DOI: 10.2337/dc07-s217 © 2007 by the American Diabetes Association
Pharmacological Management of Gestational DiabetesAn overviewFrom the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brown Medical School, and the Women & Infants Hospital of Rhode Island, Providence, Rhode Island Address correspondence and reprint requests to Donald R. Coustan, Chace/Joukowsky Professor and Chair, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brown Medical School, Obstetrician and Gynecologist in Chief, Women & Infants Hospital of Rhode Island, 101 Dudley St., Providence, RI 02905-2401 E-mail: dcoustan{at}wihri.org
OBJECTIVETo provide a review of the background literature regarding the pharmacological management of gestational diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODSThis is a literature review. RESULTSInformation is available regarding the use of some, but not all, oral antidiabetes agents in pregnancy. CONCLUSIONSAvailable evidence supports the use of glyburide during pregnancy. Evidence is inadequate to support or refute the use of metformin, an agent that has been shown to cross the placenta and thus could be helpful or harmful to the developing fetus.
Because insulin preparations tested to date have been determined not to cross the placenta or to cross minimally, insulin has been the treatment of choice in most parts of the world for patients with gestational diabetes whose circulating glucose levels exceed predetermined thresholds. Although advances have been made in developing insulins that may be administered by alternative routes, insulin is typically injected subcutaneously. This poses a barrier to utilization and has been one of the factors that kindled interest over many years in treating gestational diabetes with oral antidiabetic agents. This and the following presentations describe oral agents that have the potential to be used as alternatives to insulin for the treatment of gestational diabetes. In this overview, I shall outline some guiding principles in determining whether a particular agent is appropriate for use in pregnancy and then apply these principles to the most commonly used oral antidiabetes agents.
As our understanding of the physiology and pharmacology of both pregnancy and diabetes has increased, some guiding principles have emerged to help us decide which medications are safe and effective for pregnant women. Any medication must, of course, be safe for the person who takes it, or at least the benefits of its use must outweigh the risks. However, when a pregnant woman takes a medication, we are also concerned about that medication's effects on her unborn fetus. Starting with the thalidomide experience in the 1960s, our view of the placenta has shifted from that of a barrier, serving to protect the fetus from harm, to that of a sieve, allowing entry of all kinds of chemicals and substances to the fetal circulation. Whereas neither point of view is entirely accurate, the latter is probably a safer perspective. Thus, the first question one should ask about a medication to be used by pregnant women is whether it crosses the placenta. If it does not, then presumably the fetus is relatively protected from any direct effects. An example of such a medication would be heparin, which as a relatively large and highly charged molecule, does not traverse the placenta to any measurable extent. Heparin is generally considered to be safe for the fetus, although of course it poses significant risks such as hemorrhage and bone demineralization for the mother. If a medication is shown to cross the placenta, that is not necessarily a contraindication to its use in pregnancy. For example, we frequently prescribe dexamethasone or betamethasone to pregnant women to take advantage of transplacental passage of these drugs, to enhance fetal lung maturation. The second question is whether a medication that reaches the fetal compartment is neutral, helpful, or harmful to the fetus. The second safety question above also touches on the subject of efficacy. If a drug crosses the placenta and is helpful to the fetus without causing harm, it could then be considered to be both safe and efficacious. Most often, a drug is prescribed during pregnancy to help the mother. The first efficacy question is whether the drug has been shown to help the condition for which the mother is being treated. If the mother has diabetes, and we are considering oral antidiabetic drugs, the answer would generally be yes. However, this will not always be the case. A medication whose mechanism of action is to stimulate pancreatic insulin secretion and/or release would not be helpful to a mother with type 1 diabetes. There are situations where treating the mother's condition will also help the fetus indirectly. The second efficacy question is whether the drug's effect on the mother will be beneficial, and not harmful, to the fetus. In keeping with the Pedersen Hypothesis, any medication that tends to normalize maternal glycemic levels should benefit the fetus as well. The third efficacy question is whether the drug crosses the placenta and has a direct benefit to the fetus. It is my view that all of these questions should be considered in making a decision regarding treatment of gestational diabetes with oral antidiabetes agents.
