Advertisement

High-Risk Individuals’ Willingness to Pay for Diabetes Risk-Reduction Programs

  1. F. Reed Johnson, PHD1,
  2. Ranjani Manjunath, MA2,
  3. Carol A. Mansfield, PHD1,
  4. Laurel J. Clayton, BA1,
  5. Thomas J. Hoerger, PHD1 and
  6. Ping Zhang, PHD3
  1. 1RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
  2. 2GlaxoSmithKline, Durham, North Carolina
  3. 3the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
  1. Address correspondence and reprint requests to Thomas J. Hoerger, RTI-UNC Center for Excellence in Health Promotion Economics, RTI International, 3040 Cornwallis Rd., P.O. Box 12194, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709. E-mail: tjh{at}rti.org

Abstract

OBJECTIVE—The purpose of this study was to estimate how much at-risk individuals are willing to pay for type 2 diabetes primary prevention programs.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—An Internet-based, choice-format conjoint survey was presented to individuals at elevated risk for type 2 diabetes. Hypothetical diabetes risk-reduction programs included seven features: diet, exercise, counseling, medication, weight loss goal, risk reduction, and program costs. The sample included 582 individuals aged ≥45 years, two-thirds of whom were obese. Conditional logit models were used to calculate participants’ willingness to pay for risk reduction programs. Each respondent’s self-assessed risk of developing diabetes was compared with an objective measure based on a diabetes screening tool.

RESULTS—Many respondents underestimated their personal risk of developing diabetes. Those with a low perceived risk were less likely to indicate that they would participate in a diabetes prevention program. Individuals had the strongest preference for programs with large weight loss goals, fewer restrictions on diet, and larger reductions in the risk of diabetes. Respondents were willing to pay ∼$1,500 over 3 years to participate in a lifestyle intervention program similar to the Diabetes Prevention Program. Individuals with a high perceived risk were willing to pay more than individuals with lower perceived risk.

CONCLUSIONS—Many individuals will be willing to participate in interventions to delay or prevent diabetes if the interventions are subsidized, but most will be unwilling to pay the full program cost. Our results also offer insights for designing risk-reduction programs that appeal to potential participants.

Footnotes

  • R.M. was employed by RTI International at the time this study was conducted.

    Full statistical results are available upon request.

    Additional information for this article can be found in an online appendix at http://care.diabetesjournals.org.

    A table elsewhere in this issue shows conventional and Système International (SI) units and conversion factors for many substances.

    See accompanying editorial, p. 1447.

    The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked “advertisement” in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

    • Accepted January 31, 2006.
    • Received November 14, 2005.
| Table of Contents
Advertisement