovascular complications of diabetes. JAMA 292:2495–2499, 2004[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
14. The DAI Study Group: Prevalence of coronary heart disease in a cohort of type 2 diabetic patients in Italy: the DAI study. Diabet Med 21:738–745, 2004[Medline]
    
15. D'Agostino RB Jr: Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group. Stat Med 17:2265–2281, 1998[Medline]
    
16. Dormandy JA, Charbonnel B, Eckland DJ, Erdmann E, Massi-Benedetti M, Moules IK, Skene AM, Tan MH, Lefebvre PJ, Murray GD, Standl E, Wilcox RG, Wilhelmsen L, Betteridge J, Birkeland K, Golay A, Heine RJ, Koranyi L, Laakso M, Mokan M, Norkus A, Pirags V, Podar T, Scheen A, Sherbaum W, Schernthaner G, Schmitz O, Skrha J, Smith U, Taton J, PROactive investigators: Secondary prevention of macrovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes in the PROactive Study (PROspective pioglitAzone Clinical Trial In macroVascular Events): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 366:1279–1289, 2005[Medline]
    
17. Koskinen P, Manttari M, Manninen V, Huttunen JK, Heinonen OP, Frick MH: Coronary heart disease incidence in NIDDM patients in the Helsinki Heart Study. Diabetes Care 15:820–825, 1992[Abstract]
    
18. Haffner SM, Lehto S, Ronnemaa T, Pyorala K, Laakso M: Mortality from coronary heart disease in subjects with type 2 diabetes and in nondiabetic subjects with and without prior myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 339:229–234, 1998[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
19. Lee CD, Folsom AR, Pankow JS, Brancati FL, Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study Investigators: Cardiovascular events in diabetic and nondiabetic adults with or without history of myocardial infarction. Circulation 109:855–860, 2004[Medline]
    
20. Keech A, Simes RJ, Barter P, Best J, Scott R, Taskinen MR, Forder P, Pillai A, Davis T, Glasziou P, Drury P, Kesaniemi YA, Sullivan D, Hunt D, Colman P, d'Emden M, Whiting M, Ehnholm C, Laakso M, FIELD Study Investigators: Effects of long-term fenofibrate therapy on cardiovascular events in 9,795 people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (the FIELD study): randomised controlled trial. Lancet 366:1849–1861, 2005[Medline]
    
21. Selvin E, Marinopoulos S, Berkenblit G, Rami T, Brancati FL, Powe NR, Golden SH: Meta-analysis: glycosylated hemoglobin and cardiovascular disease in diabetes mellitus. Ann Intern Med 141:421–431, 2004[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
22. Janssen F, Kunst AE: Cohort patterns in mortality trends among the elderly in seven European countries, 1950–1999. Int J Epidemiol34:1149–1159, 2005
    
23. Palmieri L, Donfrancesco C, Giampaoli S, Trojani M, Panico S, Vanuzzo D, Pilotto L, Cesana G, Ferrario M, Chiodini P, Sega R, Stamler J: Favorable cardiovascular risk profile and 10-year coronary heart disease incidence in women and men: results from the Progetto CUORE. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 13:562–570, 2006[Medline]
    
24. Kanaya AM, Grady D, Barrett-Connor E: Explaining the sex difference in coronary heart disease mortality among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis. Arch Intern Med 162:1737–1745, 2002[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
25. Miettinen H, Haffner SM, Lehto S, Ronnemaa T, Pyorala K, Laakso M: Proteinuria predicts stroke and other atherosclerotic vascular disease events in nondiabetic and non-insulin-dependent diabetic subjects. Stroke 27:2033–2039, 1996[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
26. Mattock MB, Barnes DJ, Viberti G, Keen H, Burt D, Hughes JM, Fitzgerald AP, Sandhu B, Jackson PG: Microalbuminuria and coronary heart disease in NIDDM: an incidence study. Diabetes 47:1786–1792, 1998[Abstract]
    
