Diabetes Care 30:1269-1271, 2007 DOI: 10.2337/dc06-1790 © 2007 by the American Diabetes Association
High-Intensity Training Improves Plasma Glucose and Acid-Base Regulation During Intermittent Maximal Exercise in Type 1 Diabetes
1 Department of Exercise and Sports Science, University of Sydney, Lidcombe, New South Wales, Australia Address correspondence and reprint requests to Alison R. Harmer, PhD, University of Sydney, P.O. Box 170, Lidcombe, NSW, Australia 1825. E-mail: a.harmer{at}usyd.edu.au
Abbreviations: HIE, high-intensity exercise SID, strong ion difference
In individuals without diabetes, high-intensity exercise (HIE) training may reduce (1) the characteristic postexercise rise in plasma glucose with HIE (24) and reduces (5,6) the marked acid-base balance perturbations (58). In type 1 diabetes, continuous HIE induces sustained hyperglycemia (9,10), while very brief intermittent HIE may reduce hyperglycemia (11). Acid-base disturbances during exercise may be heightened in type 1 diabetes (1214). Effects of HIE training on glycemia and acid-base balance during intermittent HIE in type 1 diabetes are unknown; thus, despite the potential clinical importance of such exercise, there is no evidence on which to base patient guidelines. The aim of the present study was thus to investigate the effects of HIE training on glycemia and acid-base regulation during intermittent HIE in type 1 diabetes.
Eight subjects with type 1 diabetes (duration of diabetes 7.1 ± 4.0 years) and seven subjects without diabetes (control group), all of whom were healthy and took no medications (other than insulin in type 1 diabetic subjects), consented to participate. The study was approved by the human ethics committees of The University of Sydney and the South Sydney West Area Health Service. Control subjects closely matched those with diabetes for age (type 1 diabetes 25 ± 4 years and control 25 ± 4 years), BMI (25.4 ± 3.2 and 23.8 ± 5.0 kg/m2, respectively), and VO2peak (42.7 ± 12.2 and 43.7 ± 6.2 ml · kg1 · min1), as detailed in a related study that reported effects of sprint training on muscle sodium-potassium ATPase and on plasma potassium during maximal exercise (15). Testing was conducted after overnight fasting. Type 1 diabetic subjects delayed their morning insulin. Subjects completed four 30-s maximal exercise bouts (EB14) (each separated by 4 min rest) on a cycle ergometer. Supervised high-intensity cycling training (5,15,16) was then conducted thrice-weekly for 7 weeks. The number of cycle bouts per training session progressed from 4 in week 1 to 6 in week 2, 8 in week 3, and 10 in weeks 47. After training, EB14 were repeated, with power output set to be identical to the pretraining test. Arterialised blood was sampled at rest, before and in the final seconds of EB14, and during recovery. Blood gases, insulin, glucose, and A1C were analyzed as previously described (15). With the exception of lactate, which was analyzed using a standard enzymatic technique (17), plasma ions were analyzed using an automated blood gas analyzer (Corning 865; Chiron Diagnostics). The plasma strong ion difference (SID) was calculated: SID (mmol/) = ([potassium] + [sodium]) ([lactate] + [chloride]). Data were analyzed with repeated-measures ANOVA (SPSS version 10.0 for Windows). When significance was detected, pairwise comparison between means was performed by a contrast technique. Significance was accepted at P < 0.05. Results are reported as means ± SD.
Exercise training did not alter A1C in type 1 diabetic subjects (preexercise 8.6 ± 0.8%, postexercise 8.1 ± 0.6%; P = 0.09). Resting plasma glucose was higher in type 1 diabetic subjects than in control subjects (13.3 ± 5.3 and 5.0 ± 0.3 mmol/l, respectively; P < 0.001), with no change after training. In type 1 diabetes, exercise induced a sustained rise in plasma glucose from rest ( [PG]) (Fig. 1A). In control subjects, [PG] peaked at 4 min recovery and did not fall significantly thereafter. After training, [PG] was markedly attenuated in both groups (P = 0.001) (Fig. 1A). Insulin did not differ between groups at rest or after training, however, fell slightly during exercise in type 1 diabetic subjects, in contrast to the rise in control subjects (P < 0.001). Plasma SID fell after EB1 and remained reduced throughout the remainder of the test (P < 0.001), mainly due to the rise in plasma lactate, with no group differences. After training, SID was higher (P = 0.001) in both groups (Fig. 1B). SID was greater in type 1 diabetic subjects than control subjects across all times and both days (P < 0.05) but was within the normal range. The dramatic rises in plasma [H+] and lactate during HIE (P < 0.001) (Figs. 1C and D) were markedly attenuated after training (P < 0.001), with no group differences. After training, bicarbonate fell less (P < 0.001) (Fig. 1E) in both groups. Bicarbonate was greater (P < 0.05) and chloride lesser (P < 0.01) in type 1 diabetic subjects than control subjects across all times and both days, but both were within the normal range. PO2 did not differ between days or groups. After training, PCO2 returned more rapidly toward resting values during recovery (P < 0.01), with no group differences. PCO2 was greater across both days and all times in type 1 diabetic subjects than in control subjects (P < 0.01); however, resting values were within the normal range.
This is the first study to examine the effects of intermittent HIE and training on glycemia and acid-base regulation in type 1 diabetes. Hyperglycemia during and after HIE in type 1 diabetes was likely due to a lack of physiological hyperinsulinemia (10). Interestingly, based on findings in rodent muscle (18), the high plasma lactate in both groups may have induced acute insulin resistance. This may have further contributed to the hyperglycemia in type 1 diabetes and likely explains the lack of fall in plasma glucose during recovery in control subjects, despite high insulin. After training, lower plasma glucose with similar insulin suggests less acute insulin resistance, improved clearance, and/or lower catecholamine stimulation. Plasma lactate was considerably lower after training, which may have lessened any acutely induced insulin resistance. This, and effects of HIE training on GLUT4 content and catecholamines during repeated HIE in type 1 diabetes, remains to be investigated. Plasma acid-base status during HIE depends primarily on the SID and PCO2; reduced SID and increased PCO2 will increase [H+] and reduce bicarbonate (19,20). Less acid-base perturbation after training is consistent with the higher SID, due mainly to less rise in lactate, which is perhaps consequent to greater skeletal muscle oxidative metabolism (5). Plasma PCO2, SID, and bicarbonate were greater and chloride lesser in type 1 diabetic subjects than in control subjects (though within normal range), while plasma [H+] did not differ between groups. The mechanism of greater PCO2 in type 1 diabetic subjects cannot be determined from this study; however, higher PCO2 may have induced chloride movement into cells via the chloride/bicarbonate exchange (20). This is consistent with lower plasma chloride and hence greater SID in type 1 diabetic subjects, which likely explains the similar acidosis between groups. HIE training did not improve A1C (however, this may reflect a type II error) but did improve glycemia and acid-base regulation during intermittent HIE in patients with type 1 diabetes.
We are very appreciative of the dedication and efforts of our subjects. We are grateful to Dr. Grace Bryant and Associate Professor Martin Thompson for blood sampling, as well as Kuet Li and Donna Wilks (Garvan Institute of Medical Research) and Nadine Mackay (The University of Sydney) for excellent technical assistance.
Published ahead of print at http://care.diabetesjournals.org on 26 February 2007. DOI: 10.2337/dc06-1790. A table elsewhere in this issue shows conventional and Système International (SI) units and conversion factors for many substances. The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact. Received for publication August 23, 2006. Accepted for publication February 12, 2007.
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||