Improved Clinical Outcomes Associated With Metformin in Patients With Diabetes and Heart Failure
- Dean T. Eurich, BSP, MSC12,
- Sumit R. Majumdar, MD, MPH13,
- Finlay A. McAlister, MD, MSC13,
- Ross T. Tsuyuki, BSC(PHARM), PHARMD, MSC124 and
- Jeffrey A. Johnson, PHD12
- 1Institute of Health Economics, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
- 2Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
- 3Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
- 4Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
- Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Jeffrey A. Johnson, #1200, 10405 Jasper Ave., Edmonton, AB, Canada T5J 3N4. E-mail: jeff.johnson{at}ualberta.ca
Abstract
OBJECTIVE—Metformin is considered contraindicated in patients with heart failure because of concerns over lactic acidosis, despite increasing evidence of potential benefit. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between metformin and clinical outcomes in patients with heart failure and type 2 diabetes.
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—Using the Saskatchewan Health databases, 12,272 new users of oral antidiabetic agents were identified between the years 1991 and 1996. Subjects with incident heart failure (n = 1,833) were identified through administrative records based on ICD-9 code 428 and grouped according to antidiabetic therapy: metformin monotherapy (n = 208), sulfonylurea monotherapy (n = 773), or combination therapy (n = 852). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess differences in all-cause mortality, all-cause hospitalization, and the combination (i.e., all-cause hospitalization or mortality).
RESULTS—Average age of subjects was 72 years, 57% were male, and average follow-up was 2.5 ± 2.0 (SD) years. Compared with sulfonylurea therapy, fewer deaths occurred in subjects receiving metformin: 404 (52%) for sulfonylurea monotherapy versus 69 (33%) for metformin monotherapy (hazard ratio [HR] 0.70 [95% CI 0.54–0.91]) and 263 (31%) for combination therapy (0.61 [0.52–0.72]). A reduction in deaths or hospitalizations was also observed: 658 (85%) for sulfonylurea monotherapy versus 160 (77%) for metformin monotherapy (0.83 [0.70–0.99]) and 681 (80%) for combination therapy (0.86 [0.77–0.96]). There was no difference in time to first hospitalization between study groups.
CONCLUSIONS—Metformin, alone or in combination, in subjects with heart failure and type 2 diabetes was associated with lower morbidity and mortality compared with sulfonylurea monotherapy.
Footnotes
-
This study is based on unidentifiable data provided by the Saskatchewan Department of Health. The interpretation and conclusions contained herein do not necessarily represent those of the Government of Saskatchewan or the Saskatchewan Department of Health.
A table elsewhere in this issue shows conventional and Système International (SI) units and conversion factors for many substances.
See accompanying editorial, p. 2585.
-
- Accepted May 13, 2005.
- Received April 22, 2005.
- DIABETES CARE














