Diabetes Care
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Diabetes Care Publish Ahead of Print published online ahead of print August 13, 2007
DOI: 10.2337/dc07-0589

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
dc07-0589v1
30/11/2794    most recent
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Riddle, M.
Right arrow Articles by Kolterman, O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Riddle, M.
Right arrow Articles by Kolterman, O.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Original Research

Pramlintide Improved Glycemic Control and Reduced Weight in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Using Basal Insulin

Matthew Riddle, MD1, Juan Frias, MD2, Bei Zhang, MD2, Holly Maier, PhD2, Carl Brown, PhD2, Karen Lutz, PhD2 and Orville Kolterman, MD2

1 Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR
2 Amylin Pharmaceuticals, Inc., San Diego, CA

orville.kolterman{at}amylin.com

ABSTRACT

Objective: Assessment of efficacy and safety of pramlintide in patients with type 2 diabetes suboptimally controlled with basal insulin.

Research Design and Methods: In a 16-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 212 patients using insulin glargine with/without oral antidiabetic agents (OAs) were randomized to addition of pramlintide (60 or 120 µg BID/TID) or placebo. Insulin glargine was adjusted targeting a fasting plasma glucose concentration 70-100 mg/dl. One co-primary endpoint was the change in A1C at Week 16. The other co-primary endpoint was a composite measure of overall diabetes control comprising A1C ≤7.0% or reduction ≥0.5%, mean daily postprandial glucose (PPG) increments ≤40 mg/dl, no increase in body weight, and no severe hypoglycemia. Patients meeting all four conditions at Week 16 achieved this endpoint.

Results: More pramlintide- than placebo-treated patients achieved the composite endpoint (25% vs. 7%, P <0.001). Reductions (mean ± SE) in A1C (–0.70 ± 0.11% vs. –0.36 ± 0.08%, P <0.05) and PPG increments (–24.4 ± 3.6 mg/dl vs. –0.4 ± 3.0 mg/dl, P <0.0001) were greater in pramlintide- vs. placebo-treated patients, respectively. Glycemic improvements were accompanied by progressive weight loss with pramlintide and weight gain with placebo (–1.6 ± 0.3 kg vs. +0.7 ± 0.3 kg, P <0.0001). No treatment-related severe hypoglycemia occurred.

Conclusions: Pramlintide improved multiple glycemic parameters and reduced weight with no increase in hypoglycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes not achieving glycemic targets with basal insulin ± OAs.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
The Diabetes EducatorHome page
S. V. Edelman
Optimizing Diabetes Treatment Using an Amylin Analogue
The Diabetes Educator, January 1, 2008; 34(1_suppl): 4S - 10S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Diabetes Diabetes Care Clinical Diabetes Diabetes Spectrum
Copyright © 2007 by the American Diabetes Association.