Acute Effects of Intraperitoneal Versus Subcutaneous Insulin Delivery on Glucose Homeostasis in Patients With NIDDM
- David E Kelley, MD,
- Robert R Henry, MD,
- Steven V Edelman, MD and
- The Veterans Affairs Implantable Insulin Pump Study Group
- Pittsburgh Veterans Affairs Medical Center and the Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, University of California San Diego, California
- Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; and the San Diego Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, California
- Address correspondence and reprint requests to David E. Kelley, MD, El 140 Biomedical Science Tower, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261. E-mail: kelley{at}novell1.dept-med.pitt.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of this study is to compare the effect of intraperitoneal versus subcutaneous insulin injection on hepatic glucose production (HGP) and systemic glucose utilization (Rd) in patients with NIDDM.
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Eight male volunteers with NIDDM, each of whom had a programmable-rate, implantable insulin pump, were given an injection of insulin (0.15 units/kg body wt) by intraperitoneal or subcutaneous injection on separate days in randomized order. Plasma glucose was kept constant for 5 h using the glucose clamp technique, and HGP and Rd were measured using isotope dilution.
RESULTS Intraperitoneal insulin injection resulted in higher and earlier peak systemic insulin concentrations (1,469 ± 245 vs. 454 ± 48 pmol/l, P < 0.01). Glucose Rd doubled within 1 h after intraperitoneal injection and was greater than that attained with subcutaneous injection (3.91 ± 0.27 vs. 2.60 ± 0.19 mg · kg−1 · min−1, P < 0.01). Intraperitoneal and subcutaneous injections suppressed HGP and plasma free fatty acid to a similar extent during the first 3 h, effects that persisted through 5 h after subcutaneous insulin injection but waned 3–4 h after intraperitoneal injection.
CONCLUSIONS In patients with NIDDM, intraperitoneal insulin injection achieves more rapid and greater peak values for stimulation of glucose Rd than subcutaneous insulin injection. With regard to HGP and lipolysis, intraperitoneal and subcutaneous injections achieve similar initial suppression but this is maintained for a more limited duration with intraperitoneal as compared with subcutaneous injection. These differences in insulin action seem directly related to the rapidity of insulin absorption with intraperitoneal injection.
- Received November 10, 1995.
- Revision received June 27, 1996.
- Accepted June 27, 1996.
- Copyright © 1996 by the American Diabetes Association











