Efficacy of Benfluorex in Combination With Sulfonylurea in Type 2 Diabetic Patients

An 18-week, randomized, double-blind study

  1. Philippe Moulin, MD, PHD1,
  2. Marie Andre, MD2,
  3. Hasan Alawi, MD3,
  4. Lelita C. dos Santos, MD4,
  5. Abdul K. Khalid, MD5,
  6. Dragomir Koev, MD6,
  7. Ray Moore, MRCP7,
  8. Viorel Serban, MD8,
  9. Brigitte Picandet, MD2 and
  10. Marie Francillard, MD, PHD2
  1. 1Endocrinology Department, Cardiovascular Hospital, University Claude Bernard, Lyon, France
  2. 2Institut de Recherches Internationales Servier, Courbevoie, France
  3. 3Schwerpunkt Diabetologie Klinik, Saarlouis, Germany
  4. 4University Hospital of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
  5. 5Universiti Kebangsaan, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  6. 6University of Sofia, Sofia, Bulgaria
  7. 7Umhlanga Hospital, Durban, South Africa
  8. 8Spitalul Judetean, Timisoara, Romania
  1. Address correspondence and reprint requests to Prof. P. Moulin, Service d’Endocrinologie—Unite 11, Hôpital Cardio-Vasculaire Louis Pradel, 28 avenue Doyen Lepine, 69677 Bron Cedex, France. E-mail: philippe.moulin{at}chu-lyon.fr

Abstract

OBJECTIVE—The aim of this study was to demonstrate the superiority of benfluorex over placebo as an add-on therapy in type 2 diabetic patients in whom diabetes is insufficiently controlled by sulfonylurea monotherapy and who have a limitation for the use of metformin.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—Type 2 diabetic patients with HbA1c (A1C) (7–10%) who were receiving the maximum tolerated sulfonylurea dose and had a contraindication to or poor tolerance of metformin were randomly assigned (double blind) to receive benfluorex 450 mg/day (n = 165) or placebo (n = 160) for 18 weeks. The main efficacy criterion was A1C, analyzed as the change from baseline to the end of treatment using ANCOVA with baseline and country as covariates. Secondary criteria were fasting plasma glucose (FPG), insulin resistance, and plasma lipid level.

RESULTS—Both groups were similar at baseline in the intention-to-treat population. A1C significantly decreased with benfluorex from 8.34 ± 0.83 to 7.52 ± 1.04% (P < 0.001) and tended to increase with placebo from 8.33 ± 0.87 to 8.52 ± 1.36% (NS), resulting in a mean adjusted difference between groups of −1.01% (95% CI −1.26 to −0.76; P < 0.001). The target A1C (≤7%) was achieved in 34% of patients receiving benfluorex versus 12% of patients receiving placebo. Significant between-group differences in favor of benfluorex were observed for mean FPG (−1.65 mmol/l) (P < 0.001) and for homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance. Overall tolerance was similar in both groups. Serious adverse events were more frequent in the benfluorex group, without evidence of causality relationship.

CONCLUSIONS—Benfluorex as an add-on therapy was superior to placebo in lowering A1C with a between-group difference of 1% in type 2 diabetic patients whose disease was insufficiently controlled with sulfonylurea alone and in whom metformin was contraindicated or not tolerated.

Footnotes

  • A table elsewhere in this issue shows conventional and Système International (SI) units and conversion factors for many substances.

    The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked “advertisement” in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

    • Accepted November 20, 2005.
    • Received August 2, 2005.
« Previous | Next Article »Table of Contents