Advertisement

Features of Syndrome X in First-Degree Relatives of NIDDM Patients

  1. Murray W Stewart, MRCP,
  2. David B Humphriss, MRCP,
  3. Taher S Berrish, MMEDSCI,
  4. Luis A Barriocanal, MD,
  5. Laura R Trajano, MD,
  6. K George M M Alberti, DPHIL and
  7. Mark Walker, MD
  1. Department of Medicine, University of Newcastle upon Tyne U.K.
  1. Address correspondence and reprint requests to M. Stewart, MRCP, Department of Medicine, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Framlington Place, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4HH, U.K.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To determine whether the features of syndrome × are more common in first-degree relatives of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) patients than in control subjects with no family history of diabetes.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS A total of 154 first-degree relatives from 60 families with two or more NIDDM patients and 154 age- and sex-matched control subjects were studied. All subjects underwent a 75-g oral glucose tolerance test and baseline lipid blood and anthropometric measures. The features of syndrome × that were studied were obesity, hypertension, dyslipidemia (high triglyceride levels and low high-density lipoprotein [HDL] cholesterol concentrations), impaired glucose tolerance (World Health Organization criteria), and insulin resistance (as assessed by the homeostasis model assessment).

RESULTS Relatives were heavier than control subjects (body mass index 27.5 ± 5.2 vs. 25.2 ± 4.6 kg/m2, respectively [mean ± SD], P < 0.0002), had lower HDL cholesterol concentrations (1.2 ± 0.3 vs. 1.4 ± 0.4 mmol/l, P < 0.001), were more insulin-resistant (2.3 [0.7−7.6] vs. 1.6 [0.5−5.1], geometric mean [95% confidence intervals], P < 0.0001), and had more individuals classified as having impaired glucose tolerance (28 of 154 [18%] vs. 7 of 154 [7%], χ 2, P < 0.001). The differences in insulin resistance and HDL cholesterol concentrations between the groups were independent of obesity.

CONCLUSIONS Features of syndrome X occur more frequently in relatives of NIDDM patients than in control subjects with no family history of diabetes.

  • Received November 8, 1994.
  • Revision received March 30, 1995.
  • Accepted March 30, 1995.
| Table of Contents
Advertisement