Projected Impact of Implementing the Results of the Diabetes Prevention Program in the U.S. Population
- Sharon H. Saydah, PHD, MHS1,
- Danita Byrd-Holt1 and
- Maureen I. Harris, PHD, MPH2
- 1Social and Scientific Systems, Silver Spring, Maryland
- 2National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Bethesda, Maryland
Abstract
OBJECTIVE—To determine the feasibility of using either fasting plasma glucose or HbA1c to identify individuals in the U.S. population who meet the Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) criteria for intervention, defined as BMI ≥24 kg/m2, fasting plasma glucose level 96–125 mg/dl, and 2-h glucose level 140–199 mg/dl in an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT).
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—Analysis of a representative sample of U.S. adults aged 40–74 years with no medical history of diabetes for whom data on height, weight, fasting plasma glucose, HbA1c, and 2-h plasma glucose during an OGTT were obtained. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves for fasting glucose and HbA1c were determined.
RESULTS—Using BMI <24 kg/m2 as an initial criterion eliminated 27.2% of U.S. adults from further testing. Of the remaining group, 41.1% did not have to be considered for an OGTT because their fasting glucose level was below or above 96–125 mg/dl. Overall, 10.6% of adults aged 40–74 years without medical history of diabetes met the DPP eligibility criteria for intervention. Among individuals with BMI ≥24 kg/m2 and fasting glucose level 96–125 mg/dl, applying a fasting plasma glucose cutoff of ≥105 mg/dl excluded 62.5% of this group and resulted in 56.0% of those with 2-h glucose level 140–199 mg/dl in this group being identified, with a specificity of 72.0% and a PPV of 17.1%. Similar values were obtained for an HbA1c cutoff value of ≥5.5%.
CONCLUSIONS—Using data on BMI and setting cutoff values for fasting glucose and HbA1c would greatly reduce the number of individuals who would need to undergo an OGTT while achieving adequate sensitivity, specificity, and PPV.
- DPP, Diabetes Prevention Program
- NHANES III, third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey
- OGTT, oral glucose tolerance test
- PPV, positive predictive value
- ROC, receiver operator characteristic
Footnotes
-
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Sharon H. Saydah, 8757 Georgia Ave., 12th Floor, Silver Spring, MD 20910. E-mail: ssaydah{at}s-3.com.
Received for publication 6 February 2002 and accepted in revised form 21 June 2002.
The opinions expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the position of the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases.
A table elsewhere in this issue shows conventional and Système International (SI) units and conversion factors for many substances.
See accompanying editorial on p. 2098.
- DIABETES CARE














