Who Has Diabetes? Best Estimates of Diabetes Prevalence in the Department of Veterans Affairs Based on Computerized Patient Data

  1. Donald R. Miller, SCD12,
  2. Monika M. Safford, MD34 and
  3. Leonard M. Pogach, MD, MBA34
  1. 1Boston University, School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
  2. 2Center for Health Quality, Outcomes, and Economic Research, Bedford, Massachusetts
  3. 3VA New Jersey Health Care System, East Orange, New Jersey
  4. 4University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey
  1. Address correspondence and reprint requests to Donald R. Miller, ScD, Center for Health Quality, Outcomes & Economic Research (CHQOER), Edith Nourse Rogers Memorial Hospital (152), Bldg 70, 200 Springs Rd., Bedford, MA 01730. E-mail: drmiller{at}bu.edu

Abstract

OBJECTIVE—To optimize methods for identifying patients with diabetes based on computerized records and to obtain best estimates of diabetes prevalence in Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) patients.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—The VA Diabetes Epidemiology Cohort (DEpiC) is a linked national database of all VA patients since 1998 with data from VA medical visits, Medicare claims, pharmacy and laboratory records, and patient surveys. Using DEpiC, we examined concordance of diabetes indicators, including ICD-9-CM codes (250.xx), prescription drug treatment, HbA1c tests, and patient self-report. We determined the optimal criterion for identifying diabetes and used it in estimating diabetes prevalence in the VA.

RESULTS—The best criterion was a prescription for a diabetes medication in the current year and/or 2+ diabetes codes from inpatient and/or outpatient visits (VA and Medicare) over a 24-month period. This definition had high sensitivity (93%) and specificity (98%) against patient self-report, and reasonable rates of HbA1c testing (75%). HbA1c testing alone added few additional cases, and a single diagnostic code added many patients, but without confirmation (reduced specificity). However, including codes from Medicare was critical. Applying this definition for 1998–2000, we identified an average of 500,000 VA patients with diabetes per year. We also estimated high and increasing diabetes prevalence rates of 16.7% in FY1998, 18.6% in FY1999, and 19.6% in FY2000 and an incidence estimated to be ∼2% per year.

CONCLUSIONS—Development and evaluation of methodology for analyzing computerized patient data can improve the identification of patients with diabetes. The increasing high prevalence of diabetes in VA patients will present challenges for clinicians and health system management.

Footnotes

  • A table elsewhere in this issue shows conventional and Système International (SI) units and conversion factors for many substances.

    Funding for this supplement was provided by The Seattle Epidemiologic Research and Information Center and the VA Cooperative Studies Program.

    • Accepted July 25, 2003.
    • Received July 1, 2003.
« Previous | Next Article »Table of Contents