Diabetes Care
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Diabetes Care Publish Ahead of Print published online ahead of print March 23, 2007
DOI: 10.2337/dc06-1598

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Online-Only Appendix
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
dc06-1598v1
30/6/1412    most recent
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vega-López, S.
Right arrow Articles by Lichtenstein, A. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vega-López, S.
Right arrow Articles by Lichtenstein, A. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Original Research

Inter-Individual Variability and Intra-Individual Reproducibility of Glycemic Index Values for Commercial White Bread

Sonia Vega-López, PhD1, Lynne M. Ausman, DSc1, John L. Griffith, PhD2 and Alice H. Lichtenstein, DSc1

1Cardiovascular Nutrition Laboratory, Jean Mayer USDA Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging at Tufts University, Boston, MA
2Biostatistics Research Center, Tufts New England Medical Center, Boston, MA

alice.lichtenstein{at}tufts.edu

ABSTRACT

Objective:: To assess the inter- and intra-individual variability of GI value determinations for white bread using glucose as the reference food.

Research design and methods:: Twenty-three healthy adults (20-70 y) completed up to three sets of two visits per set. Each pair of visits assessed the glycemic response to 50 g available carbohydrates from commercial white bread and glucose, administered in random order. GI values were calculated by dividing the 2-h incremental area under the serum glucose response curve (AUC) after each commercial white bread challenge by the mean AUC for glucose.

Results:: The mean ratio of the AUC after white bread intake by the AUC after glucose intake for the first set of determinations was 78±15 (mean±SEM; N=23; CV=94%). When using GI values calculated with the subset of participants who completed three sets of tests (n=14), GI values for each of the three sets of determinations were 78±10, 60±5 and 75±10 (mean±SEM), respectively. Coefficients of variation (CV) were 50%, 28% and 50%, respectively. The mean GI value of these three sets was 71±6 (mean±SEM), with a CV of 30%. When an analysis of variance approach was applied to these data the inter-individual coefficient of variation was 17.8% and the intra-individual variation was 42.8%.

Conclusions:: These data suggest that in response to a challenge of white bread relative to glucose, within-individual variability is a greater contributor to overall variability than among-individual variability. Further understanding all the sources of variability would be helpful in better defining the utility of GI values.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Diabetes Diabetes Care Clinical Diabetes Diabetes Spectrum
Copyright © 2007 by the American Diabetes Association.