Barriers to Blood Glucose Monitoring in a Multiethnic Community

  1. Janice C. Zgibor, PHD1 and
  2. David Simmons, MD, FRACP2
  1. 1Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
  2. 2Department of Rural Health, University of Melbourne, Shepparton, Victoria, Australia

    Abstract

    OBJECTIVE—We studied a multiethnic community to determine factors associated with blood glucose monitoring (BGM) and to determine the independent association between barriers to diabetes care and BGM.

    RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—A total of 323 participants (35.6% European, 32.2% Maori, and 32.2% Pacific Islander) from the South Auckland Diabetes Project (free of major complications by self-report) completed a qualitative survey to determine barriers to diabetes care. Five barriers to diabetes care categories were generated including internal psychological (self efficacy/health beliefs), external psychological (psychosocial environment), internal physical (comorbidities/side effects of treatment), external physical (finance/access to care), and educational (knowledge of diabetes/services) barriers.

    RESULTS—Characteristics associated with BGM greater than or equal to twice weekly were female sex, HbA1c >8%, higher diabetes knowledge scores, and insulin use. Multivariate analyses demonstrated that those reporting external physical barriers (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.26–0.84), external psychological barriers (0.55, 0.30–1.0), and internal psychological barriers (0.56, 0.32–1.0) were less likely to perform BGM independent of ethnicity, insulin use, age, sex, diabetes knowledge, and glycemic control. Further multivariate analyses demonstrated that those reporting external physical barriers, particularly related to personal finance, were less likely to perform BGM.

    CONCLUSIONS—These data demonstrate that patient-reported barriers to diabetes care are associated with BGM, particularly in relation to financial, psychosocial, and self-efficacy issues. Understanding these barriers and overcoming them within the context of the patient’s ethnic environment may lead to increased participation in self-care.

    Footnotes

    • Address correspondence and reprint requests to Professor David Simmons, Department of Rural Health, University of Melbourne, P.O. Box 6500, Shepparton, Victoria 3632, Australia. E-mail: dsimmons{at}unimelb.edu.au.

      Received for publication 17 August 2001, and accepted in revised form 3 July 2002.

      A table elsewhere in this issue shows conventional and Système International (SI) units and conversion factors for many substances.

    « Previous | Next Article »Table of Contents