Advertisement

An Intervention for Enhancing Compliance With Screening Recommendations for Diabetic Retinopathy: A bicoastal experience

  1. Antonio P Legorreta, MD, MPH,
  2. Malik M Hasan, MD,
  3. Anne L Peters, MD,
  4. Kenneth R Pelletier, PHD, MD and
  5. Kwan-Moon Leung, PHD
  1. Quality Initiatives Division Stanford University School of Medicine Stanford, California
  2. Health Net, Woodland Hills, California Department of Community Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine Stanford, California
  3. Mount Sinai School of Medicine New York, New York Division of Endocrinology and Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine Stanford, California
  4. Department of Biostatistics, Stanford University School of Medicine Stanford, California
  5. University of California Los Angeles Los Angeles; and the Stanford Corporate Health Program Stanford University School of Medicine Stanford, California
  1. Address correspondence and reprint requests to Antonio P Legorreta, MD, Vice President, Quality Initiatives, Health Net, 21600 Oxnard Street, 11th Floor, Woodland Hills, CA 91367.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To determine whether an intervention at both the provider and patient level can increase the utilization of diabetic retinal examination among diabetic patients and to compare the results from a comparable study conducted on the East Coast.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS For the regional intervention study, all diabetic patients 18 years or older who enrolled in a large network-based health maintenance organization (HMO) in California were identified (n = 19,397). The identified diabetic patients received educational materials and a notification of their prior diabetic retinal examination status. Also, their primary care physicians received the current American Diabetes Association (ADA) guidelines for dilated retinal examinations and a list of patients due for diabetic retinal examination.

RESULTS There were 25 and 27% increases in the percentage of diabetic patients who received diabetic retinal examinations in 1995 compared with the percentages in 1993 and 1994, respectively. The increase in diabetic retinal examinations was most significant after the intervention (odds ratio = 1.4). Furthermore, the improvements in compliance after the intervention were almost identical between the studies implemented on the East and West Coasts.

CONCLUSIONS This study and the prior study demonstrate that such a “reminder” intervention can improve compliance with diabetic retinal screening recommendations. A generalizable intervention, such as this, may be applicable on a national level. For these programs to be successful, however, HMOs and physicians must have a collaborative relationship.

  • Received August 6, 1996.
  • Accepted November 11, 1996.
| Table of Contents
Advertisement