Hypertension Prevalence, Awareness, Treatment, and Control in an Adult Type 1 Diabetes Population and a Comparable General Population
- David M. Maahs, MD1,
- Gregory L. Kinney, MPH2,
- Paul Wadwa, MD1,
- Janet K. Snell-Bergeon, MPH2,
- Dana Dabelea, MD, PHD2,
- John Hokanson, MPH, PHD2,
- James Ehrlich, MD3,
- Satish Garg, MD1,
- Robert H. Eckel, MD4 and
- Marian J. Rewers, MD, PHD12
- 1Barbara Davis Center for Childhood Diabetes, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, Colorado
- 2Department of Preventive Medicine and Biometrics, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, Colorado
- 3Colorado Heart Imaging, Denver, Colorado
- 4Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, Colorado
- Address correspondence and reprint requests to David M. Maahs, MD, Barbara Davis Center for Childhood Diabetes, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, 4200 East 9th Ave., Denver, CO 80262. Email: david.maahs{at}uchsc.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE—To compare the prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension in a population-representative sample of adults with type 1 diabetes and comparable nondiabetic control subjects.
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—In 2000–2002, the Coronary Artery Calcification in Type 1 Diabetes Study enrolled 1,416 individuals aged 19–56 years with no known history of coronary artery disease: 652 type 1 diabetic patients (46% male, mean age 37 years) and 764 nondiabetic control subjects (50% male, mean age 39 years). Subjects were asked if they had been told by a physician that they had hypertension or were on a blood pressure medication. Blood pressure was measured using standardized Joint National Committee (JNC) protocol.
RESULTS—Type 1 diabetic subjects, compared with nondiabetic subjects, had higher rates of hypertension prevalence (43 vs. 15%, P < 0.001), awareness (53 vs. 45%, P = 0.11), treatment (87 vs. 47%, P < 0.001), and control (55 vs. 32%, P < 0.001) for the JNC 6 goal (130/85 mmHg). Only 42% of all type 1 diabetic hypertensive subjects met the new JNC 7 goal (130/80 mmHg). Type 1 diabetic subjects had better blood pressure control (72 vs. 32%, P < 0.0001), using 140/90 mmHg as a common measure. The majority of treated subjects were on a single antihypertensive agent (75 vs. 64%).
CONCLUSIONS—Subjects with type 1 diabetes have higher rates of hypertension prevalence, treatment, and control than nondiabetic subjects. However, hypertension remains largely uncontrolled, even if treated in high-risk populations, such as type 1 diabetic subjects and undiagnosed individuals in the general population. Achieving more stringent blood pressure goals will require increased attention and may necessitate the use of multiple antihypertensive agents.
- ADA, American Diabetes Association
- CACTI, Coronary Artery Calcification in Type 1 Diabetes
- JNC, Joint National Committee
- NHANES, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey
Footnotes
-
A table elsewhere in this issue shows conventional and Système International (SI) units and conversion factors for many substances.
-
- Accepted October 22, 2004.
- Received June 28, 2004.
- DIABETES CARE














