Effect of a Peroxisome Proliferator–Activated Receptor-γ Agonist on Myocardial Blood Flow in Type 2 Diabetes
- Graham T. McMahon, MB, BCH1,
- Jorge Plutzky, MD2,
- Edouard Daher, MD3,
- Tammy Bhattacharyya, MD4,
- George Grunberger, MD4 and
- Marcelo F. DiCarli, MD5
- 1Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Hypertension, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- 2Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- 3Division of Cardiology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan
- 4Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolism, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan
- 5Department of Nuclear Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Address correspondence and reprint requests to Marcelo F. DiCarli, MD, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Division of Nuclear Medicine, 75 Francis St., Boston, MA 02115. E-mail: mdicarli{at}partners.org
Abstract
OBJECTIVE—The relationship between coronary endothelial function and insulin resistance remains speculative. We sought to determine whether pioglitazone, an insulin-sensitizing peroxisome proliferator–activated receptor (PPAR)-γ agonist, improves cardiac endothelial function in individuals with type 2 diabetes.
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—Sixteen subjects with insulin-treated type 2 diabetes and without overt cardiovascular disease were randomly assigned to receive either 45 mg of pioglitazone or matching placebo for 3 months. Rest and adenosine-stimulated myocardial blood flow (MBF) were quantified with [13N]ammonia and positron emission tomography at baseline and study conclusion.
RESULTS—After 3 months, HbA1c levels dropped by 0.68% in the pioglitazone group and increased by 0.17% in the placebo group (P = 0.009 for difference between groups). Triglyceride (−93 vs. −39 mg/dl, P = 0.026) and HDL concentrations (+4.8 vs. −6.0 mg/dl, P = 0.014) improved significantly in the pioglitazone group compared with placebo. Despite these favorable changes, there was no demonstrable change in baseline MBF (−0.05 ± 0.24 vs. −0.09 ± 0.24 ml · min−1 · g−1, P = 0.45), adenosine-stimulated MBF (0.10 ± 0.75 vs. 0.14 ± 0.31 ml · min−1 · g−1, P = 0.25), or coronary flow reserve (0.45 ± 1.22 vs. 0.35 ± 0.72 ml · min−1 · g−1, P = 0.64) after 12 weeks of exposure to pioglitazone or placebo, respectively. Regression analysis revealed that lower glucose concentration at the time of the study was associated with higher coronary flow reserve (P = 0.012).
CONCLUSIONS—Pioglitazone treatment for 12 weeks in subjects with insulin-requiring type 2 diabetes had no demonstrable effect on coronary flow reserve despite metabolic improvements. Higher ambient glucose levels contribute to impaired vascular reactivity in individuals with diabetes.
- MBF, myocardial blood flow
- PET, positron emission tomography
- PPAR, peroxisome proliferator–activated receptor
Footnotes
-
J.P. is a consultant, stockholder, and grant recipient of Takeda. M.F.D. has received honoraria for speaking engagements from GE Medical Systems, Fujisawa, and Bristol-Myers Squibb Medical Imaging.
A table elsewhere in this issue shows conventional and Système International (SI) units and conversion factors for many substances.
-
- Accepted January 27, 2005.
- Received October 18, 2004.
- DIABETES CARE














