Advertisement

Pregnancy Outcomes in Women Without Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Related to the Maternal Glucose Level: Is there a continuum of risk?

  1. Robert G Moses, MD and
  2. Dennis Calvert, PHD
  1. Illawarra Area Health Service and the University of Wollongong Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia
  1. Address correspondence and reprint requests to R.G. Moses, FRACP, 4/393 Crown St., Wollongong, New South Wales 2500, Australia.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To examine selected pregnancy outcomes in women without gestational diabetes mellitus to see whether there was a continuum of risk related to the maternal glucose level.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Consecutive women attending two prenatal clinics and three obstetricians in private practice were tested for GDM at the beginning of the third trimester using a 75-g glucose load in the fasting state. The rate of induction, the number of assisted deliveries, the presence of pregnancy-induced hypertension, fetal birth weights, and morbidity were examined with respect to the maternal 2-h glucose level.

RESULTS Data were available for 1,441 women with a 2-h glucose level < 8.0 mmol/l (144 mg/dl). For each 1.0 mmol/l (18 mg/dl) increase in the glucose level, the odds in favor of an assisted delivery increased by 15.2%, and the odds in favor of the baby being admitted to a special care nursery (SCN) increased by 22.6%. There was no significant association between maternal glucose levels and the probability of either pregnancy-induced hypertension or a large-for-gestational-age (LGA) baby after adjustment for other variables.

CONCLUSIONS In normal women there is a continuum of risk related to the maternal glucose level 2 h after a glucose tolerance test for the probability of having an assisted delivery and the likelihood of the baby being admitted to an SCN. The chance of having pregnancy-induced hypertension or a LGA baby also increased as the maternal glucose level increased but could be largely explained by an increasing body mass index.

  • Received May 24, 1995.
  • Revision received August 3, 1995.
  • Accepted August 3, 1995.
| Table of Contents
Advertisement