Changes in Insulin Sensitivity in Response to Troglitazone Do Not Differ Between Subjects With and Without the Common, Functional Pro12Ala Peroxisome Proliferator–Activated Receptor-γ2 Gene Variant
Results from the Troglitazone in Prevention of Diabetes (TRIPOD) study
- Soren Snitker, MD, PHD1,
- Richard M. Watanabe, PHD2,
- Ifeanyi Ani, BA1,
- Anny H. Xiang, PHD2,
- Aura Marroquin, RN, BSN2,
- Cesar Ochoa, MD2,
- Jose Goico, MD2,
- Alan R. Shuldiner, MD1 and
- Thomas A. Buchanan, MD2
- 1University of Maryland, Baltimore School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
- 2Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
- Address correspondence and reprint requests to Soren Snitker, MD, PhD, Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Nutrition, University of Maryland, Baltimore School of Medicine, 660 W. Redwood St., Howard Hall Rm. 598-B, Baltimore, MD 21201-1596. E-mail: ssnitker{at}medicine.umaryland.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE—We have tested whether the Pro12Ala variant of the peroxisome proliferator–activated receptor (PPAR)-γ nuclear receptor involved in thiazolidinedione (TZD) action accounted for the failure of troglitazone to increase insulin sensitivity in nondiabetic Hispanic women with previous gestational diabetes treated in the Troglitazone in Prevention of Diabetes (TRIPOD) study.
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—Ninety-three women assigned to troglitazone had intravenous glucose tolerance tests at randomization and after 3 months of treatment with troglitazone, 400 mg/day, and were genotyped for the Pro12Ala variant of the PPAR-γ gene. Subjects were divided into tertiles based on their change in minimal model insulin sensitivity (Si) during the first 3 months of troglitazone treatment.
RESULTS—The mean changes in Si in the bottom, middle, and top tertiles of Si response were −0.21 ± 0.57, 0.91 ± 0.26, and 2.58 ± 1.32 min−1 per μU/ml · 10−4, respectively. Frequencies of the Ala/− genotype were 30, 22, and 26% in the same three tertiles (P = 0.77). Analysis of phenotypes by genotype revealed only small differences between the Pro/Pro and Ala/− groups, respectively, in baseline Si (2.76 ± 0.19 vs. 2.33 ± 0.33 × 10−4 min−1 per μU/ml; P = 0.27), the change in Si after 3 months of troglitazone treatment (1.19 ± 0.17 vs. 0.93 ± 0.30; P = 0.46), and the cumulative incidence of diabetes during a median follow-up of 30 months (13 vs. 17%; P = 0.66).
CONCLUSIONS—Among young Hispanic women at high risk for type 2 diabetes, the Pro12Ala variant of the PPAR-γ receptor gene did not explain the failure of ∼1/3 of subjects to increase their insulin sensitivity when placed on troglitazone at a dose of 400 mg/day.
- PPAR, peroxisome proliferator–activated receptor
- TRIPOD, Troglitazone in Prevention of Diabetes
- TZD, thiazolidinedione
Footnotes
-
A.H.X., J.G., C.O., and A.M. have received grant support from Parke-Davis. T.A.B. has received grant support and served on the advisory board and speakers bureau of Parke-Davis.
S.S. and R.M.W. contributed equally to this work.
A table elsewhere in this issue shows conventional and Système International (SI) units and conversion factors for many substances.
-
- Accepted March 16, 2004.
- Received August 8, 2003.
- DIABETES CARE











