Advertisement

The Oregon Health Plan

Predictors of office-based diabetic quality of care

  1. Malathi Srinivasan, MD,
  2. Michael Przybylski, PHD and
  3. Nancy Swigonski, MD, MPH
  1. From the Departments of Medicine (M.S.) and Pediatrics (N.S.) and the Bowen Research Center (M.P.), Indiana University School of Medicine; and the Regenstrief Institute (M.S.), Indianapolis, Indiana.
  1. Address correspondence and reprint requests to Malathi Srinivasan, MD, Department of Medicine, 1050 Wishard Blvd., Sixth Floor, Indianapolis, IN 46202. E-mail: msriniva{at}iupui.edu .

Abstract

OBJECTIVE— In 1994, the Oregon Health Plan (OHP) expanded basic Medicaid insurance to residents under the federal poverty limit, adopted a prioritized limited benefits package, and converted to managed care. The quality of care in predominantly Medicaid populations with diabetes has not been previously described. In OHP enrollees, we examined predictors of diabetes care based on American Diabetes Association guidelines and described OHP diabetes care compared with national benchmarks.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS— Chart abstraction and Medicaid data for 1995-1996 yielded 996 nonpregnant diabetic patients who were 18-64 years of age. Using HbAlc, lipid panel, and urine protein/microalbumin documentation ordered during the study year, we constructed a standard care (SC) index: SC for all three tests, mixed care (MC) for one to two tests, or no tests documented (NTD).

RESULTS— Our sample was predominantly white, 48 ± 11 years of age, 63% women, with 8 ± 5 provider visits. Providers ordered HbAlc (70%), urine microalbumin/protein (57%), and lipid panel (41%) tests. Patients distributed into SC (22%), MC (62%), or NTD (16%). Thirteen variables predicted SC. Patients had a higher likelihood of SC if they were 18-24 years of age, had more clinic visits, were on insulin daily, were in several comorbid groups, were enrolled in salaried or capitated health plans, or lived in counties with more hospital beds. Four studies were used as comparable national benchmarks.

CONCLUSIONS— Care provided to OHP patients with diabetes compares favorably with national benchmarks. Yet, most OHP patients with diabetes are still not achieving optimal care. Examining predictors of SC may play an important role in further policy development.

Footnotes

  • Abbreviations: ADA, American Diabetes Association; AHRQ, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; ARF, Area Resource File; BP, blood pressure; CADG, Collapsed Ambulatory Diagnosis Group; HCFA, Health Care Financing Administration; ICD-9, International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision; MC, mixed care; MCO, managed care organization; NTD, no tests documented; OHP, Oregon Health Plan; OR, odds ratio; SC, standard care.

  • The statements contained in this article are those of the authors; no endorsement by HCFA should be inferred or implied.

  • A table elsewhere in this issue shows conventional and Système International (SI) units and conversion factors for many substances.

    • Accepted October 19, 2000.
    • Received June 6, 2000.
| Table of Contents
Advertisement