Diabetes Care
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Diabetes Care Publish Ahead of Print published online ahead of print November 13, 2007
DOI: 10.2337/dc07-1452

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Online-Only Appendix
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
dc07-1452v1
31/2/353    most recent
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Black, H. R.
Right arrow Articles by Thadani, U.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Black, H. R.
Right arrow Articles by Thadani, U.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Original Research

Metabolic and Clinical Outcomes in Non-Diabetic Individuals with the Metabolic Syndrome Assigned to Chlorthalidone, Amlodipine, or Lisinopril as Initial Treatment for Hypertension: A Report from the ALLHAT Study

Henry R. Black, MD1, Barry Davis, MD, PhD2, Joshua Barzilay, MD3, Chuke Nwachuku, MA, MPH, DrPH4, Charles Baimbridge, MS5, Horia Marginean, MD, MS6, Jackson T. Wright, Jr., MD, PhD7, Jan Basile, MD8, Nathan D. Wong, PhD9, Paul Whelton, MD, MSC10, Richard A. Dart, MD11 and Udho Thadani, MD12

1 Rush Presbyterian-St. Luke's Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois (former); New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York
2 University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston School of Public Health, Houston, Texas (former); Amgen, Thousand Oaks, California
3 Kaiser Permanente of Georgia, Tucker, Georgia
4 National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, Maryland (former); AstraZeneca, Wilmington, Delaware
5 University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston School of Public Health, Houston, Texas
6 University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston School of Public Health, Houston, Texas (former); Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
7 General Clinical Research Center, University Hospitals of Cleveland, Cleveland, Ohio
8 VAMC Charleston, Charleston, South Carolina
9 University of Southern California Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
10Loyola University School of Medicine, Maywood, Illinois
11Marshfield Clinic, Marshfield, Wisconsin
12University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, VAMC, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma

Joshua.barzilay{at}kp.org

ABSTRACT

Objective: Optimal initial antihypertensive drug therapy in persons with the metabolic syndrome (MetS) is unknown.

Research Design and Methods: We conducted a subgroup analysis of the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT) to compare metabolic, cardiovascular (CV), and renal outcomes in individuals assigned to initial hypertension treatment with a thiazide-like diuretic (chlorthalidone [C]), a calcium channel blocker (amlodipine [A]), or an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (lisinopril [L]), in non-diabetic persons with or without MetS.

Results: In participants with MetS, at 4 years of follow up, the incidence of new DM (FG ≥126 mg/dl) was 17.1% for C, 16.0% for A (p= 0.49, C vs. A) and 12.6% for L (p<0.05, L vs. C). For those without MetS, the rate of new DM was 7.7% for C, 4.2% for A and 4.7% for L (p<0.05 for both comparisons). There were no differences in relative risks (RR) for outcomes for A compared with C in those with MetS; in those without MetS there was a higher risk for heart failure (HF) (RR 1.55, 95% CI 1.25–1.35). For L compared with C, C was superior to L in those with MetS with respect to HF (1.31, 1.04–1.64) and combined CV disease (1.19, 1.07–1.32). No significant treatment group-MetS interactions were noted.

Conclusions: Despite a less favorable metabolic profile, thiazide-like diuretic initial therapy for hypertension offers similar, and in some instances possibly superior, CV disease outcomes in older hypertensive adults with MetS, as compared to treatment with CCBs and ACEI.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
K. F. Hilgers and J. F. E. Mann
The choice of antihypertensive therapy in patients with the metabolic syndrome--time to change recommendations?
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., November 1, 2008; 23(11): 3389 - 3391.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DTBHome page
Blood pressure guidelines - where are we now?
DTB, September 1, 2008; 46(9): 65 - 69.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JWatch GeneralHome page
Choice of Antihypertensive Agents for Patients with Metabolic Syndrome: ALLHAT Results
Journal Watch (General), March 11, 2008; 2008(311): 2 - 2.
[Full Text]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
J. T. Wright Jr, S. Harris-Haywood, S. Pressel, J. Barzilay, C. Baimbridge, C. J. Bareis, J. N. Basile, H. R. Black, R. Dart, A. K. Gupta, et al.
Clinical Outcomes by Race in Hypertensive Patients With and Without the Metabolic Syndrome: Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT)
Arch Intern Med, January 28, 2008; 168(2): 207 - 217.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Diabetes Diabetes Care Clinical Diabetes Diabetes Spectrum
Copyright © 2007 by the American Diabetes Association.