Advertisement

Reduced Hypoglycemia Risk With Insulin Glargine

A meta-analysis comparing insulin glargine with human NPH insulin in type 2 diabetes

  1. Julio Rosenstock, MD1,
  2. George Dailey, MD2,
  3. Massimo Massi-Benedetti, MD3,
  4. Andreas Fritsche, MD4,
  5. Zhengning Lin, PHD5 and
  6. Alan Salzman, MD5
  1. 1Dallas Diabetes and Endocrine Center, Dallas, Texas
  2. 2Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California
  3. 3Department of Medicine, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
  4. 4Medizinische Universitätsklinik, Tübingen, Germany
  5. 5Aventis Pharma, Bridgewater, New Jersey
  1. Address correspondence and reprint requests to Julio Rosenstock, MD, Dallas Diabetes and Endocrine Center, Medical City Dallas, 7777 Forest Ln., Suite C-618, Dallas, TX 75230. E-mail: juliorosenstock{at}dallasdiabetes.com

Abstract

OBJECTIVE—Insulin glargine (LANTUS) is a once-daily basal insulin analog with a smooth 24-h time-action profile that provides effective glycemic control with reduced hypoglycemia risk (particularly nocturnal) compared with NPH insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes. A recent “treat-to-target” study has shown that more patients on insulin glargine reached HbA1c levels ≤7.0% without confirmed nocturnal hypoglycemia compared with NPH insulin. We further assessed the risk for hypoglycemia in a meta-analysis of controlled trials of a similar design for insulin glargine versus once- or twice-daily NPH insulin in adults with type 2 diabetes.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—All studies were 24–28 weeks long, except one 52-week study, for which interim 20-week data were used.

RESULTS—Patient demographics were similar between the insulin glargine (n = 1,142) and NPH insulin (n = 1,162) groups. The proportion of patients achieving target HbA1c (≤7.0%) was similar between insulin glargine–and NPH insulin–treated patients (30.8 and 32.1%, respectively). There was a consistent significant reduction of hypoglycemia risk associated with insulin glargine, compared with NPH insulin, in terms of overall symptomatic (11%; P = 0.0006) and nocturnal (26%; P < 0.0001) hypoglycemia. Most notably, the risk of severe hypoglycemia and severe nocturnal hypoglycemia were reduced with insulin glargine by 46% (P = 0.0442) and 59% (P = 0.0231), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS—These results confirmed that insulin glargine given once daily reduces the risk of hypoglycemia compared with NPH insulin, which can facilitate more aggressive insulin treatment to a HbA1c target of ≤7.0% in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Footnotes

  • J.R., G.D., M.M.-B., and A.F. have received honoraria, consulting fees, and grant/research support from Aventis.

    • Accepted January 1, 2005.
    • Received September 17, 2004.
| Table of Contents
Advertisement