Influencing the Attitudes of Medical Students Toward Diabetes: Results of a controlled study
- Robert M Anderson, EDD,
- Michael B Donnelly, PHD,
- Daniel W Gorenflo, PHD,
- Martha M Funnell, MS, RN, CDE and
- Kent J Sheets
- Department of Postgraduate Medicine/Health Professions Education Michigan Diabetes Research and Training Center, Department of Family Practice, University of Michigan Medical School Ann Arbor, Michigan Department of Surgery, University of Kentucky College of Medicine Lexington, Kentucky
- Address Correspondence and Reprint Requests to Robert M. Anderson, EDD, The University of Michigan Medical School, The Towsley Center, Room 1116, Box 0201, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0201.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the effect of two educational interventions on the diabetes-related attitudes of medical students.
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS We studied 67 junior and senior medical students who were participating in the University of Michigan Medical School's Family Practice elective clerkship. Students were assigned to one of two interventions. The first was a 1-wk living-with-diabetes behavioral simulation that involved injections, blood glucose monitoring, diet, exercise, and record keeping. The second intervention involved reading an autobiography about living with diabetes and viewing a videotape about the psychosocial impact of diabetes.
RESULTS No differential impact was found between the two interventions. However, both interventions were followed by a modest positive change in the attitudes of the medical students (which were very positive to begin with) toward the importance of patient autonomy and the value of the team approach to diabetes care. The attitude gains persisted at follow-up for patient autonomy but returned to baseline for team care.
CONCLUSIONS This study suggests that these two educational interventions resulted in modest increases in the already positive attitudes of medical students toward the importance of patient autonomy and team care in diabetes. However, because the study did not include a group that received no treatment, we cannot be certain on this point. The attitude gain related to team care did not persist at follow-up. These findings are consistent with classical attitude research, which suggests that attitudes are sensitive to influences such as these interventions, but that attitude changes may not persist when those influences are changed or withdrawn. We were not able to find a differential impact between the two interventions and suspect that the general nature of the DAS used as the dependent measure may not have been sensitive enough to capture such a differential impact.
- Received December 4, 1991.
- Revision received October 29, 1992.
- Accepted October 29, 1992.
- Copyright © 1993 by the American Diabetes Association











