Real World Effectiveness of Rosiglitazone Added to Maximal (Tolerated) Doses of Metformin and a Sulphonylurea Agent

Response to Roy et al.

  1. Parijat De, MD, MRCP
  1. From the Department of Diabetes and Endocrinolgy, Diabetes Centre, City Hospital, Birmingham, U.K
  1. Address correspondence to Parijat De, Hilda Lloyd Diabetes Centre, City Hospital, Dudley Road, Birmingham, U.K. B18 7QH. E-mail: parijat.de{at}aol.com

I read with interest the article by Roy et al. (1) regarding the use of triple oral therapy in their minority population. I would like to point out our similar experience in the U.K. with a few take-home messages.

We studied 32 consecutive patients with type 2 diabetes (18 men and 14 women, aged 53 ± 10.6 years [means ± SD], diabetes duration 7.2 ± 5.4 years) in an inner city teaching hospital. Sixteen were South Asians, 8 Afro-Carribeans, and 8 Caucasians. All were on maximal doses of metformin (1,000 mg b.i.d.) and a sulfonylurea (gliclazide, 160 mg b.i.d.) with A1C of 9.20 ± 1.4%.

Our target A1C was also <7.5%, as recommended by the National Institute of Clinical Evidence in the U.K. (2). We used triple oral therapy in all patients, using either 4 mg rosiglitazone (14 patients) or 30 mg pioglitazone (18 patients) in a random fashion. After triple oral therapy, A1C (measured at 4 months) was 8.2 ± 1.6. Thirteen of 32 patients (41%) responded with an A1C <7.5% and remained at this level at 1 year. Nine of these 13 respondents (69%) were South Asians; therefore, this was not surprising given that they are usually more insulin resistant (3). Despite the success of glitazones, the majority of our patients have needed insulin (15 of 19; 4 patients unwilling). Glitazone use was particularly successful in those with a prestart mean A1C of 9.1 (±2.0%), in keeping with suggestions that glitazones work best if used early in the course of the disease process in type 2 diabetes (4).

Thus, our experience in an inner-city ethnic population (where a lot of patients are disinclined to use insulin) is that triple oral therapy can be successful with proper patient selection, but with a precondition that if A1C is not <7.5% after 6 months of use, then the patient will need insulin. We would recommend a trial of triple oral therapy for 1) taxi/heavy goods vehicle drivers (with obvious implications if insulin commenced) and 2) individuals in whom prestart A1C is no higher than 9.0%, particularly in the minority population.

Footnotes

  • P.D. has received honoraria for speaking engagements from GlaxoSmithKline Beecham.

References

« Previous | Next Article »Table of Contents

Navigate This Article