Protein Hydrolysate/Leucine Co-Ingestion Reduces the Prevalence of Hyperglycemia in Type 2 Diabetic Patients

  1. Ralph J.F. Manders, MSC1,
  2. Stephan F.E. Praet, MD2,
  3. Ruth C.R. Meex, MSC1,
  4. René Koopman, PHD1,
  5. André L. de Roos, PHD3,
  6. Anton J.M. Wagenmakers, PHD4,
  7. Wim H.M. Saris, MD, PHD1 and
  8. Luc J.C. van Loon, PHD12
  1. 1Department of Human Biology, Nutrition and Toxicology Research Institute Maastricht, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
  2. 2Department of Movement Sciences, Nutrition and Toxicology Research Institute Maastricht, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
  3. 3Food Technology Department, DSM Food Specialties, Delft, the Netherlands
  4. 4School of Sport and Exercise Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, U.K.
  1. Address correspondence and reprint requests to Ralph J.F. Manders, MSc, Department of Human Biology, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, Netherlands. E-mail: r.manders{at}hb.unimaas.nl

Epidemiological surveys and preliminary intervention studies have shown that postprandial hyperglycemia is a direct and independent risk factor for the development of cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetes (1–4). Moreover, it has been reported that postprandial spikes in blood glucose concentration are even more relevant to the onset of cardiovascular complications than merely elevated fasting blood glucose levels (5–7).

Protein hydrolysate/leucine coingestion could represent an effective nutritional intervention to stimulate postprandial insulin secretion, augment postprandial blood glucose disposal, and improve blood glucose homeostasis in type 2 diabetic patients (8–10). Though promising, the clinical relevance and applicability of such a nutritional intervention remains to be established.

In the present study, we applied continuous glucose monitoring to assess the impact of protein hydrolysate/leucine coingestion with each main meal as a nutritional intervention strategy to improve daily glycemic control in long-standing type 2 diabetic patients.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—

Eleven long-standing type 2 diabetic patients (aged 58 ± 1 years, BMI 28 ± 1 kg/m2, HbA1c 7.4 ± 0.3%) and 11 matched healthy control subjects (aged 59 ± 2 years, BMI 28 ± 1 kg/m2, HbA1c 5.5 ± 0.1%) participated in this study. All subjects were screened for type 2 diabetes according to American Diabetes Association guidelines (11). Type 2 diabetic patients …

« Previous | Next Article »Table of Contents