Oral antidiabetes agents are typically classified as insulin secretagogues, insulin sensitizers, and -glucosidase inhibitors. Recently, a glucagon-like peptide 1 agonist has also been placed on the market.
Insulin secretagogues Meglitinides are structurally different from sulfonylureas, but act similarly via a different receptor. The meglitinides that are currently marketed are nateglinide (Starlix) and repaglinide (Prandin).
If insulin secretagogues cross the placenta, they would be expected to stimulate insulin production in the fetus. Presumably this would make diabetic fetopathy worse, even if circulating glucose levels were lowered. In one study (1), which measured tolbutamide levels in mothers taking tolbutamide as well as their newborns, drug concentrations in placental samples and in neonatal blood samples obtained
Insulin sensitizers The biguanides enhance insulin action, stimulating glucose uptake in the liver and in the periphery and also suppressing hepatic glucose output. They only work when insulin is present, do not stimulate insulin secretion or release, and do not cause hypoglycemia. They are used for patients with type 2 diabetes who have residual ß-cell function, typically when diet and exercise are insufficient for diabetic control. They are also useful in the insulin resistance syndrome and constitute an increasingly popular treatment for polycystic ovarian syndrome, often inducing ovulation and resulting in pregnancy. Phenformin was the original biguanide but was removed from the market in the 1960s because of reports of fatal lactic acidosis. Metformin (Glucophage) is the only biguanide currently available in the U.S. Metformin is a relatively small molecule with a molecular weight of 105.03. If it were to cross the placenta, it might be expected to enhance the action of fetal insulin, which could be beneficial or deleterious to the fetus, depending on which insulin effects are potentiated. According to the package insert (7), metformin is Pregnancy Category B. The manufacturer also states, "Determination of fetal concentrations demonstrated a partial placental barrier to metformin." In conversations with officials at Bristol-Myers Squibb, the manufacturer, I have been unable to obtain the data supporting the latter statement. However, Hague et al. (8) measured plasma metformin levels in seven women taking metformin at a median daily dose of 2,000 mg and in the cord blood of 23 babies whose mothers took metformin during pregnancy. Median plasma metformin levels were 1.05 µg/ml (range 0.062.93) in maternal blood and 0.63 µg/ml (range 0.082.55) in cord blood samples. These data suggest that significant amounts of metformin can cross the placenta, with fetal concentrations in the range of half of maternal concentrations. Because it is unknown whether metformin is therapeutic or deleterious to the fetus, it would seem prudent to obtain further data (perhaps from animal models) before metformin becomes commonly prescribed during pregnancy. At the very least, patients taking metformin should be counseled about the unknown risks and benefits for the fetus.
The thiazolidinediones are agonists for the peroxisome proliferatoractivated receptor-
Exenatide
Available data including poor transplacental passage support the use of an insulin secretagogue, glyburide, to treat gestational diabetes. The widespread use of metformin should await the demonstration of safety for the fetus, since fetal levels are approximately half of maternal levels. Acarbose may be a worthwhile approach if the published preliminary data from a randomized trial are confirmed in the final report and if the issue of gastrointestinal disturbance can be overcome. Given the available evidence regarding placental transfer, and the lack of data from pregnancy, thiazolidinediones should not be used until more information is available. Incretin mimetics do not yet show promise for use in gestational diabetes.
This work was presented at the Fifth International Workshop-Conference on Gestational Diabetes, Chicago, IL, 1113 November 2005.
This article is based on a presentation at a symposium. The symposium and the publication of this article were made possible by an unrestricted educational grant from LifeScan, Inc., a Johnson & Johnson company. A table elsewhere in this issue shows conventional and Système International (SI) units and conversion factors for many substances. Received for publication March 28, 2006. Accepted for publication June 14, 2006.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||