Advertisement

Clinically Useful Estimates of Insulin Sensitivity During Pregnancy

Validation studies in women with normal glucose tolerance and gestational diabetes mellitus

  1. John P. Kirwan, PHD12,
  2. Larraine Huston-Presley, MS1,
  3. Satish C. Kalhan, MD3 and
  4. Patrick M. Catalano, MD13
  1. 1Reproductive Biology and
  2. 2Nutrition and the
  3. 3Schwartz Center for Metabolism & Nutrition, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine at MetroHealth Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio

    Abstract

    OBJECTIVE—We examined whether selected indexes of insulin sensitivity derived from an oral glucose tolerance test (ISOGTT) or fasting glucose/insulin levels (ISQUICKI and ISHOMA) can be used to predict insulin sensitivity in women before and during pregnancy.

    RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—A 2-h euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp (5 mmol/l glucose, 40 mU · m−2 · min−1 insulin) and a 120-min oral glucose tolerance test (75 g load pregravid, 100 g pregnant) were repeated on 15 women (10 with normal glucose tolerance [NGT] and 5 with gestational diabetes mellitus [GDM]) pregravid and during both early (12–14 weeks) and late (34–36 weeks) pregnancy. An index of insulin sensitivity derived from the clamp (ISCLAMP) was obtained from glucose infusion rates adjusted for change in fat-free mass and endogenous glucose production measured using [6,6-2H2]glucose.

    RESULTS—Univariate analysis using combined groups and periods of pregnancy resulted in significant correlations between ISCLAMP and ISOGTT (r2 = 0.74, P < 0.0001), ISQUICKI (r2 = 0.64, P < 0.0001), and ISHOMA (r2 = 0.53, P < 0.0001). The ISOGTT provided a significantly better correlation (P < 0.0001) than either ISQUICKI or ISHOMA. Multivariate analysis showed a significant group effect (P < 0.0003) on the prediction model, and separate equations were developed for the NGT (r2 = 0.64, P < 0.0001) and GDM (r2 = 0.85, P < 0.0001) groups. When subdivided by period of pregnancy, the correlation between ISCLAMP and ISOGTT pregravid was r2 = 0.63 (P = 0.0002), during early pregnancy was r2 = 0.80 (P < 0.0001), and during late pregnancy was r2 = 0.64 (P = 0.0002).

    CONCLUSIONS—Estimates of insulin sensitivity from the ISOGTT during pregnancy were significantly better than from fasting glucose and insulin values. However, separate prediction equations are necessary for pregnant women with NGT and women with GDM.

    Footnotes

    • Address correspondence and reprint requests to John P. Kirwan, PhD, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine at MetroHealth Medical Center, Departments of Reproductive Biology and Nutrition, Bell Greve Bldg., Rm G-232E, 2500 MetroHealth Dr., Cleveland, OH 44109-1998. E-mail: jkirwan{at}metrohealth.org.

      Received for publication 29 March 2001 and accepted in revised form 4 June 2001.

      A table elsewhere in this issue shows conventional and Système International (SI) units and conversion factors for many substances.

    | Table of Contents
    Advertisement