Diabetes Care
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Diabetes Care Publish Ahead of Print published online ahead of print October 31, 2007
DOI: 10.2337/dc07-1794

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
dc07-1794v1
31/2/316    most recent
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lavery, L. A.
Right arrow Articles by Lavery, D. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lavery, L. A.
Right arrow Articles by Lavery, D. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Original Research

Does Anodyne Light Therapy Improve Peripheral Neuropathy in Diabetes? A Double Blind, Sham Controlled Randomized Trial to Evaluate Monochromatic Infrared Photo Energy

Lawrence A. Lavery, DPM, MPH1, Douglas P. Murdoch, MD1, Jayme Williams, MD1 and David C. Lavery, MD1

1 Department of Surgery, Texas A&M University Health and Science, Center College of Medicine, Scott and White Hospital, Temple, TX, USA

ABSTRACT

Objective: To determine the efficacy of Anodyne Monochromatic Infrared Photo Energy (MIRE) in-home treatments over a 90-day period to improve peripheral sensation and self-reported quality of life in persons with diabetes mellitus.

Methods: This was a double blinded randomized, sham controlled clinical trail. We randomized 69 persons with diabetes and vibration perception threshold between 20-45 volts into two treatment groups. Patients were randomly assigned to active or sham treatment groups. Sixty patients (120 limbs) completed the study. Anodyne units were used at home every day for 40 minutes for 90 days. We evaluated nerve conduction velocities, vibration perception threshold, Semmes Weinstein Monofilaments (SWM) (4, 10, 26, and 60 gram monofilaments), the Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument (MNSI), 10 cm visual analog pain scale, and the Neuropathy Quality of Life Instrument. We used a nested repeated measures MANOVA design. Two sites (great toe and fifth metatarsal) were tested on both the left and right feet of each patient, so, two feet were nested within each patient, and two sites were nested within each foot. To analyze the ordinal SWM scores, we used a nonparametric factorial analysis for longitudinal data.

Results: There were no significant differences in measures for quality of life, Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument, VPT, SWM, or NCV's in active or sham treatment groups (p>0.05).

Summary: Anodyne MIRE therapy was no more effective than sham therapy in the treatment of sensory neuropathy in persons with diabetes.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JWatch GeneralHome page
"Anodyne Therapy" for Diabetic Neuropathy -- No Benefit
Journal Watch (General), March 6, 2008; 2008(306): 2 - 2.
[Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Diabetes Diabetes Care Clinical Diabetes Diabetes Spectrum
Copyright © 2007 by the American Diabetes Association.