Advertisement

Improved Postprandial Metabolic Control After Subcutaneous Injection of a Short-Acting Insulin Analog in IDDM of Short Duration With Residual Pancreatic β-Cell Function

  1. Simone Pampanelli, MD,
  2. Elisabetta Torlone, MD,
  3. Carlo Ialli, MD,
  4. Paola Del Sindaco, MD,
  5. Marco Ciofetta, MD,
  6. Mauro Lepore, MD,
  7. Linda Bartocci, MD,
  8. Paolo Brunetti, MD and
  9. Geremia B Bolli, MD
  1. Dipartimento di Medicina Interna e Scienze Endocrine e Metaboliche, Universita di Perugia Perugia, Italy
  1. Address correspondence and reprint requests to Geremia B. Bolli, MD, DIMISEM, Via E. Dal Pozzo, 06126 Perugia, Italy.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To compare postprandial metabolic control after subcutaneous injection of a short-acting insulin analog [Lys(B289),Pro(B29)] (Lispro) or human regular insulin (Humulin R U-100 [Hum-R]) in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) of short duration with residual β-cell function.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Six IDDM patients (age 25 ± 2 years, diabetes duration 14 ± 2 months, HbA1c 6.4 ± 0.5%) with residual pancreatic β-cell function (fasting plasma C-peptide 0.19 ± 0.02 nmol/l) were studied on three different occasions. Postbreakfast plasma glucose was maintained at ∼ 7.1 mmol/l by means of intravenous insulin until either 1200 when 0.1 U/kg Hum-R was injected or until 1225 when 0.1 U/kg of either Hum-R or Lispro was injected subcutaneously. Lunch (mixed meal, 692 Kcal) was served at 1230 (0 min). Six nondiabetic control subjects were also studied.

RESULTS After Lispro administration, the 120-min plasma glucose decreased more (6.1 ± 0.3 mmol/l) than after injection of Hum-R at −30 min (7.7 ± 0.3 mmol/l) or −5 min (9.9 ± 0.2 mmol/l). By the end of the study, plasma glucose was still lower after Lispro was injected (6.7 ± 0.3 mmol/l) than after Hum-R was injected at −30 min (7.6 ± 0.3 mmol/l) or −5 min (7.3 ± 0.2 mmol/l) (P < 0.05). Two IDDM patients required glucose to prevent hypoglycemia after being injected with Lispro, but four required glucose after being injected with Hum-R at −5 min (Lispro ∼ 27 mmol glucose infused between 90 and 240 min; Hum-R ∼ 80 mmol between 240 and 390 min). After Lispro, plasma insulin peaked earlier (at 30 min, 342 ± 29 pmol/l) than after Hum-R injection at −30 min (at 90 min, 198 ± 28 pmol/l) and was superimposable on that of nondiabetic subjects. In Hum-R injected at −5 min, plasma insulin peaked later (at 120 min) and subsequently remained > in the two other studies.

CONCLUSIONS Despite the lack of a time interval between injection and meal, Lispro controls postprandial plasma glucose concentration better than Hum-R given 30 min before meals and, to an even greater extent, better than Hum-R given 5 min before meals. In addition, Lispro minimizes the risk of postprandial hypoglycemia, thus closely mimicking the postprandial glucose homeostasis of nondiabetic subjects. IDDM patients with residual pancreatic β-cell function are the ideal candidates for prandial use of Lispro because they can maintain near-normoglycemia longer after subcutaneous analog injection because of residual endogenous insulin secretion.

  • Received May 21, 1995.
  • Revision received July 13, 1995.
  • Accepted July 13, 1995.
| Table of Contents
Advertisement