Advertisement

The Continuous Glucose Monitoring System Is Useful for Detecting Unrecognized Hypoglycemias in Patients With Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes but Is Not Better Than Frequent Capillary Glucose Measurements for Improving Metabolic Control

  1. Ana Chico, MD, PHD1,
  2. Pablo Vidal-Ríos, MD, PHD2,
  3. Montserrat Subirà, NP1 and
  4. Anna Novials, MD, PHD1
  1. 1Institute of Diabetology, Fundació Sardà Farriol, Barcelona, Spain
  2. 2Diabetes Center, La Coruña, Spain

    Abstract

    OBJECTIVE—To evaluate whether the continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS; MiniMed, Sylmar, CA) is useful for investigating the incidence of unrecognized hypoglycemias in type 1 and type 2 diabetic patients and for improving metabolic control in type 1 diabetic patients.

    RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—A total of 70 diabetic subjects (40 type 1 and 30 type 2 subjects) were monitored using the CGMS. The number of unrecognized hypoglycemias was registered. Furthermore, the 40 type 1 diabetic patients whose treatment was modified in accordance with the information obtained from the CGMS were compared with a control group of 35 different type 1 diabetic patients using intensive capillary glucose measurements. HbA1c levels were measured before the monitoring period and 3 months later.

    RESULTS—The CGMS detected unrecognized hypoglycemias in 62.5% of the type 1 diabetic patients and in 46.6% of the type 2 diabetic patients. We found that 73.7% of all events occurred at night. HbA1c concentrations decreased significantly in both the group of type 1 diabetic subjects monitored with the CGMS (from 8.3 ± 1.6 to 7.5 ± 1.2%, P < 0.01) and the control group (from 8.0 ± 1.4 to 7.5 ± 0.8%, P < 0.01). The greatest reduction was observed in the subgroup of patients who started continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion therapy, both in the CGMS-monitored and control groups (from 9.4 ± 2 to 7.2 ± 1.4% and from 8.1 ± 1.8 to 7.1 ± 0.6%, respectively).

    CONCLUSIONS—The CGMS is useful for detecting unrecognized hypoglycemias in type 1 and type 2 diabetic subjects; however, it is not better than standard capillary glucose measurements for improving metabolic control of type 1 diabetic subjects, regardless of the therapeutic regimen.

    Footnotes

    • Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Ana Chico, Institute of Diabetology, Fundació Sardà Farriol, Paseo de la Bonanova 69, 6a planta, 08017 Barcelona, Spain. E-mail: 28299acb{at}comb.es.

      Received for publication 12 September 2002 and accepted in revised form 27 December 2002.

      A table elsewhere in this issue shows conventional and Système International (SI) units and conversion factors for many substances.

    | Table of Contents
    Advertisement