|
 |
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
DOI: 10.2337/dc07-0238
© 2007 by the American Diabetes Association
Online Letters: Comments and Responses |
Diabetes Reporting as a Cause of Death: Results from the Translating Research Into Action for Diabetes (TRIAD) Study
Response to McEwen et al.
1 Institute of Public Health, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
2 Institute of Preventive Medicine, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
3 Mortality Statistics Branch, Division of Vital Statistics, National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, Maryland
4 Department of Internal Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
Address correspondence to Dr. Chien-Ning Huang, Department of Internal Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, No. 110, Section 1, Chien Kuo North Road, Taichung, 402, Taiwan. E-mail: cshy049{at}csh.org.tw
McEwen et al. (1) conclude that diabetes is much more likely to be reported on the death certificates of diabetic individuals who die of cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). They calculated the odds of recording diabetes anywhere on the death certificate by underlying cause of death (UCOD) and concluded that if the UCOD was CVD, the certifying physician was more likely to report diabetes on the death certificate and that if the UCOD was cancer, the certifying physician was less likely to report diabetes on the death certificate. Their analysis assumes that the certifying physician is solely responsible for determining the UCOD.
In reality, the final, coded UCOD might not be the same as that indicated by the certifying physician. In cases where certifying physicians report an incorrect sequence of causal relationships between conditions, a series of selection rules determined by the World Health Organization is used to select the UCOD (2). In example 1, diabetes was the intended UCOD of the certifying physician. He/she, however, incorrectly reported asthma above diabetes in the sequence. According to selection rule 1, asthma would be selected as the UCOD because asthma is not allowed to be due to diabetes.
Example 1:
a) acute myocardial infarction
b) asthma
c) diabetes
In contrast, in example 2, acute myocardial infarction (AMI) was the intended UCOD of the certifying physician. He/she, however, incorrectly reported diabetes above AMI in the sequence. According to selection rule 2, diabetes would be selected as the UCOD because diabetes cannot be due to AMI.
Example 2:
a) diabetes
b) AMI
We published a recent study indicating that of those deaths in which diabetes was reported in Part I of the death certificates in the U.S., 28% had incorrect causal sequences reported by the certifying physicians (3). As a result, we argue that it is not appropriate to use the final, coded UCOD to retrospectively predict the certification practices of physicians with regard to diabetes.
References
- McEwen LN, Kim C, Haan M, Ghosh D, Lantz PM, Mangione CM, Safford MM, Marrero D, Thompson TJ, Herman WH, TRIAD Study Group: Diabetes reporting as a cause of death: results from the Translating Research Into Action for Diabetes (TRIAD) study. Diabetes Care 29:247–253, 2006
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - World Health Organization: International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems. 10th rev. Geneva, World Health Organization, 1992
- Lu TH, Hsu PY, Bjorkenstam C, Anderson RN: Certifying diabetes-related cause-of-death: a comparison of inappropriate certification statements in Sweden, Taiwan and the USA. Diabetologia 49:2878–2881, 2006[Medline]
CiteULike 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Reddit 
Technorati What's this?
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Diabetes | Diabetes Care | Clinical Diabetes | Diabetes Spectrum |