27. Hiller R, Sperduto RD, Podgor MJ, Ferris FL 3rd, Wilson PW: Diabetic retinopathy and cardiovascular disease in type II diabetics: the Framingham Heart Study and the Framingham Eye Study. Am J Epidemiol 128:402–409, 1988[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
28. Miettinen H, Haffner SM, Lehto S, Ronnemaa T, Pyorala K, Laakso M: Retinopathy predicts coronary heart disease events in MIDDM patients. Diabetes Care 19:1445–1448, 1996[Abstract]
    
29. Peppa M, Uribarri J, Vlassara H: The role of advanced glycation end products in the development of atherosclerosis. Curr Diab Rep 4:31–36, 2004[Medline]
    
30. Madamanchi NR, Vendrov A, Runge MS: Oxidative stress and vascular disease. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 25:29–38, 2005[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
31. Scognamiglio R, Negut C, De Kreutzenberg SV, Tiengo A, Avogaro A: Postprandial myocardial perfusion in healthy subjects and in type 2 diabetic patients. Circulation 112:179–184, 2005[Medline]
    
32. Aras R, Sowers JR, Arora R: The proinflammatory and hypercoagulable state of diabetes mellitus. Rev Cardiovasc Med 6:84–97, 2005[Medline]
    
33. Nest RW: Correlation between cardiovascular disease and diabetes mellitus: current concepts. Am J Med 116 (Suppl. 5A):11S–22S, 2004
    
34. Laakso M: Hyperglycemia and cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes 48:937–942, 1999[Abstract]
    
35. Wang S-L, Head J, Stevens L, Fuller JH, WHO Multinational Study Group: Excess mortality and its relation to hypertension and proteinuria in diabetic patients: the WHO Multinational Study of Vascular Disease in Diabetes. Diabetes Care 19:305–312, 1996[Abstract]
    
36. Lu W, Resnick HE, Jablonski KA, Jones KL, Jain AK, Howard WJ, Robbins DC, Howard BV: Non-HDL cholesterol as a predictor of cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetes: the Strong Heart Study. Diabetes Care 26:16–23, 2003[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
37. Trichopoulou A, Costacou T, Bamia C, Trichopoulou D: Adherence to a Mediterranean diet and survival in a Greek population. N Engl J Med 348:2599–608, 2003[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
38. Estruch R, Martinez-Gonzalez MA, Corella D, Salas-Salvado J, Ruiz-Gutierrez V, Covas MI, PREDIMED Study Investigators: Effects of a Mediterranean-style diet on cardiovascular risk factors: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 145:1–11, 2006[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
39. Howard BV, Van Horn L, Hsia J, Manson JE, Stefanick ML, Wassertheil-Smoller S, Kuller LH, LaCroix AZ, Langer RD, Lasser NL, Lewis CE, Limacher MC, Margolis KL, Mysiw WJ, Ockene JK, Parker LM, Perri MG, Phillips L, Prentice RL, Robbins J, Rossouw JE, Sarto GE, Schatz IJ, Snetselaar LG, Stevens VJ, Tinker LF, Trevisan M, Vitolins MZ, Anderson GL, Assaf AR, Bassford T, Beresford SA, Black HR, Brunner RL, Brzyski RG, Caan B, Chlebowski RT, Gass M, Granek I, Greenland P, Hays J, Heber D, Heiss G, Hendrix SL, Hubbell FA, Johnson KC, Kotchen JM: Low-fat dietary pattern and risk of cardiovascular disease: the Women's Health Initiative Randomized Controlled Dietary Modification Trial. JAMA 295:655–666, 2006[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
40. Turner RC, Millns H, Neil HAW, Stratton IM, Manley SE, Matthews DE: Risk factors for coronary artery disease in non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus: United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS: 23). BMJ 316:823–828, 1998[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    

CiteULike

Del.icio.us

Digg

Reddit

Technorati

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. J. Fowler Microvascular and Macrovascular Complications of Diabetes Clin. Diabetes, April 1, 2008; 26(2): 77 - 82. [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: dc06-2558v1 30/5/1241    most recent Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Avogaro, A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Avogaro, A. Social Bookmarking                What's this?