Skip to main content
  • More from ADA
    • Diabetes
    • Clinical Diabetes
    • Diabetes Spectrum
    • Standards of Medical Care
    • Scientific Sessions Abstracts
    • BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
  • Follow ada on Twitter
  • RSS
  • Visit ada on Facebook
Diabetes Care

Advanced Search

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current
    • Current Issue
    • Online Ahead of Print
    • New and Noteworthy
    • Standards of Medical Care
  • Browse
    • By Topic
    • Issue Archive
    • Special Collections
    • Recent ADA Position Statements
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • Meet the Editors
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Journal Policies
    • For Authors
    • For Reviewers
    • For Advertisers
  • Subscriptions
    • Manage Online Access
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Purchase Single Issues
  • Alerts
    • E­mail Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Podcasts
    • Diabetes Core Update
    • Diabetes Discovery
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Journal Policies
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Peer Review
  • More from ADA
    • Diabetes
    • Clinical Diabetes
    • Diabetes Spectrum
    • Standards of Medical Care
    • Scientific Sessions Abstracts
    • BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Diabetes Care
  • Home
  • Current
    • Current Issue
    • Online Ahead of Print
    • New and Noteworthy
    • Standards of Medical Care
  • Browse
    • By Topic
    • Issue Archive
    • Special Collections
    • Recent ADA Position Statements
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • Meet the Editors
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Journal Policies
    • For Authors
    • For Reviewers
    • For Advertisers
  • Subscriptions
    • Manage Online Access
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Purchase Single Issues
  • Alerts
    • E­mail Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Podcasts
    • Diabetes Core Update
    • Diabetes Discovery
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Journal Policies
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Peer Review
Letters: Comments and Responses

Glycemic Index, Glycemic Load, and Glycemic Response Are Not the Same

  1. Alan W. Barclay, BSC, GRADDIPDIET1,
  2. Jennie C. Brand-Miller, PHD1 and
  3. Thomas M.S. Wolever, MD, PHD2
  1. 1School of Molecular and Microbial Biosciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
  2. 2Department of Nutritional Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  1. Address correspondence to Alan Barclay, Diabetes Australia, GPO Box 9824, Sydney, NSW, 2001, Australia. E-mail: awbarclay{at}optusnet.com.au
Diabetes Care 2005 Jul; 28(7): 1839-1840. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.28.7.1839
PreviousNext
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

The paper by Hodge et al. (1) published in the November 2004 issue of Diabetes Care aptly contrasts the potential benefits of moderately high-carbohydrate diets with a low glycemic index (GI) versus diets that have a lower glycemic load (GL) by virtue of a low carbohydrate content. In their prospective analysis of a cohort of ∼36,000 adults followed for 4 years, Hodge et. al found that higher-carbohydrate diets were associated with a lower risk of development of type 2 diabetes. However, the type of carbohydrate was equally important: low-GI carbohydrates reduced the risk, while high-GI carbohydrates increased the risk. Thus, low GI and low GL are not equivalent and produce different clinical outcomes.

Because this issue may be confusing to some readers, it is important to clarify the difference between GI and GL. Both the quality and quantity of carbohydrate determines an individual’s glycemic response to a food or meal (2). By definition, the GI compares equal quantities of available carbohydrate in foods and provides a measure of carbohydrate quality. Available carbohydrate can be calculated by summing the quantity of available sugars, starch, oligosaccharides, and maltodextrins. As defined (3), the GL is the product of a food’s GI and its total available carbohydrate content: glycemic load = [GI × carbohydrate (g)]/100.

Therefore, the GL provides a summary measure of the relative glycemic impact of a “typical” serving of the food. Foods with a GL ≤10 have been classified as low GL, and those with a value ≥20 as high GL (4). In healthy individuals, stepwise increases in GL have been shown to predict stepwise elevations in postprandial blood glucose and/or insulin levels (5).

It can be seen from the equation that either a low-GI/high-carbohydrate food or a high-GI/low-carbohydrate food can have the same GL. However, while the effects on postprandial glycemia may be similar, there is evidence that the two approaches will have very different metabolic effects, including differences in β-cell function (6), triglyceride concentrations (7), free fatty acid levels (7), and effects on satiety (8). Hence, the distinction has important implications for the prevention and management of diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Our concern is that the use of the GL or “glycemic response” in isolation may lead to the habitual consumption of lower-carbohydrate diets.

The simplest way to consume a moderately high-carbohydrate, but low-GI diet is to follow the new 2005 Dietary Guidelines for Americans (9) and to incorporate the recommendations of the World Health Organization/Food and Agriculture Organization (10); that is, the GI should be used to compare foods of similar composition within food groups. By choosing the lower-GI options within a food category (breads, breakfast cereals, etc.), an individual automatically chooses those with a lower GL. Because most fruit and vegetables, other than potatoes, are not major contributors to carbohydrate intake, their GI should not be the basis for restriction.

