Diabetes Care
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Diabetes Care Publish Ahead of Print published online ahead of print October 12, 2007
DOI: 10.2337/dc07-1572

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
dc07-1572v1
31/1/81    most recent
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hoerger, T. J.
Right arrow Articles by Saaddine, J. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hoerger, T. J.
Right arrow Articles by Saaddine, J. B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Original Research

Is Glycemic Control Improving in U.S. Adults?

Thomas J. Hoerger, PhD1, Joel E. Segel, BA1, Edward W. Gregg, PhD2 and Jinan B. Saaddine, MD2

1RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC
2Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA

tjh{at}rti.org

ABSTRACT

Objective: To examine whether glycemic control has improved in recent years among persons with diagnosed diabetes.

Research Design and Methods: We examined trends in A1c levels for adults with diagnosed diabetes using three consecutive waves of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES): 1999–2000, 2001–2002, and 2003–2004. We estimated mean A1c levels and the proportion with A1c less than 7.0%, 8.0%, and 9.0%. We used multivariate regression to test whether A1c levels differed by NHANES wave after controlling for other factors. Multivariate dichotomous logistic regression and predictive margins were used to test whether the percentages of persons with diabetes in selected A1c intervals differed by NHANES wave.

Results: Mean A1c levels among persons with diagnosed diabetes declined from 7.82% in 1999–2000 to 7.47% and 7.18% in 2001–2002 and 2003–2004, respectively. After controlling for demographics and diabetes duration, A1c levels were 0.308 (P = 0.20) and 0.511 (P = 0.03) percentage points lower in 2001-2002 and 2003–2004, respectively, than in 1999–2000. The logistic results indicated corresponding improvements over time: the predictive margin for having A1c < 7.0% increased from 37.0% in 1999–2000 to 49.7% in 2001–2002 and 55.7% in 2003–2004.

Conclusions: Glycemic control improved between 1999 and 2004. This trend may represent an important improvement in diabetes care and is encouraging for future reduction of diabetes-related complications.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
K. E. Bainbridge, C. C. Cowie, K. F. Rust, and J. E. Fradkin
Mitigating Case Mix Factors by Choice of Glycemic Control Performance Measure Threshold
Diabetes Care, September 1, 2008; 31(9): 1754 - 1760.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The Diabetes EducatorHome page
S. V. Joy
Clinical Pearls and Strategies to Optimize Patient Outcomes
The Diabetes Educator, May 1, 2008; 34(Supplement_3): 54S - 59S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
J. Fradkin and G. P. Rodgers
The Economic Imperative to Conquer Diabetes
Diabetes Care, March 1, 2008; 31(3): 624 - 625.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Diabetes Diabetes Care Clinical Diabetes Diabetes Spectrum
Copyright © 2007 by the American Diabetes Association.