Advertisement

Leisure Time Physical Activity Is Associated With Poor Glycemic Control in Type 1 Diabetic Women

The FinnDiane study

  1. Johan Wadén, MD1,
  2. Heikki Tikkanen, MD, DMSC12,
  3. Carol Forsblom, MD, DMSC1,
  4. Johan Fagerudd, MD, DMSC1,
  5. Kim Pettersson-Fernholm, MD, DMSC1,
  6. Timo Lakka, MD, DMSC3,
  7. Mikael Riska, MD1,
  8. Per-Henrik Groop, MD, DMSC1 and
  9. on behalf of the FinnDiane Study Group
  1. 1Folkhälsan Institute of Genetics, Folkhälsan Research Center, Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Helsinki University Central Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
  2. 2Department of Sports and Exercise Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
  3. 3Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Baton Rouge, Louisiana
  1. Address correspondence and reprint requests to Per-Henrik Groop, Folkhälsan Research Center, Biomedicum Helsinki, Haartmaninkatu 8, P.O. Box 63, 00014 Helsinki, Finland. E-mail: per-henrik.groop{at}helsinki.fi

Abstract

OBJECTIVE—We studied the association between leisure time physical activity (LTPA) and glycemic control, insulin dose, and estimated glucose disposal rate (eGDR) in type 1 diabetes.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—This is a cross-sectional study of 1,030 type 1 diabetic patients participating in the Finnish Diabetic Nephropathy Study, a nationwide multicenter study. LTPA was assessed by a validated 12-month questionnaire and expressed in metabolic equivalent (MET) units. Patients were grouped as sedentary (LTPA <10 MET h/week, n = 247), moderately active (LTPA 10–40 MET h/week, n = 568), and active (LTPA >40 MET h/week, n = 215). Outcome measures were HbA1c, insulin dose, and eGDR (estimate of insulin sensitivity based on waist-to-hip ratio, hypertension, and HbA1c).

RESULTS—LTPA correlated with HbA1c in women (r = −0.12, P = 0.007) but not in men (r = −0.03, P = 0.592). Sedentary women had higher HbA1c than moderately active and active women: 8.8 ± 1.4% vs. 8.3 ± 1.4% vs. 8.3 ± 1.4% (P = 0.004), whereas HbA1c in men was 8.4 ± 1.3% vs. 8.2 ± 1.4% vs. 8.2 ± 1.3% (P = 0.774), respectively. In men, insulin doses were 0.74 ± 0.21 vs. 0.71 ± 0.20 vs. 0.68 ± 0.23 IU · kg–1 · 24 h–1 (P = 0.003). In both sexes, sedentary patients had lower eGDRs than active patients [median (interquartile range) 5.5 (4.0–8.2) vs. 6.8 (4.7–8.8) vs. 6.7 (4.6–8.6) mg · kg–1 · min–1; P < 0.01 for sedentary vs. others]. Age, obesity, smoking, insulin dose, social class, diabetic nephropathy, or cardiovascular disease did not explain the results.

CONCLUSIONS—Low levels of LTPA were associated with poor glycemic control in type 1 diabetic women. Men seem to use less insulin when physically active. Increased LTPA levels were associated with increased estimated insulin sensitivity. Longitudinal studies are needed to further clarify the effects of LTPA on type 1 diabetes.

Footnotes

  • A table elsewhere in this issue shows conventional and Système International (SI) units and conversion factors for many substances.

    • Accepted December 14, 2004.
    • Received June 22, 2004.
| Table of Contents
Advertisement