The important message for clinicians, nutritionists, and food industry professionals is that the evidence, as it stands, suggests that for preventing type 2 diabetes, we ought to encourage low-GI carbohydrate foods but not those that simply have low “net carbs,” low GL, or produce a low glycemic response.

Footnotes

  • T.M.S.W. is president of the Board of Directors of, holds stock in, and has received grant/research support from G.I. Testing. T.M.S.W. also holds stock in G.I. Laboratories.

  • DIABETES CARE

References

  1. ↵
    Hodge AM, English DR, O’Dea K, Giles GG: Glycemic index and dietary fiber and the risk of type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 27: 2701–2706, 2004
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    Sheard NF, Clark NG, Brand-Miller JC, Franz MJ, Pi-Sunyer FX, Mayer-Davis E, Kulkarni K, Geil P: Dietary carbohydrate (amount and type) in the prevention and management of diabetes: a statement by the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care 27: 2266–2271, 2004
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    Salmeron J, Manson JAE, Stampfer MJ, Colditz GA, Wing AL, Jenkins DJ, Wing AL, Willett WC: Dietary fiber, glycemic load, and risk of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus in women. JAMA 277: 472–477, 1997
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. ↵
    Brand-Miller JC, Holt SHA, Petocz P: Reply to R. Mendosa. Am J Clin Nutr 77: 994–995, 2003
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    Brand-Miller JC, Thomas M, Swan V, Ahmad ZI, Petocz P, Colagiuri S: Physiological validation of the concept of glycemic load in lean young adults. J Nutr 133: 2728–2732, 2003
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    Wolever TMS, Mehling C: High-carbohydrate/low-glycaemic index dietary advice improves glucose disposition index in subjects with impaired glucose tolerance. Br J Nutr 87: 477–487, 2002
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  7. ↵
    Wolever TMS, Mehling C: Long-term effect of varying the source or amount of dietary carbohydrate on postprandial plasma glucose, insulin, triacylglycerol, and free fatty acid concentrations in subjects with impaired glucose tolerance. Am J Clin Nutr 76: 5–56, 2002
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    Ball SD, Keller KR, Moyer-Mileur LJ, Ding YW, Donaldson D, Jackson WD: Prolongation of satiety after low versus moderately high glycemic index meals in obese adolescents. Pediatrics 111: 488–494, 2003
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    Dietary Guidelines for Americans 2005 [article online]. Department of Health and Human Services and the U.S. Department of Agriculture. Available from www.healthierus.gov/dietaryguidelines. Accessed 16 January 2005
  10. ↵
    Food and Agriculture Organization/World Health Organization: Carbohydrates in human nutrition: report of a Joint FAO/WHO expert consultation. FAO Food and Nutrition Paper 66: 1–140, 1998
    OpenUrlPubMed
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Diabetes Care: 28 (7)

In this Issue

July 2005, 28(7)
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by Author
Sign up to receive current issue alerts
View Selected Citations (0)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about Diabetes Care.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Glycemic Index, Glycemic Load, and Glycemic Response Are Not the Same
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Diabetes Care
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Diabetes Care web site.
Citation Tools
Glycemic Index, Glycemic Load, and Glycemic Response Are Not the Same
Alan W. Barclay, Jennie C. Brand-Miller, Thomas M.S. Wolever
Diabetes Care Jul 2005, 28 (7) 1839-1840; DOI: 10.2337/diacare.28.7.1839

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Add to Selected Citations
Share

Glycemic Index, Glycemic Load, and Glycemic Response Are Not the Same
Alan W. Barclay, Jennie C. Brand-Miller, Thomas M.S. Wolever
Diabetes Care Jul 2005, 28 (7) 1839-1840; DOI: 10.2337/diacare.28.7.1839
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Primary Aldosteronism in Diabetic Subjects With Resistant Hypertension
  • Primary Aldosteronism in Diabetic Subjects With Resistant Hypertension
  • Cigarette Smoking Is Associated With Low Glomerular Filtration Rate in Male Patients With Type 2 Diabetes
Show more Letters: Comments and Responses

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Current Issue
  • Online Ahead of Print
  • Archives
  • Submit
  • Subscribe
  • Email Alerts
  • RSS Feeds

More Information

  • About the Journal
  • Instructions for Authors
  • Journal Policies
  • Reprints and Permissions
  • Advertising
  • Privacy Policy: ADA Journals
  • Copyright Notice/Public Access Policy
  • Contact Us

Other ADA Resources

  • Diabetes
  • Clinical Diabetes
  • Diabetes Spectrum
  • BMJ Open - Diabetes Research & Care
  • Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes
  • Scientific Sessions Abstracts
  • Professional Books
  • Diabetes Forecast

 

  • DiabetesJournals.org
  • Diabetes Core Update
  • ADA's DiabetesPro
  • ADA Member Directory
  • Diabetes.org

© 2018 by the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care Print ISSN: 0149-5992, Online ISSN: 1935-5548.