Importance of Early Insulin Secretion

Comparison of nateglinide and glyburide in previously diet-treated patients with type 2 diabetes

  1. Priscilla A. Hollander, MD, PHD1,
  2. Sherwyn L. Schwartz, MD2,
  3. Marjorie R. Gatlin, MD3,
  4. Stephen J. Haas, BS3,
  5. Hongjie Zheng, BS3,
  6. James E. Foley, PHD3 and
  7. Beth E. Dunning, PHD3
  1. 1Ruth Collins Diabetes Center, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
  2. 2Diabetes and Glandular Disease Clinic, San Antonio, Texas
  3. 3Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, New Jersey

    Abstract

    OBJECTIVE—This study compared the effects of nateglinide, glyburide, and placebo on postmeal glucose excursions and insulin secretion in previously diet-treated patients with type 2 diabetes.

    RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter study was conducted in 152 patients who received either nateglinide (120 mg before three meals daily, n = 51), glyburide (5 mg q.d. titrated to 10 mg q.d. after 2 weeks, n = 50), or placebo (n = 51) for 8 weeks. Glucose, insulin, and C-peptide profiles during liquid meal challenges were measured at weeks 0 and 8. At weeks −1 and 7, 19-point daytime glucose and insulin profiles, comprising three solid meals, were measured.

    RESULTS—During the liquid-meal challenge, nateglinide reduced the incremental glucose area under the curve (AUC) more effectively than glyburide (Δ = −4.94 vs. −2.71 mmol · h/l, P < 0.05), whereas glyburide reduced fasting plasma glucose more effectively than nateglinide (Δ = −2.9 vs. −1.0 mmol/l, respectively, P < 0.001). In contrast, C-peptide induced by glyburide was greater than that induced by nateglinide (Δ = +1.83 vs. +0.95 nmol · h/l, P < 0.01), and only glyburide increased fasting insulin levels. During the solid meal challenges, nateglinide and glyburide elicited similar overall glucose control (Δ 12-h incremental AUC = −13.2 vs. −15.3 mmol · h/l), but the insulin AUC induced by nateglinide was significantly less than that induced by glyburide (Δ 12-h AUC = +866 vs. +1,702 pmol · h/l, P = 0.01).

    CONCLUSIONS—This study demonstrated that nateglinide selectively enhanced early insulin release and provided better mealtime glucose control with less total insulin exposure than glyburide.

    Footnotes

    • Address correspondence and reprint requests to Priscilla A. Hollander, MD, PhD, 3600 Gaston Avenue, Dallas, TX 75246. E-mail: priscilh{at}baylordallas.edu.

      Received for publication 8 September 2000 and accepted in revised form 2 January 2001.

      B.E.D. and H.Z. were formerly employed by Novartis Pharmaceuticals; M.J.G., J.E.F., and S.J.H. are currently employed by Novartis Pharmaceuticals. P.A.H. is a member of the advisory panel and has been a speaker and consultant for Novartis Pharmaceuticals. The laboratory in which S.S. works is funded by Abbott, Asta Medica, Merck, Parke-Davis, Pfizer, Sanwa, and Sepracor.

      A table elsewhere in this issue shows conventional and Système International (SI) units and conversion factors for many substances.

    « Previous | Next Article »Table of Contents